20082009 Budget Crisis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

20082009 Budget Crisis

Description:

Failure of prior State budgets to come to terms with the structural budget gap. Failure to set dollars aside for ... No help from the Feds (bifurcated COLA) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: ramon6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 20082009 Budget Crisis


1
2008-2009 Budget Crisis
  • Ramona Unified School District
  • March 4, 2008

2
State Fiscal Crisis
  • Weakness in the State economy and revenues
  • Failure of prior State budgets to come to terms
    with the structural budget gap
  • Failure to set dollars aside for eventual
    downturn in the economy
  • Inability of economy to outgrow the problem
  • Faulty assumptions in the current budget resulted
    in a 14.5 Billion (now 16.1) deficit for
    2008-09
  • 16.1 Billion deficit is an 11 increase in the
    projected deficit problem
  • Governor has declared it will be dealt with by
    strictly making across-the-board cuts

3
2007-2008 (Current Year)
  • Governor proposed 360 Million current year
    reduction to K-12 Education
  • Governor believed this would come from sweeping
    up unspent categorical funds
  • However, Schools Services of California, along
    with FCMAT, believed the Governor would only get
    half from the sweep and the other half would have
    to come from a 0.5 reduction to revenue limit,
    or about 134,000 for RUSD
  • Delay in the second principal apportionment from
    July until September, which creates a cash flow
    issue for schools
  • Tighten current RUSD budget, keep positions open,
    limit spending to soften the potential cut and/or
    to help in 2008-09

4
2007-2008 (Current Year)Update
  • 507 Million has been taken away from Education
  • The cuts, so far, have been away from the general
    fund
  • No certainty more 2007-08 cuts wont occur
  • Delay will occur in the July and August advanced
    principal apportionment until September, creating
    a cash flow issue for schools districts
  • January revenues were 277 Million, or 2.4 below
    projections

5
Governors Proposed 2008-2009 Budget
  • Increase COLA to revenue limit and categorical
    programs
  • Deficit of 6.99 applied to increased revenue
    limit
  • Net effect is a 2.4 reduction to the revenue
    limit from the 2007-08 base
  • Most categorical programs have a net loss of
    about 6.5 from the 2007-08 base

6
Governors Proposed 2008-2009 Budget
  • Special Education is especially hit hard
  • No COLA
  • A 6.5 cut from prior year levels
  • Increased costs
  • No help from the Feds (bifurcated COLA)
  • Required services have to be maintained and the
    funding has been reduced
  • Any shortfall in funding will have to come from
    the general fund
  • Losses to State total more than 4 Billion
  • To maintain programs, such as Special Education,
    class size reduction, transportation, etc., cuts
    will need to be backfilled from school districts
    general funds

7
RUSD Impact on 2008-2009 Budget
  • Loss in Revenues
  • Revenue Limit 880,759 2.4
  • Class Size Red. 119,635 6.5
  • Transportation 33,224 6.5
  • Special Ed. 190,950 6.5
  • Total Loss in Revenues 1,224,568

8
RUSD Impact on 2008-2009 Budget
  • Increased Expenses
  • Step/Column 742,342 2
  • Util./Ins. Increase 106,387 5
  • Health Benefit 679,000 14
  • Ongoing Operational 150,000
  • Total Increase in Expenses 1,677,729

9
RUSD Impact on 2008-2009 Budget
  • Decrease in Revenues 1,224,568
  • Increase in Expenses 1,677,729
  • Total Deficit 2,902,297
  • Set-Aside for 2008-09 800,000
  • Total Deficit for 2008-09 2,102,297

10
RUSD Impact on 2008-2009 Budget
  • If the deficit is 16.1 Billion, or an 11
    increase in the State deficit, this could
    translate into an additional shortfall of
    134,702 to RUSD, for a total of 1,359,270 in
    decreased revenues
  • Potential Compensation Adjustment Should the
    District and all employee groups agree on
    compensation adjustments, the cost impact could
    be 220,000 in 2007-08 and slightly higher in
    2008-09 -- approximately 224,446 -- for a total
    net expense impact of 444,446

11
The Budget Process
  • The Governors January proposal is the start of a
    long deliberation among many parties
  • It reflects the Administration's general policy
    intent for the fiscal year
  • But it is by no means a final deal

12
The Budget Process
  • The Legislatures role is to respond and develop
    the budget
  • It still takes a 2/3 majority to pass
  • A lot can change between now, the May Revise, and
    budget enactment fiscally, socially,
    politically
  • Outside and unforeseen factors can and will
    significantly influence the final 2008-09 State
    budget
  • Does not relieve a district from meeting the
    State/Ed Code budget development timelines

13
  • EDUCATION COMMUNITY MUST
  • ANTICIPATE AND PLAN FOR THE WORST

14
The Budget Process
  • Revenue Enhancements
  • How much and in what form?
  • Budget Flexibility
  • What programs? How much?
  • Length of the Budget Woes
  • Will the State recover for 2009-2010? . . . or
  • Continue or get worse?
  • State budget timelines have no effect on the
    State/Ed Code requirements school districts must
    follow for adoption of their own local budgets

15
The Budget Process
  • Ed. Code March 15th preliminary layoff notices
  • Ed. Code Classified notice of 45 or 60 days
  • March 13th and April 24th board meetings
  • RUSD 2008-09 budget being built right now
  • Board adoption by June 30
  • Uses best available information
  • State budget and budget deals are not formulated
    yet
  • In other words, we try to build an accurate
    budget on a yet to be determined State budget
    that we anticipate will be built on different
    assumptions
  • What happens if we ignore the Governors proposed
    budget and we move forward with little or no cuts?

16
Action Plan
  • As of March 4, the budget plan that follows is an
    aggressive response that stretches the envelope
    for savings to be realized from each of the
    classifications
  • Not all savings may be realized
  • Unforeseen expenses could go up
  • Uncertainty of the State budget
  • Uncertainty of State revenues
  • January revenues were down 2.4, or 277 Million
    over projections
  • These uncertainties, in all likelihood, will lead
    to a dollar deficit higher than current
    projections

17
Action Plan Step 12007-2008
  • Site Department recapture of 2007-08 budgets
  • School sites recapture 25, with a 20,000
    maximum
  • BE 6,000 RCS 6,106 MW 20,000
  • HE 10,266 RHS 11,831 OP 6,942
  • MHS 1,050 FB 0 RE 6,011
  • MVA 2,025 JD 9,362
  • Department recaptures
  • Supt. 17,000
  • Admin. Services 75,000
  • Ed Services 40,000
  • Total Dollars 200,000
  • These are one-time dollars

18
Action Plan Step 22007-2008
  • Savings from unfilled positions
  • Shift cost into categorical programs
  • Budgeted expenses pulled from budget
  • 534,000 total dollars to be used for next years
    crisis
  • Most are one-time dollars

19
Action Plan Step 32008-2009
  • Recapture of 0.5 2007-2008 revenue limit
    reduction as proposed by San Diego County Office
    of Education and School Services of California
  • Was part of the Governors proposal in January to
    reduce K-12 Education by 360 Million
  • Recently passed legislation did not reduce the
    revenue limit
  • 134,000 cost reduction

20
Action Plan Step 42008-2009
  • Transfer of expenses from general fund to
    categorical programs
  • Student support services technician salary
  • Percentage of custodial salaries
  • 1 FTE Salary of Education Services Teacher On
    Assignment
  • 136,000 cost shift

21
Action Plan Step 52008-2009
  • Others
  • Mega item transfers
  • Cafeteria
  • School Library Improvement Program
  • Discontinue institutional memberships
  • Coalition for Adequate School Housing, National
    School Boards Association, Coalition of Declining
    School Districts, North County Professional
    Development Federation, Association for
    Supervision and Curriculum Development
  • Discontinue electrical overrides
  • Change in Student Information System
  • Reduction in expenses for retiree incentives
  • 267,000 cost shift/reduction

22
Action Plan Step 62008-2009
  • Administrative Leadership Team (ALT) Personnel
  • Not filling Purchasing Supervisor position
  • Reassign Director of Maintenance, Operations and
    Transportation position to Director of
    Transportation
  • Leave Supervisor of Transportation position open
  • 80,000 cost reduction

23
Action PlanStep 72008-2009
  • Classified Personnel
  • 1 Grounds position - leave position vacant
  • Fiscal Department - leave position vacant
  • 3 FTE classified positions - layoff
  • 1 FTE Custodian position - layoff
  • 1 FTE Custodian position - to be paid by Extended
    School Program
  • Reconfigure Secretary III position in Pupil
    Services
  • 354,000 cost reduction

24
Action Plan Step 82008-2009
  • Certificated Personnel
  • 15.26 FTE reduction in forces
  • In addition to the 9 FTE elementary teachers due
    to declining enrollment or other staffing
    considerations
  • 994,000 cost reduction

25
Bottom Line
  • Total cuts, shift of expenses, and use of
    one-time dollars
  • 2,699,000
  • Use of set-aside for 2008-09 budget
  • 800,000
  • Total
  • 3,499,000
  • Projected deficit
  • 2,902,000
  • Again, based upon Governors Budget Proposal and
    a 14.5 Billion deficit

26
Bottom Line
  • Projected deficit 2,902,000
  • Proposed plan 3,499,000
  • Difference 597,000
  • Potential compensation adjustment 444,446
    2007/08 and 2008/09 impact
  • 11 increase in loss of revenue, or 134,702
  • 17,852 net flexibility to address unrealized
    cost reductions, unanticipated expenditures
    and/or an increase in the size of the State
    deficit
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com