Title: Group Exercise: Quadrant Analysis
1Group Exercise Quadrant Analysis
- Value-Added Summer Workshop
- July 28th 2009
2Purpose of Exercise
- Examine Value-Added with the added dimension of
Attainment - Understand exactly what interpretations can and
cannot be made regarding the data - Discuss policy implications regarding the four
quadrants of value-added and attainment data
3Exercise Format
- Divide into four sub-groups representing each of
the four quadrants - Quadrant 1 (High Value-Added, High Attainment)
- Quadrant 2 (High Value-Added, Low Attainment)
- Quadrant 3 (Low Value-Added, High Attainment)
- Quadrant 4 (Low Value-Added, Low Attainment)
4Exercise Format
- For each quadrant discussion
- 5-10 minute sub-group discussion
- Report from the sub-group representing the
quadrants school team - Group discussion
- Key Points
5Quadrant Analysis
- The mapping of value-added and attainment data in
one graphic.
6Quadrant Analysis
- Mapping can be done using either the state or
district as the reference point. - Data plots can be for districts (state
value-added system), - or for schools, grades or classrooms (either a
state or district value-added system)
7Quadrant Analysis
- Attainment data can be utilized from either the
pre-test or the post-test. - The pre-test is the preferred choice, since it is
a pre-growth measure.
8Quadrant Analysis
- Perspectives of Policymakers
- SEA analyzing districts and/or schools (statewide
system) - Superintendent analyzing schools
- Principal assessing school and analyzing
grade-level performance
9Quadrant Analysis
- Plotting Value-Added data
- The following graphic address the nature of
standard deviations and the application of
quadrants to the data.
10Value-Added vs. Attainment
Plotting Value-Added
Tier Values
11Quadrant Analysis
- Various Representations
- Quadrants
- Iron Cross (Standard Deviation bars)
- Nine Box
12(No Transcript)
13Quadrant 1 High Value-Added, High Attainment
- Be careful to accurately interpret the data.
- Characteristics
- These are schools (could also be districts or
grades) that are both high value-added and high
attaining.
14Quadrant 1 High Value-Added, High Attainment
- Questions
- Are all Quadrant 1 schools equal?
- What does it mean to be within one of the
standard deviation bars? - What does it mean to be within both of the
standard deviation bars? - While the standard deviation bars help to gauge
to meaningfulness of the school position in the
quadrant, what part of the story is still
missing?
15Quadrant 1 High Value-Added, High Attainment
- Quadrant 1 School Team Report
16Quadrant 1 High Value-Added, High Attainment
- Key Points
- It is critical that policymakers understand the
dangers of over-interpreting the data. - Expert Perspective
- Michael Christian, Assistant Scientist, VARC
17Quadrant 3 Low Value-Added, High Attainment
- The Ceiling Effect Myth
- Characteristics
- Prior to value-added data, these high attaining
schools had no reason to believe they were
anything but highly successful. - In reality their high attainment has little to do
with the impact of the school. - Some might refer to these schools as coasters,
resting on the outside influences that lead to
student attainment.
18Quadrant 3 Low Value-Added, High Attainment
- Questions
- Why might the introduction of value-added to
schools from this quadrant be a particularly
painful process? - Some would argue that because they are already
high attaining schools, Quadrant 3 schools face a
more difficult challenge in achieving high
value-added status. Might there exist a ceiling
effect that is curtailing their ability to be
high value-added schools.?
19Quadrant 3 Low Value-Added, High Attainment
- Quadrant 3 School Team Report
20Quadrant 3 Low Value-Added, High Attainment
- Key Points
- There is no ceiling effect.
- Expert Perspective
- Brad Carl, Associate Researcher, VARC
21Quadrant 2 High Value-Added, Low Attainment
- The Equitable Nature of Growth
- Characteristics
- When only viewing attainment data these schools
(could also be districts or grades) are deemed to
be failing.
22Quadrant 2 High Value-Added, Low Attainment
- Questions
- Does attainment data alone paint an accurate
picture of schools falling into Quadrant 2? If
not, why not? - Is there any benefit to studying the school
culture and curriculum programs of schools from
Quadrant 2? - Is it enough to simply be a high value-added
school? Can we expect Quadrant 2 schools to
eventually become Quadrant 1 schools?
23Quadrant 2 High Value-Added, Low Attainment
- Quadrant 2 School Team Report
24Quadrant 2 High Value-Added, Low Attainment
- Key Points
- It is critical that we recognize the success
these schools are having regarding value-added.
25Quadrant 4 Low Value-Added, Low Attainment
- The kids cant learn.
- Characteristics
- These are the most challenged of schools (could
also be districts or grades), for they are
neither high value-added nor high attaining.
26Quadrant 4 Low Value-Added, Low Attainment
- Questions
- While value-added allows for an apples to
apples comparison of schools (meaning that
schools from any of the quadrants can be utilized
as relevant examples), why might Quadrant 2
schools serve as a more palatable example for
schools from Quadrant 4? - From a Superintendents perspective, how might
schools from Quadrant 4 be viewed regarding the
use of district resources?
27Quadrant 4 Low Value-Added, Low Attainment
- Questions (Continued)
- Say a Principal has just reviewed the quadrant
plot for her school and sees that the school has
moved from a Quadrant 1 school last year to a
Quadrant 3 or a Quadrant 4 school this year. How
might looking at a schools grade-level
value-added plots be helpful in possibly
diagnosing the change?
28Quadrant 4 Low Value-Added, Low Attainment
- Quadrant 4 School Team Report
29Quadrant 4 Low Value-Added, Low Attainment
- Key Points
- Low attainment is no excuse for being low
value-added. Regardless of starting point, all
kids are capable of growth.
30Value-Added Tutorials
- Very soon well be making live a new section of
the VARC website. Please do be sure to visit - varc.wceruw.org/tutorials