Pharma Licensing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Pharma Licensing

Description:

Estimated Annual Sales of Major Brands Losing Patent Protection 1. ... a superior, more palatable product with a significantly lower dose than the original product ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:977
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: jeannec4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pharma Licensing


1
Pharma Licensing Case Studies Pointers
Dr. Richie Paul Director, Intellectual
Property Elan Drug Technologies
  • IP Summit Ireland 2008, February 2008

2
Major Products are Losing Patent Protection with
Reformulation Opportunities for Both Innovator
and Specialty Pharma
Estimated Annual Sales of Major Brands Losing
Patent Protection 1.
96B worth of pharmaceutical products will go
off patent from 2007-2012 and by 2016 it will be
140B in sales.2
  • Sources
  • Merrill Lynch Industry Report, Jan 06.
  • Datamonitor Report, 2007.

3
It is Becoming Increasingly Difficult and
Expensive to Develop New Drugs Reformulations
are Cost Effective
US NDA Drug Approvals (2003-2006)3.
New ester, salt or non-covalent derivative,
new formulation, OTC switch and/or new
combination. Over two-thirds of FDA product
approvals are for reformulations (note generics
not included in count)
  • Sources
  • 1. TUFTS Centre for Study of Drug Development
    website
  • 2. Defending brand revenue - Pharmaceutical
    Lifecycle management planning, June 2005 -
    Cutting Edge Information Report
  • 3. FDA website

4
Technology Providers can a Play Role in Both
Enabling NCE-based Products and Lifecycle
Management
  • Key issue developing a flexible sustainable
    licensing approach that allows you to
    simultaneously
  • Account for the needs of different clients
  • Make a profit from enabling (other peoples)
    products
  • Technology must provide an advantage over the
    competition
  • Different revenue streams
  • Continue to develop your technology base
  • RD efforts
  • Control development rights
  • Fend off imitators
  • Enforcement of IPR
  • Limit the prospects of licensees becoming
    competitors

5
Case Studies Based on Different Technologies
Developed at Elan
  • ProStepTM / Nicotine patch Launched in 1992,
    marketed in US by Wyeth
  • Pioneering product in nicotine replacement
    therapy
  • Industry / university collaboration
  • Avinza / Once-a-day CR morphine Launched by
    Ligand in 2002
  • Controlled release form matches pain coverage of
    twice-a-day products
  • Fast onset minimizes fluctuation in blood levels
  • Emend (aprepitant NCD) NCE launched by Merck
    in 2003
  • Elimination of food requirement for drug (drug
    would otherwise have been abandoned) with 600
    improvement in bioavailability
  • Megace ES (megestrol acetate NCD) LCM launched
    by Par in 2005
  • Equivalent efficacy achieved with dramatically
    lower dosage strength
  • Easier administration

6
Case Study 1. ProStepTM - nicotine transdermal
patch
  • An early example of successful industry /
    university collaboration in Ireland
  • Patch RD and clinical development carried out in
    conjunction with Chemistry Department and School
    of Pharmacy at Trinity College
  • Marketing rights out-licensed
  • Acknowledging each partys strengths and
    priorities, and having appropriate procedures in
    place
  • US 4,946853 Elan Transdermal Ltd Method for
    the treatment of withdrawal symptoms associated
    with smoking cessation and preparation for use in
    said method
  • Transdermal delivery of nicotine in normal human
    volunteers a single dose and multiple dose
    study Y. B. Bannon et al Eur J Clin Pharmacol
    (1989) 37 285-290
  • Managing the relationship(s) - importance of
    having good communication with inventors you
    might need them!
  • Roles responsibilities in litigation

7
Case Study 2. Avinza - once-a-day morphine
  • Morphine, while a well-known and trusted
    analgesic
  • has a short half-life
  • break-though pain is a significant problem
  • no product offered true once-daily dosing
  • fed fasted variability
  • not suitable for monotherapy - did not have a
    fast onset of action coupled with full day
    relief      
  • Using its proprietary SODAS technology Elan
    developed a controlled release (CR) once-a-day
    morphine formulation differentiated by
  • true once daily CR achieved, with therapeutic
    plasma levels maintained for 24 hours
  • immediate release component enables fast onset of
    action, eliminating need for co-administration of
    fast acting product

Avinza is a registered trade mark of King
Pharmaceuticals Research Development,
Inc SODAS is a registered trade mark of Elan
Pharma International Limtied
8
Case Study 2. Avinza - once-a-day
morphineBenefits to patients
9
Case Study 2. Avinza - once-a-day morphine
Benefits to Commercial Partner
  • The once daily morphine product was launched by
    Ligand in 2002 now marketed by King
    Pharmaceuticals
  • Patented formulation with clear marketable
    advantages over other oral products

Avinza US Sales1. (USMM)
1. Source IMS US audited ex-factory sales
10
Case Study 2. Avinza - once-a-day morphine
  • Even with patent protection, dont dismiss the
    value of know-how other competitive advantages
    (e.g. ability to work with controlled substances)
  • Licence should anticipate issues arising
    throughout the complete lifetime of the product
    (e.g. patent enforcement rights and
    responsibilities, assignment / transfer
    provisions, lifecycle management)

11
Case Study 3. Emend (aprepitant) - NCE
  • Aprepitant poorly water soluble NCE discovered
    by Merck for treating nausea induced by
    chemotherapy or surgery
  • NanoCrytsal technology used to overcome
    formulation challenges (which were such that
    product would have otherwise been shelved)

Emend is a registered trade mark of Merck Co,
Inc NanoCrystal is a registered trade mark of
Elan Pharma International Limited
12
Case Study 3. Emend (aprepitant) - NCE
  • An example of enabling technology
  • Be clear on who is responsible for what!
  • Regulatory / IP overlap
  • Reporting obligations
  • Separate, but complementary patent strategies
  • Rights obligations in patent prosecution,
    maintenance and enforcement
  • Step-in rights

Emend is a registered trade mark of Merck Co,
Inc NanoCrystal is a registered trade mark of
Elan Pharma International Limited
13
Case Study 4. Megace - Lifecycle Management
  • Megestrol - compound for treatment of anorexia
    and significant weight loss in patients with AIDS
    marketed by Par Pharmaceuticals however this
    compound used to stimulate appetite was
  • a thick viscous liquid that was difficult to
    swallow
  • 20ml a day had to be taken daily
  • had to be taken with food
  • Re-formulation with Elans NanoCrystal
    solubility enhancing technology, led to
  • a superior, more palatable product with a
    significantly lower dose than the original
    product
  • viscosity reduced 16 fold
  • volume swallowed reduced by 75
  • taken with or without food - a significant
    benefit for those with poor/no appetite

Megace is a registered trade mark of
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company licensed to Par
Pharmaceuticals, Inc
14
Improving quality of Life Through NanoCrystal
Technology Megace ES Case Study
15
Improving quality of Life Through NanoCrystal
Technology Megace ES Case Study
  • Pars first branded medication, marking
    strategic shift for the company
  • Par has hired own sales force to market Megace
    ES in US
  • Annual sales expected to reach 100M

16
Case Study 4 Megace - Lifecycle Management
  • Using lifecycle management to benefit patients
    and create new proprietary products
  • Clinical / Regulatory / IP overlap
  • different agreements for different stages of
    product development
  • who pays for what?
  • who owns what?
  • consequences of termination
  • Future LCM plays whos entitled to do what?

17
NanoCrystal Technology Platform
  • Proven innovation for poorly water-soluble
    compounds
  • Over US1.3bn annual in-market sales 1.
  • Large patent portfolio2.
  • Improvement in bioavailability of up to 6003.
  • 4 time reduction in dosage volume 4.
  • 10 fold maximum tolerated dose achieved in cancer
    drug 5.
  • Can reduce or eliminates fed-fasting effect 6.
  • Fast, elegant, simple solution for poorly water
    soluble compounds 7.
  • Applicable to any dosage form
  • underpinning extensive patenting licensing
    programmes
  • Sources
  • 1. 2005 sales of technology based marketed
    products in US
  • 2. 490 Issued patents in US, EU and Japan
  • 3. Emend bioavailability was improved by 600
  • 4. Megace ES dose reduced from 20ml to 5ml

5. Animal studies conducted by Elan in-house on
leading anti-cancer product 6. Eliminated/reduced
fed/fasted effect in TriCor and Emend ( a
registered trade mark of Fournier Industrie et
Sante SA) 7. TriCor reformulated and approved
within 36 months
18
Elans NanoCrystal Pipeline
19
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com