CLASS NO. 14 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

CLASS NO. 14

Description:

Deter police vs. Cost of excluding evidence 'Suspect goes free because of constable's blunder' ... Court decides when it is applied. Not automatic remedy for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: lauriele
Category:
Tags: class | constable

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CLASS NO. 14


1
CLASS NO. 14
  • Exclusionary Rule

2
What should happen if there is a violation of
constl rights?
  • Sue police for violation
  • Disciplinary action against police
  • Do nothing?
  • Exclusionary rule

3
Exclusionary Rule
  • Judicially-created remedy
  • Weeks (1914) Applied to Fed. Courts
  • Wolf (1949) Rejected for States
  • Mapp (1961) Applied to States

4
Rationale for Exclusionary Rule
  • Deter improper police behavior
  • Balancing of interests
  • Deter police vs. Cost of excluding evidence
  • Suspect goes free because of constables blunder

5
Application of Exclusionary Rule
  • Court decides when it is applied
  • Not automatic remedy for all constl violations
  • Applies to 4th A. violations
  • Court can make exceptions
  • Doesnt apply to all rule violations
  • States can have own exclusionary rules

6
Suppression Hearings
  • File motion with affidavits
  • Hearing to decide credibility
  • Court can decide some issues on paper
  • Franks v. Delaware
  • Deliberate falsehoods or reckless disregard for
    truth
  • Material misrepresentation

7
Standing
  • No automatic standing
  • Constl violations are based on violations of
    personal expectations of privacy
  • Must have legitimate expectation of privacy in
    area searched or non-contraband item seized

8
Standing Rules
  • No standing just because evidence will be used
    against you
  • No standing b/c target of investigation
  • Reasonable expectation of privacy
  • Overnight visitors Yes
  • Casual visitors (even if legitimately on
    premises) No
  • Standing for rental properties
  • Disassociating from property

9
Standing in Car Search Cases
  • Owner of car Yes
  • Driver of car - ??
  • Passenger Only of personal items that are not
    contraband

10
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
  • Dont suppress people (Kerr-Frisbie)
  • Suppressing derivative evidence

11
Wong Sun Doctrine
  • Violation of Toys rights oral statement
  • Suppress
  • Drugs from Yee
  • Cannot use against Toy
  • Wong Suns confession
  • Can be used

12
Tainted Statements
  • E.g., Illegal arrest ? take to station and
    get confession Brown v. Ill.
  • Confession is fruit of poisonous tree unless
    taint dissipated
  • Time gap
  • Not serious violation
  • Ds consent

13
More Exceptions to Exclusionary Rule
  • Independent Source
  • Inevitable Discovery
  • Impeachment
  • Good Faith Exception
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com