Lessons learned from the TAP learning agenda: preliminary results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Lessons learned from the TAP learning agenda: preliminary results

Description:

TAP Learning Agenda : a reminder. Preliminary results from health facility survey in Burkina Faso ... To give a flavor of possible analyses. Type of facilities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: olaet
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lessons learned from the TAP learning agenda: preliminary results


1
Lessons learned from the TAP learning agenda
preliminary results
  • Damien de Walque Harounan Kazianga (The World
    Bank)
  • Laeticia Nikiema (IRSS, Burkina Faso)

2
Overview
  • TAP Learning Agenda a reminder
  • Preliminary results from health facility survey
    in Burkina Faso
  • To give a flavor of possible analyses
  • Type of facilities offering ARV treatment
  • Type of services offered
  • Quality of service delivery, satisfaction, costs
    and waiting time
  • What next?

3
Question I Measuring the impact of treatment on
the welfare of patients and family members
  • Lives saved and health outcomes
  • Labor supply of patient and family members
  • Schooling of children
  • Other welfare indicators

4
Other questions
  • 2) Possible effects of ART on HIV transmission
    and prevention
  • 3) Determinants of adherence to treatment
  • 4) How to avoid the development and spread of
    resistance?
  • 5) How are ART beneficiaries identified? How to
    encourage timely uptake?
  • 6) How to assure the quality of HIV/AIDS service
    delivery?
  • 7) How to encourage capacity building to
    reinforce the sustainability of ART delivery?

5
Data collection (Longitudinally)
  • Biomedical follow-up
  • Health facility and association surveys
  • Household surveys (HIV patients and general
    population)
  • Surveys of employers and employees (Ghana)

6

Framework for Learning agenda
7
Health facility survey in Burkina Faso
  • Work done in partnership with the Institut de
    Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS) in
    Burkina Faso.
  • Data collected in summer of 2006.
  • Analysis is under way.
  • We are presenting some preliminary descriptive
    results.
  • Results will be analyzed jointly with household
    survey of patients (currently collected)

8
Sample
Only 37 of these health facilities offered ART
9
Brief Description of the Health Facilities
  • Distribution of staff by gender

10
Brief Presentation of the Health Facilities
  • Staff by function and type of health facility

11
Health Facilities and HIV
  • Voluntary testing37 Health facilities offered
    voluntary counseling and testing
  • Most frequently reasons cited for seeking
    counseling and testing
  • Voluntary 73
  • Tests required by other health facilities in case
    of sickness (referral) 21.6
  • Pregnancy 5.4

12
PMTCT activitiesTesting of children born to
seropositive women.
13
PMTCT TESTING AND HIV PREVALENCE
14
  • ARV prescription for PMTCT

Nevirapine seule Zidovidine seule ZidovidineLami
vudine
15
Results from patients exit interview
  • Patients randomly selected on the day of the
    visit to the facility
  • Patients on ARV
  • And patients coming for other type of health
    problems

16
Results from patients exit interviewage and
gender distribution
17
Distribution by type of facility
18
Access to health services costs
  • Expenses per visit excluding transportation costs

19
Access to health services costs
20
Access to health services waiting time
  • Waiting time at health facilities

21
Access to health services waiting time
  • HIV related and non-HIV visits

22
Access to health services waiting time
  • HIV related visits by type of health facility

23
SERVICE QUALITY AS MEASURED FROM PROVIDER
VIGNETTESMAXIMUM SCORE IS 20
24
Users satisfaction
  • Very satisfied 3. Not satisfied
  • Satisfied 4. Dont know

25
Satisfaction levels vary by gender and by type of
facility
26
Next steps
  • Merge with household survey data (currently
    collected)
  • Will allow much richer analysis.
  • Study impact on adherence, treatment outcomes of
  • Impact of out-of-pocket expenses and
    transportation costs.
  • Type of facility and service quality and
    patients satisfaction
  • Other socio-economic variables

27
TAP Learning Agenda Time table
  • Baseline surveys (household facility surveys)
  • - Burkina Faso - health facility collected
  • - household collection ongoing
  • - Ghana Data collection scheduled to start in
    February.
  • - Mozambique Data collection scheduled to
    start in May-June.
  • Follow-up surveys within 6-12 months after
    baseline.
  • Also analysis of general population surveys on
    link between treatment and prevention (Ghana,
    Burkina Faso).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com