Evaluating Claims - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating Claims

Description:

It must be possible to conceive of evidence that would prove the claim false ... Example If you were abducted by a UFO, how would you prove it? Summary of 'FiLCHeRs' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: dougste
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating Claims


1
Evaluating Claims
2
Scientific Reasoning
  • What are the tools of scientific reasoning?
  • FiLCHeRs six tools for distinguishing science
    from pseudoscience

3
1 - Falsifiability
  • It must be possible to conceive of evidence that
    would prove the claim false
  • Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking
    does 1 sound like?

4
  • Examples of falsifiability
  • Online Learning Module
  • http//www.psych.ualberta.ca/ITL/ct/
  • More links - http//web.bsu.edu/dlb/t/science/sciq
    uest/sciquest.htm

5
2 - Logic
  • Any argument offered as evidence in support of
    any claim must be sound.
  • Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking
    does 2 sound like?
  • Example - Turkish admiral Piri Re'is map of the
    world

6
3 - Comprehensiveness
  • The evidence offered in support of any claim must
    be exhaustive -- that is all of the available
    evidence must be considered.
  • Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking
    does 3 sound like?
  • Example Psychics and their predictions

7
4 - Honesty
  • The evidence offered in support of any claim must
    be evaluated without self-deception.
  • Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking
    does 4 sound like?

8
  • Example of Honesty (no self-deception)

9
5 - Replicability
  • It is necessary for the evidence to be repeated
    in subsequent experiments or trials.
  • Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking
    does 5 sound like?
  • Example - ESP

10
6 - Sufficiency
  • The evidence offered in support of any claim must
    be adequate to establish the truth of that claim
  • Which of the 7 Guidelines for Critical Thinking
    does 6 sound like?
  • Example If you were abducted by a UFO, how
    would you prove it?

11
Summary of FiLCHeRs
  • The first three rules of FiLCHeRS
  • -- falsifiability, logic, and
    comprehensiveness -- are all logically
    necessary rules of evidential reasoning.
  • The last three rules of FiLCHeRS
    -- honesty, replicability, and
    sufficiency -- are all pragmatically
    necessary rules of evidential reasoning.

12
Professional Skeptics
  • James Randi
  • Video of James Randi in Australia testing water
    diviners and dowsers
  • http//video.google.com/videoplay?docid7461912885
    649996034
  • - How does James Randi exemplify the
    7 Guidelines for Critical
    Thinking?
  • - How does water divining exemplify the
    10 Characteristics of
    Pseudoscience
  • - How does James Randis test of water divining
    exemplify 6 Tools of Scientific Reasoning?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com