Title: Social Mobility
1Social Mobility Narrowing Social Class
Attainment GapsA summary of the evidence and
lessons for policy making
- Stephen Meek
- Director of Strategy, DfES
- 26 April 2006
2Overview of the work
- Extensive review of evidence to explore
What we know about social class attainment gaps?
What drives the attainment gap?What impact has
policy had, and what are the lessons for policy
making?
3Other countries experience confirms the nature
of the challenge, and shows that this issue is
not unique to the UK
Relationship between the average performance of
participating countries on the PISA reading
literacy scale and the socio-economic gap in
student performance 2000
Size of gap not inevitable, but Driven by deep
social factors more than structure of education
system (though feedback) Hardest to reach are
hard to reach.
4Creating a high-performance/high-equity system
reducing the attainment gap and increasing the
average level of attainment
Educational Attainment Levels in England Present
and Future (Indicative Only)
High
Average High SEG
Average High SEG
Average All
Gap
Average Low SEG
Attainment Levels
Average All
Gap
Average Low SEG
Low
NOW
THE FUTURE
Achieving both of those objectives simultaneously
is challenging
5What do we know about social class attainment
gaps? What drives the attainment gap?What
impact has policy had, and what are the lessons
for policy making?
6There is evidence of a social class attainment
gap at Foundation Stage
Percentage of 5 year olds achieving a good
level of development by the end of Foundation
Stage in schools in Sure Start areas compared
with all schools in England (national average)
2005 ()
7the attainment gap is similarly evident at
pupil-level across all Key Stages in School
Average Point Score for Pupils by Free
School Meal (FSM) Status for Key Stages 1 to 4
2005 (Points)
Key Stage 2
Key Stage 3
Key Stage 4(2)
Key Stage 1
8As well as increases in attainment, there has
been a minor narrowing of the gap at KS3 and 4,
though overall gap remains signficant
Change in Average Point Score for Pupils by Free
School Meal (FSM) Status for Key Stages 2, 3 and
4 (Points)
Key Stage 4 (2002 -2004)
Key Stage 2 (2002-2005)
Key Stage 3 (2002 -2004)
Minor widening
Points
Points
Points
Minor narrowing
Improvement
Improvement
Improvement
Minor narrowing
Non FSM
FSM
Total
Non FSM
FSM
Total
Non FSM
FSM
Total
(1)
9While prior attainment becomes increasingly
important, deprivation has impact at all
attainment levels
Proportion in FT Education at 16 by Year 11
Attainment and Parental Occupation Classification
(NS-SEC) 2003 ()
Prior Attainment at GCSE
10Unqualified school leavers who go on to acquire a
level 2 qualification have better job prospects
Employment rates of unqualified school leavers
who later attain against qualified school
leavers ()
11What do we know about social class attainment
gaps? What drives the attainment gap?What
impact has policy had, and what are the lessons
for policy making?
12Social factors are the biggest driver of the
attainment gap but our educational levers are
stronger
- The most significant factors behind a childs
achievement are social, and in particular,
parental. However, it is harder for government to
intervene to effect change here. -
- Though less of a driver of the social class
attainment gap than social factors and individual
characteristics, the evidence of the positive
impact of educational interventions is more
tangible.
Tackling social factors is critical, but they are
harder to affect
Educational interventions can be effective, even
though their potential impact is smaller
13What do we know about social class attainment
gaps? What drives the attainment gap?What
impact has policy had, and what are the lessons
for policy making?
14Summary Early years
- Pre-school attendance has a positive effect on
attainment in primary school, - Access to childcare provision supports parental
employment, which is likely to lead to better
child outcomes - Lessons for policy making
- take-up is lower among children from lower SEGs
- we need a better understanding of any quality
gap and its impact on child development - Evidence from the Sure Start evaluation points to
ensuring interventions reach the most
disadvantaged - Need to sustain impact through school for early
investment to have lasting consequences
15Summary family policy
- limited evidence on the effectiveness of
interventions to improve parenting skills, - those programmes which have an impact are often
highly targeted, specialised and costly
Specific interventions to improve parenting skills
- Young people who live in single-parent/carer
households or workless households often have
lower attainment levels - Increasing employment rates should raise family
income, and permanent income does appear to
matter for child development. - The Department can support employment through
access to childcare and through improving adult
skill levels
Improving family circumstances
16Summary School age
- Risks that the present floor target regime on its
own doesnt sufficiently focus effort on the
lowest attaining pupils, or on children with
potential to achieve very highly - Intervention in failing schools has
disproportionately benefited deprived pupils - Funding is distributed at national level to
recognise deprivation but this is often not
reflected in Local Authorities allocation - Increased funding can drive higher attainment
among low SEG pupils, especially if linked with
particular teaching and learning strategies - Use of personalised interventions such as
catch-up literacy and small group tuition can
help FSM children - Extended Schools have considerable potential
but need to ensure access - Not just for low-attaining deprived pupils
deprived pupils at risk of slower progress at all
levels of attainment - Education Bill ensures pupils from deprived
backgrounds are not disadvantaged in admissions,
and are supported in making choices about
schools.
School System
Funding
Curriculum, Teaching and Support
Choice and Access
17Summary 14-19
14-19 Qualifications and Curriculum Reforms have
Two Broad Objectives
- Breaking the cycle of student disengagement
- Participation lower among low SEG groups
- Raising attainment
- Ensuring that all students reach Level 2 by age
19a new ambition for 85 of all young people to
achieve this by 2013, rising to 90 thereafter
18Summary 19
- HE - while prior attainment is the key
determinant of access to Higher Education,
aspirations and expectations still play a
critical role. - Raising the skill levels of adults with few or no
qualifications has potential intergenerational
benefits, but making significant inroads into the
stock is a big challenge, - And evidence from the National Employer Training
pilots suggested a need for targeting of
employers who do not already provide time off
for low skilled employees to train to
qualifications to extend reach and impact
19Six general lessons underpin our approach to
narrowing the social class attainment gap
1. Higher Profile
2. Better Measurement
3. Early and sustained high quality interventions
4. Personalised Interventions
5. Improved understanding of key groups
6. Sharing Best Practice
20Key conclusions
- We are seeking to achieve an education system
characterised by excellence and equity - The evidence suggests that we need to think hard
about accountabilities and incentives in the
education system - Key areas include
- A continued focus on raising attainment for all
in the early years - A target to increase the number of children at
age 5 who achieve a good level of development
from 48 to 53 by 2008 - Incentives to encourage progression for all
students at all key stages, and possibly a target
to this effect - Ensuring that nearly all students reach Level 2
by age 19 - A new ambition for 85 of all young people to
achieve this by 2013, rising to 90 thereafter
21Social Mobility Narrowing Social Class
Attainment GapsA summary of the evidence and
lessons for policy making
- Stephen Meek
- Director of Strategy, DfES
- 26 April 2006