Memory Mechanisms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Memory Mechanisms

Description:

Hartshorn, Aaron, Livolsi, Hille, & Rovee-Collier (1995) develop a reinforcement ... with a story about a girl who got a stomach-ache after eating eggs at breakfast ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: psych4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Memory Mechanisms


1
Memory Mechanisms
  • Information from the world enters and flows
    through a number of cognitive processes before
    ending as a response to the world

2
Long-Term Memory
  • Mobile Conjugate Reinforcement Paradigm
  • Operant conditioning
  • Procedure
  • Nonreinforcement (baseline)

3
Long-Term Memory
  • Mobile Conjugate Reinforcement Paradigm
  • Operant conditioning
  • Procedure
  • Nonreinforcement (baseline)
  • Reinforcement (learning)
  • Test (after a delay)

4
Long-Term Memory
  • Mobile Conjugate Reinforcement Paradigm
  • Operant conditioning
  • Procedure
  • Nonreinforcement (baseline)
  • Reinforcement (learning)
  • Test (after a delay)

5
Long-Term Memory
6
Long-Term Memory Older Infants
  • The mobile paradigm only works up to 6 months
  • Infant turns over
  • Infant tries grabbing the mobile
  • Infant longer finds the mobile game interesting

7
Long-Term MemoryOlder Infants
  • Hartshorn, Aaron, Livolsi, Hille, Rovee-Collier
    (1995) develop a reinforcement paradigm with a
    train and test every 3 months from 6 to 18 months
    of age

8
Determinants of Retention Training
  • Does more training lead to better retention?
  • Ohr, Fagen, Rovee-Collier, Hayne, Linde (1987)
    examined the effect of training on the retention
    of 3-month-olds
  • Trained infants for 1, 2, or 3 sessions of 9
    minutes each
  • Trained infants for a single session for 6, 9,
    12, or 18 minutes

9
Number of Sessions
  • After 1 session, remember for 1 day but not 7
  • After 2 sessions, remember for 7 days but not 14
  • After 3 sessions, remember for 7 days and perhaps
    14, but not 21

10
Training Duration
  • After 6 and 9 minutes, did not remember after 7
  • After 12 minutes, may exhibit retention after 7
    days, but not 14
  • After 18 minutes, remember for 14 days but not 21

11
Determinants of Retention Attention
  • Adler Rovee-Collier (1994) showed that infants
    remembered s for 7 days, but Ls and Ts for only
    3 days
  • Hypothesized this was due to more attention being
    allocated to s because they contain more features

12
Determinants of Retention Attention
  • Adler et al (1998) examined the effect of
    attention by training infants with a pop-out
    display
  • Single among Ls or single L among s
  • If retention is affected by attention, then the
    pop-out target should be remembered longer
  • Found that with among Ls, s remembered for 9
    days, Ls remembered for 1
  • With L among s, Ls remembered for 7 days, s
    remembered for 3 days

Test
Test L
13
Long-Term MemoryForgotten or Not
  • Are memories truly forgotten or are they simply
    inaccessible?
  • Infantile Amnesia
  • Provide a reminder at a point in time when the
    memory is supposedly forgotten

14
Long-Term MemoryForgotten or Not
  • At 3 months, takes 3 days after reminder for
    memory to come back fully
  • At 6 months, it takes 8 hours
  • At 9 months, it takes 1 hour
  • At 12 months, instantaneously

15
Long-Term MemoryForgotten or Not
  • At 3 months, takes 3 days after reminder for
    memory to come back fully
  • At 6 months, it takes 4 hours
  • At 9 months, it takes 1 hour
  • At 12 months, instantaneously

16
Types of Memory
  • Declarative (I.e. Episodic Explicit)
  • Memory for specific events
  • Procedural (I.e. Semantic Implicit)
  • Memory for how to do things General knowledge

17
Infants LTM
  • Memory tapped by the mobile game has been
    hypothesized to be procedural memory
  • Infants are remembering how to kick to the
    presented mobile
  • If this is the case, then infants, as long as
    they remember, should kick to any mobile

18
LTM Specificity
  • Examine whether infants remember the specific
    mobile with which they learned
  • If so, then memory cannot be procedural
  • Rovee-Collier Sullivan (1980) trained 3-mo-olds
    with one mobile and tested them, after different
    delays, with either same or a different mobile

19
Rovee-Collier Sullivan (1980)
20
Memory Specificity
  • Rovee-Collier Sullivan (1980) results indicate
    that very young infants memory is very specific
  • Though they remember general information longer
    than specific information
  • Not compatible with a procedural memory view
  • Hayne, Rovee-Collier, Borza (1991) examined
    infants memory for place information

21
Hayne, Rovee-Collier, Borza (1991)
22
Memory Summary
  • What seems to develop is the quantitative aspects
    of memory, not the qualitative aspects
  • That is, with development, events are remembered
    across longer delays and are retrieved at a
    faster rate

23
Constructive Memory
  • Use of knowledge structures and previously
    remembered events to interpret new information,
    thereby affecting how it is remembered
  • Eyewitness Testimony
  • Witness an event, then asked leading, suggestive
    questions

24
Suggestibility of Childrens Memory
  • Ceci, Ross, Toglia (1987)
  • Presented children with a story about a girl who
    got a stomach-ache after eating eggs at breakfast
  • Two conditions Biased and unbiased

25
Memory Modification
  • Happens in adults eyewitness testimony
  • Is this a basic mechanism of memory?
  • Infant mobile studies - after training, passively
    expose infants to novel mobile

26
Memory Modification
  • Memory is not completely accurate and can be
    modified
  • Infant childhood memories are not accurate but
    have been constructed
  • May be cause of infantile amnesia
  • Adler (1997) - Selective Integration

27
Types of Memory
  • It has been hypothesized that the different
    memory systems develop at different rates
  • Based on dissociations on particular tasks
    (priming vs. recognition-recall) in aging and
    amnesiacs
  • The memory system (implicit) spared in amnesiacs
    is primitive and functional in early development
  • The memory system (explicit) that is impaired in
    amnesiacs is a higher level and functional late
    in the first year

28
Types of Memory
  • Research with infants has in fact shown the same
    dissociations in infants as are found in normal
    adults
  • Thereby disputing that the different systems have
    different developmental trajectories
  • Two tests Direct test of memory
    (recognition-recall) and indirect test (priming)
  • Recognition-recall is thought to access explicit
    memory priming thought to access implicit memory
  • If a variable effects performance on one of the
    tasks but not the other, then have dissociation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com