Title: 20082009 Budget Crisis
12008-2009 Budget Crisis
- Ramona Unified School District
- March 4, 2008
2State Fiscal Crisis
- Weakness in the State economy and revenues
- Failure of prior State budgets to come to terms
with the structural budget gap - Failure to set dollars aside for eventual
downturn in the economy - Inability of economy to outgrow the problem
- Faulty assumptions in the current budget resulted
in a 14.5 Billion (now 16.1) deficit for
2008-09 - 16.1 Billion deficit is an 11 increase in the
projected deficit problem - Governor has declared it will be dealt with by
strictly making across-the-board cuts
32007-2008 (Current Year)
- Governor proposed 360 Million current year
reduction to K-12 Education - Governor believed this would come from sweeping
up unspent categorical funds - However, Schools Services of California, along
with FCMAT, believed the Governor would only get
half from the sweep and the other half would have
to come from a 0.5 reduction to revenue limit,
or about 134,000 for RUSD - Delay in the second principal apportionment from
July until September, which creates a cash flow
issue for schools - Tighten current RUSD budget, keep positions open,
limit spending to soften the potential cut and/or
to help in 2008-09
42007-2008 (Current Year)Update
- 507 Million has been taken away from Education
- The cuts, so far, have been away from the general
fund - No certainty more 2007-08 cuts wont occur
- Delay will occur in the July and August advanced
principal apportionment until September, creating
a cash flow issue for schools districts - January revenues were 277 Million, or 2.4 below
projections
5Governors Proposed 2008-2009 Budget
- Increase COLA to revenue limit and categorical
programs - Deficit of 6.99 applied to increased revenue
limit - Net effect is a 2.4 reduction to the revenue
limit from the 2007-08 base - Most categorical programs have a net loss of
about 6.5 from the 2007-08 base
6Governors Proposed 2008-2009 Budget
- Special Education is especially hit hard
- No COLA
- A 6.5 cut from prior year levels
- Increased costs
- No help from the Feds (bifurcated COLA)
- Required services have to be maintained and the
funding has been reduced - Any shortfall in funding will have to come from
the general fund - Losses to State total more than 4 Billion
- To maintain programs, such as Special Education,
class size reduction, transportation, etc., cuts
will need to be backfilled from school districts
general funds
7RUSD Impact on 2008-2009 Budget
- Loss in Revenues
- Revenue Limit 880,759 2.4
- Class Size Red. 119,635 6.5
- Transportation 33,224 6.5
- Special Ed. 190,950 6.5
- Total Loss in Revenues 1,224,568
8RUSD Impact on 2008-2009 Budget
- Increased Expenses
- Step/Column 742,342 2
- Util./Ins. Increase 106,387 5
- Health Benefit 679,000 14
- Ongoing Operational 150,000
- Total Increase in Expenses 1,677,729
9RUSD Impact on 2008-2009 Budget
- Decrease in Revenues 1,224,568
- Increase in Expenses 1,677,729
- Total Deficit 2,902,297
-
- Set-Aside for 2008-09 800,000
- Total Deficit for 2008-09 2,102,297
-
10RUSD Impact on 2008-2009 Budget
- If the deficit is 16.1 Billion, or an 11
increase in the State deficit, this could
translate into an additional shortfall of
134,702 to RUSD, for a total of 1,359,270 in
decreased revenues - Potential Compensation Adjustment Should the
District and all employee groups agree on
compensation adjustments, the cost impact could
be 220,000 in 2007-08 and slightly higher in
2008-09 -- approximately 224,446 -- for a total
net expense impact of 444,446 -
11The Budget Process
- The Governors January proposal is the start of a
long deliberation among many parties - It reflects the Administration's general policy
intent for the fiscal year - But it is by no means a final deal
12The Budget Process
- The Legislatures role is to respond and develop
the budget - It still takes a 2/3 majority to pass
- A lot can change between now, the May Revise, and
budget enactment fiscally, socially,
politically - Outside and unforeseen factors can and will
significantly influence the final 2008-09 State
budget - Does not relieve a district from meeting the
State/Ed Code budget development timelines
13- EDUCATION COMMUNITY MUST
- ANTICIPATE AND PLAN FOR THE WORST
14The Budget Process
- Revenue Enhancements
- How much and in what form?
- Budget Flexibility
- What programs? How much?
- Length of the Budget Woes
- Will the State recover for 2009-2010? . . . or
- Continue or get worse?
- State budget timelines have no effect on the
State/Ed Code requirements school districts must
follow for adoption of their own local budgets
15The Budget Process
- Ed. Code March 15th preliminary layoff notices
- Ed. Code Classified notice of 45 or 60 days
- March 13th and April 24th board meetings
- RUSD 2008-09 budget being built right now
- Board adoption by June 30
- Uses best available information
- State budget and budget deals are not formulated
yet - In other words, we try to build an accurate
budget on a yet to be determined State budget
that we anticipate will be built on different
assumptions - What happens if we ignore the Governors proposed
budget and we move forward with little or no cuts?
16Action Plan
- As of March 4, the budget plan that follows is an
aggressive response that stretches the envelope
for savings to be realized from each of the
classifications - Not all savings may be realized
- Unforeseen expenses could go up
- Uncertainty of the State budget
- Uncertainty of State revenues
- January revenues were down 2.4, or 277 Million
over projections - These uncertainties, in all likelihood, will lead
to a dollar deficit higher than current
projections
17Action Plan Step 12007-2008
- Site Department recapture of 2007-08 budgets
- School sites recapture 25, with a 20,000
maximum - BE 6,000 RCS 6,106 MW 20,000
- HE 10,266 RHS 11,831 OP 6,942
- MHS 1,050 FB 0 RE 6,011
- MVA 2,025 JD 9,362
-
- Department recaptures
- Supt. 17,000
- Admin. Services 75,000
- Ed Services 40,000
- Total Dollars 200,000
- These are one-time dollars
18Action Plan Step 22007-2008
- Savings from unfilled positions
- Shift cost into categorical programs
- Budgeted expenses pulled from budget
- 534,000 total dollars to be used for next years
crisis - Most are one-time dollars
19Action Plan Step 32008-2009
- Recapture of 0.5 2007-2008 revenue limit
reduction as proposed by San Diego County Office
of Education and School Services of California - Was part of the Governors proposal in January to
reduce K-12 Education by 360 Million - Recently passed legislation did not reduce the
revenue limit - 134,000 cost reduction
20Action Plan Step 42008-2009
- Transfer of expenses from general fund to
categorical programs - Student support services technician salary
- Percentage of custodial salaries
- 1 FTE Salary of Education Services Teacher On
Assignment - 136,000 cost shift
21Action Plan Step 52008-2009
- Others
- Mega item transfers
- Cafeteria
- School Library Improvement Program
- Discontinue institutional memberships
- Coalition for Adequate School Housing, National
School Boards Association, Coalition of Declining
School Districts, North County Professional
Development Federation, Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development - Discontinue electrical overrides
- Change in Student Information System
- Reduction in expenses for retiree incentives
- 267,000 cost shift/reduction
22Action Plan Step 62008-2009
- Administrative Leadership Team (ALT) Personnel
- Not filling Purchasing Supervisor position
- Reassign Director of Maintenance, Operations and
Transportation position to Director of
Transportation - Leave Supervisor of Transportation position open
- 80,000 cost reduction
23Action PlanStep 72008-2009
- Classified Personnel
- 1 Grounds position - leave position vacant
- Fiscal Department - leave position vacant
- 3 FTE classified positions - layoff
- 1 FTE Custodian position - layoff
- 1 FTE Custodian position - to be paid by Extended
School Program - Reconfigure Secretary III position in Pupil
Services - 354,000 cost reduction
24Action Plan Step 82008-2009
- Certificated Personnel
- 15.26 FTE reduction in forces
- In addition to the 9 FTE elementary teachers due
to declining enrollment or other staffing
considerations - 994,000 cost reduction
25Bottom Line
- Total cuts, shift of expenses, and use of
one-time dollars - 2,699,000
- Use of set-aside for 2008-09 budget
- 800,000
- Total
- 3,499,000
- Projected deficit
- 2,902,000
- Again, based upon Governors Budget Proposal and
a 14.5 Billion deficit
26Bottom Line
- Projected deficit 2,902,000
- Proposed plan 3,499,000
- Difference 597,000
- Potential compensation adjustment 444,446
2007/08 and 2008/09 impact - 11 increase in loss of revenue, or 134,702
- 17,852 net flexibility to address unrealized
cost reductions, unanticipated expenditures
and/or an increase in the size of the State
deficit