Group Formation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Group Formation

Description:

Group Formation (09:00 12:00): MBTI Results: 'general population vs. FAAP' ... Risk-taker. Can cope with failure. Spends time alone or. other innovators [ 21 ] ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:340
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: ClausBr2
Category:
Tags: formation | group | taker

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Group Formation


1
Group Formation
( FÅP First-year Project Course, ITU, Denmark )
  • Claus Brabrand
  • brabrand_at_itu.dk

2
Outline for Today
  • Group Formation (0900 1200)
  • MBTI Results general population vs. FAAP
  • Peer Assessment
  • Technology Adoption and Diffusion Theory
  • Group Formation !
  • Group Exercises
  • White-box Testing (1300 1600)
  • Lecture
  • Exercises

3
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
  • Introversion vs. Extraversion ("attitudes")
  • I internal world (concepts/ideas/reflect),
    energy from timeout, thinkact
  • E external world (people/action/things), energy
    from action, actthink
  • Sensing vs. iNtuition ("irrational functions",
    applied to 'data' received)
  • S "concrete", trust information in present,
    details / facts, meaning data
  • N "abstract", trust theories, meaning
    pattern, theory, or wider context
  • Feeling vs. Thinking ("decision making
    functions", for rational choices)
  • F associated decisions empathize with
    situation, inside perspective
  • T dissociated decisions logical/causes/consisten
    t, outside perspective
  • Judging vs. Perceiving ("lifestyle", relates to
    how to get things done)
  • J come to decision, clear plan, start in good
    time, "inflexible"
  • P leave matters open, await or postpone
    decisions, "too flexible"

cf. wikipedia for more info
Carl G. Jung, 1920
4
Putting People into 16 Boxes
S
N
J
ISTJ ( Inspector )
ISFJ ( Protector )
INFJ ( Counselor )
INTJ ( Mastermind )
I
ISTP ( Crafter )
ISFP ( Composer )
INFP ( Healer )
INTP ( Architect )
P
ESTP ( Promoter )
ESFP ( Performer )
ENFP ( Champion )
ENTP ( Inventor )
E
ESTJ ( Supervisor )
ESFJ ( Provider )
ENFJ ( Teacher )
ENTJ ( Field Marshal )
J
T
F
T
5
Introversion vs. Extroversion
Introversion
Extroversion
FÅP
POP
cf. wikipedia
6
Sensing vs. iNtuition
Sensing
iNtuition
FÅP
POP
!
cf. wikipedia
7
Feeling vs. Thinking
Feeling
Thinking
FÅP
POP
cf. wikipedia
8
Judging vs. Perceiving
Judging
Perceiving
FÅP
POP
cf. wikipedia
9
Artisans / Crafters (SP)
  • Sensing Perceivers
  • Fun-loving, optimistic, focused on present
  • Daring, unconventional, bold, impulsive, and
    spontaneous. 
  • Want recognition and seek attention
  • Entertainers

!
FÅP
POP
cf. wikipedia
10
Idealists / Catalysts (NF)
  • iNtuitive Feelers
  • Enthusiastic, trust their intuition, seek their
    true self, prize meaningful relationships 
  • Kindhearted and authentic, dislike conflict
  • Giving, trusting, spiritual
  • Passionately concerned with personal growth
    ethics
  • Mentors and advocates

!
FÅP
POP
cf. wikipedia
11
Guardians / Stabilizers (SJ)
  • Sensing Judgers
  • Dependable, loyal, helpful, hard-working
  • Follow rules, trust authority, and cooperate with
    others
  • Prefer structure and order, and focus on
    credentials and traditions
  • Stabilizing leaders
  • Administrators

!
FÅP
POP
cf. wikipedia
12
Rationals / Strategists (NT)
  • iNtuitive Thinkers
  • Inventors, coordinators, and competent planners
  • Trust logic, independent, and strong willed
  • Outspoken, dont care about political correctness
  • Skeptical of others, confident of themselves
  • Yearn for achievement, want to understand how the
    world works
  • Strategic leaders

!
FÅP
POP
cf. wikipedia
13
Group Formation
  • Homogenous
  • 1n 1 )
  • Heterogenous
  • Innovation Structure
  • Plan Implementation
  • Action Thought
  • User- Technical-focus


Diversity more inputs"
More inputs"
14
Considerations (Group Formation)
  • Considerations e.g.
  • a) Balance Introverts and Extroverts
  • Too many intros ? few discussions / limited
    exchange
  • Too many extros ? Blah blah blah
  • b) Avoid strategist-strategist clashes
  • More likely to clash
  • c) Balance heterogeneously wrt. MBTI and VARK
  • Many different inputs
  • d) Avoid old group mates in same group
  • Learn to work with new people
  • Avoid sub-groups (aka, cliques)

15
Peer Assessment
  • Advice for you(r group)

16
Peer Assessment Questions
  • Answer all eight questions for each person (going
    around the table)
  • Give opportunity to air problems
  • Give feedback on how others perceive you(r
    behavior)
  • In meetings, have I
  • 1. Dominated the meetings
  • 2. Come unprepared
  • 3. Not participated actively

17
Peer Assessment Q. (contd)
  • My workload, have I
  • 4. Carried my load fairly w/ quality
  • 5. Taken over other members tasks without
    being asked
  • In communicating, have I
  • 6. Really listened to others
  • 7. Shared info needed by team
  • 8. Responded to emails promptly

18
Technology Adoption and Diffusion Theory
  • Tech people vs. General population

19
Diffusion Theory Technology Adoption
  • Tech Adoption
  • Diffusion Theory

20
Innovators (aka. Pioneers)
  • Innovators (Pioneers)
  • Like adventure
  • Seek the new
  • Daring
  • Risk-taker
  • Can cope with failure
  • Spends time alone or other innovators

21
Early Adopters
  • Early Adopters
  • Part of local social system
  • Opinion is valued
  • Systematic decisions on innovations
  • Reasonable risk tolerance

22
Early Majority
  • Early Majority
  • Frequently interact with peers
  • Rarely opinion leader, but will follow
  • Need some encouragement (perceived usefulness)
  • Moderate risk tolerance (assumes safer in large
    numbers)

23
Late Majority
  • Late Majority
  • Skeptical of anything new
  • Needs peer pressure and economic incentive to
    adopt (perceived value)
  • Does not like any risk

24
Non Adopters
  • Non Adopters
  • Will not adopt unless mandated
  • Will give all kinds of excuses to defend staying
    with old
  • Traditionalist prefers to interact with other
    traditionalists

25
Population vs. Tech People
26
Implications (for IT people)
  • Sandras conclusions (for IT people)
  • IT cannot
  • Solve problems for users, if developers cannot
    see things from other viewpoints (dissociate from
    own perspective)
  • Expect everyone to be as logical and structured
  • IT teams need
  • Team training (BPRO -)
  • More practice on communication (BPRO -)
  • Extra support, not extra control
  • More clarity on expectations (and fewer
    assumptions)

27
The Groups are
28
White
Tobias
Christian H.
Martina
Stina
29
Yellow
Søren
Jonas
Oddfridur
Vincens
30
Orange
Casper F. F.
Lasse
Kasper V.
Samuel
31
Red
Casper V.
Marco
Morten
Nikolas
32
Green
Benjamin
Jeppe
Simon
Thomas
33
Blue
Joachim
Kasper N.
Martin
Niclas
34
Brown
Hjalte
Lise
Loa
Nick
35
Black
Anders
Christian P. N.
Kenneth
Michael
Tim
36
Resources
Thanks to Sandra Poindexter for inspiration and
use of slides!
  • Please Understand Me II Temperament, Character,
    Intelligence by D. Keirsey and M. Bates, 1998
    http//www.keirsey.com/
  • 9 Traits of Highly Successful Teams with L.
    Ankarlo, CareerTrack Seminar Products
  • Three ways to motivate your IT team (that really
    work) by J. West. 01 August, 2007, CIO Magazine
    CIO.com.
  • The Human Dynamics of IT Teams by J. Tucker, A.
    Mackness, H. Rutledge. Feb. 2004, CrossTalk,
    www.stsc.hill.af.mil/CrossTalk/2004/02/0402Tucker.
    html
  • Diffusion of Innovations, E. Rogers

37
Conflict Behavior Patterns
  • Conflict behavior patterns
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com