Evaluating performance of flag States of fishing vessels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating performance of flag States of fishing vessels

Description:

... 17 are probably now custom: join, co-operate (abide by measures) or don't fish ... So States wanting to abide by rules have interest in having others do likewise ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: andrew501
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating performance of flag States of fishing vessels


1
Evaluating performance of flag States of fishing
vessels
  • Andrew SerdySchool of Law, University of
    Southampton
  • and OceanLaw

2
Why flag State responsibility is important (1)
  • High seas as commons everyone's catch affects
    everyone elses
  • UNCLOS Art 92 gives flag State exclusive
    jurisdiction over vessels on high seas, so each
    State is responsible for own compliance with
    obligations
  • Coupled with residual freedom of fishing in Art
    116, difficult to exclude free riders

3
Why flag State responsibility is important (2)
  • Customary international law obligation to
    cooperate is not enough no mechanism in UNCLOS
    to implement it
  • Unregulated fishing is disincentive to joint
    restraint (game theory)
  • Accountability mechanisms needed for catch,
    effort and other obligations

4
Why flag State responsibility is important (3)
  • No general obligation to join RFMOs, but UN Fish
    Stocks Agreement (UNFSA) Arts 8 and 17 are
    probably now custom join, co-operate (abide by
    measures) or dont fish
  • Even then, enforcement is still a problem
  • So States wanting to abide by rules have interest
    in having others do likewise
  • Hence stress on flag State responsibility

5
Criteria for assessing flag State performance
  • 3 broad categories
  • Party to relevant treaties
  • Participation in FAO and RFMOs
  • Domestic actions

6
Category A relevant treaties
  • UNCLOS largely custom, so mainly for compulsory
    dispute settlement mechanism
  • UNFSA wide-ranging rules including flag State
    duties
  • FAO Compliance Agreement for discrete high seas
    stocks not covered by UNFSA
  • Any treaty establishing a relevant RFMO (now
    central to fisheries world under UNFSA)

7
Category B participation in international
organisations
  • Membership of, or cooperation with, relevant
    RFMOs
  • Attending meetings of FAO COFI RFMOs
  • Domestic implementation of RFMO measures
    monitoring control and surveillance and
    enforcement

8
Category C domestic actions
  • National Plan of Action against IUU fishing
  • Effective compliance mechanisms UNFSA Art 19
  • Regulating on vessels on the high seas by
    prohibition on fishing without positive
    authorisation
  • Monitoring and enforcement UNFSA Art 18(3)(e) to
    (g)
  • National register of fishing vessels available to
    FAO and RFMOs
  • Standardised marking of fishing vessels
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com