Risk Factors and Assessment of Prostate Cancer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Risk Factors and Assessment of Prostate Cancer

Description:

African American men have higher risk than white or Hispanic men ... Areas of induration or frank nodules on digital rectal examination suggestive of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:164
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: andylins
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Risk Factors and Assessment of Prostate Cancer


1
Risk Factors and Assessment of Prostate Cancer
  • Andy Linsenmeyer MS III

2
Epidemiology
  • Most commonly diagnosed visceral cancer
  • 3rd most common cause of cancer death in men
  • Represents 33 of cancers diagnosed annually

3
Risk Factors
  • Age-most important
  • Race and ethnicity
  • Genetics
  • Diet

4
Race and Ethnicity
  • African American men have higher risk than white
    or Hispanic men
  • African American men also have earlier age of
    onset, worse Gleason score, and more advanced
    stage at the time of diagnosis

5
Prostate cancer is more common in black men
SEER Database
6
Genetic Factors
  • Double the risk if a first degree relative is
    affected (brother, father)
  • 8q24 allele was found to confer a strong risk of
    developing prostate cancer
  • BCRA 1/2 mutation increases risk 2-5 fold

7
Genome-wide association study identifies a second
prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24
  • 7 genetic risk factors on 8q24 reliably predicted
    ones probability of prostate cancer
  • Almost all risk factors seen more frequently in
    African Americans
  • Could explain higher rate of disease in African
    Americans

8
Dietary Factors
  • High animal fat, low vegetable intake
  • Ca and Vitamin D
  • Possibly protective
  • Selenium
  • Vitamin E
  • Zinc
  • Soy intake

9
Age-specific (crude) SEER incidence rates by
'expanded' race for prostate cancer, males SEER
17 registries for 2000-2003
10
Clinical presentation
  • Usually asymptomatic, diagnosed by elevated PSA
  • Urinary urgency, nocturia, hesistancy, frequency
    more likely BPH
  • Uncommon sx include new onset erectile
    dysfunction, hematuria, hematospermia, or
    symptoms of metastatic disease

11
Digital Rectal Exam
  • Can detect tumors in lateral and posterior
    aspects of gland
  • Those not detected include T1s and the 25-35 in
    other parts of the gland
  • Areas of induration or frank nodules on digital
    rectal examination suggestive of cancer
  • PPV of 5-30
  • Consider biopsy even without elevated PSA

12
Anatomy
13
Physiology
  • Secretes milky alkaline fluid to protect and
    nourish sperm
  • 30-50 glands arranged into acini
  • Free testosterone converted to DHT by 5 alpha
    reductase
  • 2.5 time more potent than testosterone
  • Binds to androgen receptor in glandular cells
    stimulating growth
  • Divided into central, peripheral, and transition
    zones
  • Peripheral zone contains 65 of glandular tissue
    and therefore cancer most commonly originates
    there

14
PSA
  • Elevations can be caused by BPH most commonly,
    cancer, perineal trauma, prostatic inflammation,
  • 1. PSAgt10
  • Over 50 have cancer
  • 24-50 percent increase in having extraprostatic
    spread
  • BIOPSY

15
PSA
  • 2. PSA 4-10
  • Biopsy still recommended
  • Lower specificity
  • About 1 in 5 biopsies will reveal cancer
  • PPV of about 20

16
PSA
  • 3. PSAlt4
  • In 3 studies of men 50 or older with prostate
    cancer, 43 had PSA values of lt4
  • Higher likelihood of finding organ confined
    disease if PSA lt4
  • Biopsy should be considered in men with PSA as
    low as 2.6 if rate of increase is gt.75
    ng/ml/year.

17
Diagnosis
  • Biopsy is gold standard
  • Transrectal, office procedure, ultrasound guided
  • Either take 6 or 10-12 cores of tissue
  • 10-12 cores associated with higher rates of
    detection

18
Staging
  • Clinical staging-radionucliotide bone scan, CT
    scan, endorectal coil MRI
  • Major means of determining prognosis and
    selecting therapy
  • Gleason grade
  • Analyzes tumor histology, rates it 1 (well
    differentiated) to 5 poorly differentiated and
    then sum scores
  • TNM
  • Assigned c or clinical stage and p or
    pathological stage
  • T reflects size and location of tumor, N is nodal
    involvement, and M is metastasis

19
What treatment?
  • Consider
  • General medical condition
  • Gleason score and PSA
  • Clinical stage
  • Outcomes of alternative treatment
  • Side effects of treatment

20
General classes of therapy
  • Surgery
  • Radiation therapy
  • Androgen deprivation therapy
  • Active surveillance (watchful waiting)

21
Indications for Active Surveillance (ie watchful
waiting)
  • Old man (over 70-75)
  • Nonpalpable cancer
  • PSA density lt0.15 ng/ml per gram
  • Gleason scorelt6
  • Cancer in less than half of biopsy cores

22
Indication for operation
  • Radical prostatectomy, perineal prostatectomy,
    laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
  • Significant morbidity
  • Impotence, urinary incontinence
  • RT vs Operation dependent on patient preference
  • Younger men encouraged to have prostatectomy
    because of high recurrence risk with RT

23
Take Home Points
  • Very common
  • Age and African American race important risk
    factors
  • PSA useful for diagnosis
  • Best therapy dependent on patient to patient
    basis
  • No consensus on whether RT or surgery is better
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com