What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal of a perfect square to an edge - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal of a perfect square to an edge

Description:

What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal of a perfect square to an edge? ... proof was adapted from Tom Apostol: 'Irrationality of the Square Root of Two: A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: keitht4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal of a perfect square to an edge


1
What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal
of a perfect square to an edge?
2
What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal
of a perfect square to an edge?
3
What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal
of a perfect square to an edge?
  • The white area in the top square is (a2)/2.

4
What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal
of a perfect square to an edge?
  • The white area in the top square is (a2)/2.
  • So the white area in the lower square is 2a2.

5
What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal
of a perfect square to an edge?
  • The white area in the top square is (a2)/2.
  • So the white area in the lower square is 2a2. But
    this area can also be expressed as b2.

6
What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal
of a perfect square to an edge?
  • The white area in the top square is (a2)/2.
  • So the white area in the lower square is 2a2. But
    this area can also be expressed as b2.
  • Thus, b2 2a2.

7
What is the ratio of the length of the diagonal
of a perfect square to an edge?
  • The white area in the top square is (a2)/2.
  • So the white area in the lower square is 2a2. But
    this area can also be expressed as b2.
  • Thus, b2 2a2.
  • Or, (b/a)2 2.

8
We conclude that the ratio of the diagonal to
the edge of a square is the square root of 2,
which can be written as v2 or 21/2.
9
  • So v2 is with us whenever a perfect square is.

10
  • So v2 is with us whenever a perfect square is.
  • For a period of time, the ancient Greek
    mathematicians believed any two distances are
    commensurate (can be co-measured).

11
  • So v2 is with us whenever a perfect square is.
  • For a period of time, the ancient Greek
    mathematicians believed any two distances are
    commensurate (can be co-measured).
  • For a perfect square this means a unit of
    measurement can be found so that the side and
    diagonal of the square are both integer multiples
    of the unit.

12
  • This means v2 would be the ratio of two integers.

13
  • This means v2 would be the ratio of two
    integers.
  • A ratio of two integers is called a rational
    number.

14
  • This means v2 would be the ratio of two
    integers.
  • A ratio of two integers is called a rational
    number.
  • To their great surprise, the Greeks discovered v2
    is not rational.

15
  • This means v2 would be the ratio of two
    integers.
  • A ratio of two integers is called a rational
    number.
  • To their great surprise, the Greeks discovered v2
    is not rational.
  • Real numbers that are not rational are now called
    irrational.

16
  • This means v2 would be the ratio of two
    integers.
  • A ratio of two integers is called a rational
    number.
  • To their great surprise, the Greeks discovered v2
    is not rational.
  • Real numbers that are not rational are now called
    irrational.
  • We believe v2 was the very first number known to
    be irrational. This discovery forced a rethinking
    of what number means.

17
  • We will present a proof that v2 is not rational.

18
  • We will present a proof that v2 is not rational.
  • Proving a negative statement usually must be done
    by assuming the logical opposite and arriving at
    a contradictory conclusion.

19
  • We will present a proof that v2 is not rational.
  • Proving a negative statement usually must be done
    by assuming the logical opposite and arriving at
    a contradictory conclusion.
  • Such an argument is called a proof by
    contradiction.

20
Theorem There is no rational number whose square
is 2.
21
Theorem There is no rational number whose square
is 2.
  • Proof Assume, to the contrary, that v2 is
    rational.

22
Theorem There is no rational number whose square
is 2.
  • Proof Assume, to the contrary, that v2 is
    rational.
  • So we can write v2 n/m with n and m positive
    integers.

23
Theorem There is no rational number whose square
is 2.
  • Proof Assume, to the contrary, that v2 is
    rational.
  • So we can write v2 n/m with n and m positive
    integers.
  • Among all the fractions representing v2, we
    select the one with smallest denominator.

24
  • So if v2 is rational (v2 n/m) then an isosceles
    right triangle with legs of length m will have
    hypotenuse of length n v2m.

n v2m
25
  • So if v2 is rational (v2 n/m) then an isosceles
    right triangle with legs of length m will have
    hypotenuse of length n v2m.
  • Moreover, for a fixed unit, we can take ?ABC to
    be the smallest isosceles right triangle with
    integer length sides.

n v2m
26
  • Now, for the basic trick. Bisect the angle at A
    and fold the edge AB along the edge AC.

27
  • Now, for the basic trick. Bisect the angle at A
    and fold the edge AB along the edge AC.

28
  • Now, for the basic trick. Bisect the angle at A
    and fold the edge AB along the edge AC.
  • This creates a new triangle ?DEC with the angle
    at E being a right angle and the angle at C still
    being 45.

29
  • Now, for the basic trick. Bisect the angle at A
    and fold the edge AB along the edge AC.
  • This creates a new triangle ?DEC with the angle
    at E being a right angle and the angle at C still
    being 45.
  • AEABm

30
  • Now, for the basic trick. Bisect the angle at A
    and fold the edge AB along the edge AC.
  • This creates a new triangle ?DEC with the angle
    at E being a right angle and the angle at C still
    being 45.
  • AEABn
  • ECAC-AE

31
  • Now, for the basic trick. Bisect the angle at A
    and fold the edge AB along the edge AC.
  • This creates a new triangle ?DEC with the angle
    at E being a right angle and the angle at C still
    being 45.
  • AEABn
  • ECAC-AEn-m

32
  • Now, for the basic trick. Bisect the angle at A
    and fold the edge AB along the edge AC.
  • This creates a new triangle ?DEC with the angle
    at E being a right angle and the angle at C still
    being 45.
  • AEABn
  • ECAC-AEn-m
  • BDDE

33
  • Now, for the basic trick. Bisect the angle at A
    and fold the edge AB along the edge AC.
  • This creates a new triangle ?DEC with the angle
    at E being a right angle and the angle at C still
    being 45.
  • AEABn
  • ECAC-AEn-m
  • BDDEECn-m

34
  • But, if
  • BDDEECn-m
  • and BCm,

35
  • But, if
  • BDDEECn-m
  • and BCm, then
  • DCBC-BD

36
  • But, if
  • BDDEECn-m
  • and BCm, then
  • DCBC-BDm-(n-m)

37
  • But, if
  • BDDEECn-m
  • and BCm, then
  • DCBC-BDm-(n-m)2m-n.

38
  • But, if
  • BDDEECn-m
  • and BCm, then
  • DCBC-BDm-(n-m)2m-n.

39
  • But, if
  • BDDEECn-m
  • and BCm, then
  • DCBC-BDm-(n-m)2m-n.
  • Since n and m are integers, n-m and 2m-n are
    integers and ?DEC is an isosceles right triangle
    with integer side lengths smaller than ?ABC .

40
  • This contradicts our choice of ?ABC as the
    smallest isosceles right triangle with integer
    side lengths for a given fixed unit of length.

41
  • This contradicts our choice of ?ABC as the
    smallest isosceles right triangle with integer
    side lengths for a given fixed unit of length.
  • This means our assumption that v2 is rational is
    false.
  • Thus there is no rational number whose square is
    2.
  • QED

42
  • This beautiful proof was adapted from Tom
    Apostol Irrationality of the Square Root of
    Two A Geometric Proof, American Mathematical
    Monthly,107, 841-842 (2000).

43
  • This beautiful proof was adapted from Tom
    Apostol Irrationality of the Square Root of
    Two A Geometric Proof, American Mathematical
    Monthly,107, 841-842 (2000).

Behold, v2 is irrational!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com