Title: A%20Slippery%20Slope
1A Slippery Slope
- How much Global Warming Constitutes Dangerous
Anthropogenic Interference?
2Why is this issue important?
3Climate Impact of Increasing CO2
- Increases the surface air temperature
- Decrease sea ice which leads to an increase in
sea level - Possible melting of glaciers halts deep ocean
circulation in North Atlantic (similar to Younger
Dryas Event) - Decrease of soil moisture leads to drought
- Impacts on El Niño and Hurricanes
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8Submerged regions from 100m increase in seal
level
9(No Transcript)
10- Model Simulates Large Scale Atmospheric
Phenomena - Increase in temperature changes the storm track
and predominate wind flow - Leads to desertification of the eastern half of
North America - Adversely affects agriculture and growing seasons
11Impacts on El Niño and Hurricanes?
- Models cannot resolve impacts on El Niño and
hurricanes yet - Increasing SSTs could influence strength of
storms - Changing large scale patterns could influence
storm paths
12Hansens arguments
13(No Transcript)
14The Slippery Slope Argument
- Based on the contention that ice sheet
disintegration is a wet, potentially rapid
process - Thus, sea level rise from melting glaciers
requires that only low limits on global warming
can be tolerated without risking dangerous
anthropogenic interference with climate
15Problems with Ice Sheet Modeling?
- IPCC estimates between 9-88 cm sea level rise
over next 110 years - Based mainly on thermal expansion of ocean water,
secondarily on melting glaciers - Simulations show both Greenland and Antarctic ice
sheets growing at a rate equivalent to sea level
drop of 12 cm per century
16Problems with Ice Sheet Modeling?
- 2002 study by Zwally,et al. shows that ice sheet
flow accelerates as melt-water is delivered via
moulins to the ice sheet base - 2004 study by Parizek Alley found that the
Greenland ice sheet is likely to make a larger
contribution to sea-level rise that previously
believed - Doubling CO2 results in 0.6-6.6 cm rise in sea
level
17Problems with Ice Sheet Modeling?
- Hansen argues that even these calculations are
too conservative - Models do not currently incorporate realistic and
important processes that will accelerate ice
sheet disintegration.
18Important Factors
- Global energy imbalance
- 1 W/m2 more energy absorbed from sun than
emitted out to space - Due mainly to rapid growth of GHGs
(anthropogenic) - Based on sea level rise, only 5-10 of energy
imbalance went into melting of ice during 20th
century - Hansen suggests that this percentage will
increase with time, as atmosphere becomes more
moist and transports energy more efficiently to
the ice. - Accelerating ice streams increases transport of
ice to the ocean, cooling the ocean, and
maintaining global energy imbalance. - Increased melt-water contributes to sea level
rise, but more importantly breaks up ice sheets,
accelerating movemnt of ice towards the ocean
19Positive Feedbacks
- Higher Ts in low/mid latitudes will increase
rainfall intensity. - Transferring more energy to ice sheets via
increased atmospheric latent heat transport - Sea sfc cooling increases planetary energy
imbalance, thus increasing flux of heat into the
system - Air pollution (soot) accelerates ice melting by
causing snow to age into larger, wetter
particles.
20Disaster?
- Net effect of prolonged exposure to these
forcings is out of control cycle resulting in
demise of entire south dome of Greenland ice
sheet? - How long is long enough?
21Temporal Factors The Slippery Slope
- 3 critical time constants
- T1 time required for climate (specifically
ocean sfc temp) to respond to a forced change in
global energy imbalance - T2 time required for society to change its
energy systems enough to reverse GHG growth - T3 time required for ice sheets to respond to a
large, positive planetary energy imbalance
- Hansen estimates
- T1 50-100 yrs
- T2 50-100 yrs
- T3 unknown, controversial
- IPCC believes millennia
- Hansen thinks centuries
22Key Issues
- Ice Sheet growth is dry process, take millennia
- Limited by snowfall
- Disintegration is wet process.
- Can occur more rapidly
- If T3 T1T2, once ice sheet change passes
critical point, will be impossible to prevent
serious disintegration
23Problem
- What levels of anthropogenic climate forcings
will alter the climate to the precipice of
disaster? - Dangerous anthropogenic interfence could occur
more quickly than IPCC models project
24IPCCs Stance
25Sea Level Changes
- Global mean sea level has risen 10-25 cm over
the last 100 years. - There has been no detectable acceleration of sea
level rise during this century. However, the
average rise during the present century is
significantly higher than the rate averages over
the last several thousand years.
26Effects of Global Warming
- Global warming should, on average, cause the
oceans to warm and expand, thus increasing sea
level. - Global warming should, on average, increase the
melt rates of glaciers and ice caps, causing sea
level to rise. Observational data indicates that,
globally, there has been a general retreat of
glaciers during this century.
27Greenland Ice Sheet
- With respect to the Greenland ice sheet, a
warmer climate should increase the melt rates at
the margins. The increase in melting should
dominate over any increase in accumulation rates
in the interior, causing sea level to rise.
28Antarctic Ice Sheet
- With respect to the Antarctic ice sheet, a
warming climate should increase accumulation
rates, causing sea level to fall. - (Even if climate warms, Antarctica will still be
below freezing, and the warmer air would hold
more water vapor, which would increase snowfall
and offset any melting.)
29Model Predictions
30Outlook
- Scientists unsure if polar ice sheets are growing
or shrinking. - Projections of sea level rise have a high degree
of uncertainty due to lack of specific knowledge
Source of the sea level rise Change
Thermal expansion of oceans 15 cm
Melting of glaciers, ice caps 12 cm
Greenland ice sheet melting 7 cm
Antarctic ice sheet - 7 cm
Best total estimate 27 cm
31What We Think
- Hansen raises good points about the shortcomings
of the models they should take more feedbacks
into account - His theories seem tenuous similar uncertainties
in data and effects that plague current IPCC - We do need to be cautious about CO2 emissions
32Sources
- Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
http//www.gfdl.gov/tk/climate_dynamics/ - 100m figures from An End to Global Warming by
Laurence O. Williams - Hansen, J. 2004. A Slippery Slope How much
global warming constitutes dangerous
anthropogenic interference?, Clim. Change.