Title: MASSIVE NEUTRINOS AND COSMOLOGY
1MASSIVE NEUTRINOS AND COSMOLOGY
?
Electroweak Interactions and Unified
Theories, Moriond 2005
2The Cosmic Neutrino Background
3Relic neutrinos influence several cosmological
epochs
4Neutrinos as Dark Matter
- Neutrinos are natural DM candidates
- They stream freely until non-relativistic
(collisionless phase mixing)
Neutrinos are HOT Dark Matter - First structures to be formed when Universe
became matter -dominated - Ruled out by structure formation CDM
Neutrino Free Streaming
n
F
b, cdm
5Neutrinos as Dark Matter
- Neutrinos are natural DM candidates
- They stream freely until non-relativistic
(collisionless phase mixing)
Neutrinos are HOT Dark Matter - First structures to be formed when Universe
became matter -dominated - HDM ruled out by structure formation
CDM
6Neutrinos as Hot Dark Matter
Massive Neutrinos can still be subdominant DM
limits on m? from Structure Formation (combined
with other cosmological data)
- Effect of Massive Neutrinos suppression of
Power at small scales
7CMB DATA INCREASING PRECISION
8Galaxy Redshift Surveys
SDSS
1300 Mpc
9Power Spectrum of density fluctuations
10Power spectrum of density fluctuations
Bias b2(k)Pg(k)/Pm(k)
Non-linearity
2dFGRS
11Neutrinos as Hot Dark Matter
Massive Neutrinos can still be subdominant DM
limits on m? from Structure Formation (combined
with other cosmological data)
- Effect of Massive Neutrinos suppression of
Power at small scales
12Effect of massive neutrinos on the CMB and Matter
Power Spectra
Max Tegmark www.hep.upenn.edu/max/
13Cosmological bounds on neutrino mass(es)
A unique cosmological bound on m? DOES NOT exist !
- Different analyses have found upper bounds on
neutrino masses, but they depend on - The assumed cosmological model number of
parameters (problem of parameter degeneracies) - The combination of cosmological data used
14Cosmological Parameters example
SDSS Coll, PRD 69 (2004) 103501
15Cosmological Data
- CMB Temperature WMAP plus data from other
experiments at large multipoles (CBI,ACBAR,VSA) - CMB Polarization WMAP
- Large Scale Structure
- Galaxy Clustering (2dF,SDSS)
- Bias (Galaxy, ) Amplitude of the Matter P(k)
(SDSS,s8) - Lyman-a forest independent measurement of
power on small scales - Priors on parameters from other data SNIa (Om),
HST (h),
16Neutrino masses in 3-neutrino schemes
From present evidences of atmospheric and solar
neutrino oscillations
eV
solar
atm
atm
solar
3 degenerate massive neutrinos Sm? 3m0
17Neutrino masses in 3-neutrino schemes
18Absolute mass scale searches
19Cosmological bounds on neutrino mass since 2003
20Neutrino masses in 3-neutrino schemes
Currently disfavored
21Global analysis ? oscillations tritium ?
decay 0?2? Cosmology
Fogli et al., PRD 70 (2004) 113003
CMB 2dF
22Future sensitivities to Sm?
- Next CMB data from WMAP and PLANCK ( other CMB
experiments on large ls) temperature and
polarization spectra - SDSS galaxy survey 106 galaxies (250,000 for
2dF) - Fisher matrix analysis expected sensitivities
assuming a fiducial cosmological model - Forecast analysis for
- WMAP and O?0 models
Hu et al, PRL 80 (1998) 5255
Recent update Lesgourgues, SP Perotto, PRD
70 (2004) 045016 Fiducial cosmological
model (Obh2 , Omh2 , h , ns , t, Sm? ) (0.0245
, 0.148 , 0.70 , 0.98 , 0.12, Sm? )
23PLANCKSDSS
2? sensitivity
Fiducial value
0.21 eV (PLANCKSDSS) 0.13 eV (CMBpolSDSS)
Sm detectable at 2s if larger than
Lesgourgues, SP Perotto, PRD 70 (2004) 045016
24Future sensitivities to Sm? new ideas
galaxy weak lensing and CMB lensing
no bias uncertainty small scales in linear regime
makes CMB sensitive to much smaller masses
25Future sensitivities to Sm? new ideas
galaxy weak lensing and CMB lensing
sensitivity of future weak lensing
survey (4000º)2 to m? s(m?) 0.1 eV Abazajian
Dodelson PRL 91 (2003) 041301
sensitivity of CMB (primary lensing) to
m? s(m?) 0.15 eV (Planck) s(m?) 0.04 eV
(CMBpol) Kaplinghat, Knox Song PRL 91 (2003)
241301
26Conclusions
Cosmological observables efficiently constrain
some properties of (relic) neutrinos
?
Bounds on the sum of neutrino masses from CMB
2dFGRS or SDSS, and other cosmological data (best
Sm?lt0.42 eV, conservative Sm?lt1 eV)
Sub-eV sensitivity in the next future (0.1-0.2
eV and better) ? Test degenerate mass region and
eventually the IH case