Next Generation Army Electronic Warfare EW Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Next Generation Army Electronic Warfare EW Systems

Description:

Next Generation EW System Vision. Multifunctional, Reprogrammable, Reconfigurable, Integrated, Highly ... Open allows anyone to develop capabilities and add-ons ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:4548
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: EPOTEN
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Next Generation Army Electronic Warfare EW Systems


1
Next Generation Army Electronic Warfare (EW)
Systems
Distribution A For Public Release
2
THE OVERALL CLASSIFICATION OF THIS BRIEFING IS
UNCLASSIFIED
3
Next Generation EW System Vision
  • Multifunctional, Reprogrammable, Reconfigurable,
    Integrated, Highly Adaptive
  • Address all classes of threats with one common
    platform
  • Provide feedback on effectiveness to operator
    Battle Damage Assessment (BDA)
  • Low-RF signature minimize probability of
    detection
  • Small footprint minimize number of operators,
    antennas, and the size, weight, and prime power
    requirements of the hardware platform
  • Ability to rapidly upgrade software and add
    hardware to handle new threats
  • Minimize electronic fratricide

4
Granularity
Disrupt based on identity or characteristic
ONE
  • Disrupting ONE, MANY, or ALL threat
    communications may require
  • Threat survey capability
  • Direction Finding and/or geolocation capability
  • Exploitation of threat communications protocol
    layers
  • Intelligence from other sources
  • Reactive and active capabilities

ID
MANY
Disrupt based on geographic region, comms
network, class of threat, etc.
Disrupt all RF communications within Radio Line
of Sight (RLoS)
ALL
RLOS
5
Scalability and Configurability
  • Scalability
  • Seamless addition of hardware as threat quantity,
    variety, and operating frequency increase
  • Seamless addition of platforms when an individual
    platform cannot handle the load
  • Automatic synchronization of platforms for
    cooperative attacks by dividing threats among
    platforms or attacking a single threat from
    multiple platforms
  • Leverage multiple platforms for geolocation
  • Leverage EW system hardware for inter-platform
    communication
  • Configurability
  • Only those components required for the
    application need to be purchased and deployed
  • Common Graphical User Interface (GUI) regardless
    of configuration

6
Next Generation Integration
Rapid Integration of New Techniques
New Threat
Characterize Threat and Develop Techniques
Integrate with EW System
Assess Performance
  • Minimize transmit time and power
  • Simulation
  • Laboratory testing
  • Outdoor testing
  • Software architecture framework
  • Leverage integrated COTS components and products
  • Adaptive resource management

with representative real-world threat
environment
7
Achieving the Vision
  • Applying techniques that minimize transmit time
    and power go a long way to achieving many of the
    Next Generation Army EW system objectives
  • Facilitates addressing multiple threats and
    threat classes within the same hardware platform
  • Lowers RF signature making the system more
    difficult to detect and geolocate
  • Reduces RF power required to defeat threat thus
    reducing size, weight, and prime power
    requirements
  • Increases time available to conduct real-time BDA
  • Reduces impact of Next Generation EW System on
    Blue Force Communications

8
Minimize Transmit Power and Time
  • Leverage ES to determine potential threat
    frequencies prior to mission and update during
    mission
  • Use reactive versus active techniques
  • Exploit physical layer structure and higher layer
    protocols to disrupt communications with minimal
    transmission time
  • Attack just enough of the information content to
    disrupt communications
  • Disrupt critical components and structures of
    physical layer
  • Leverage threat communications protocol layers

9
Software Framework
  • Open, layered, service-oriented architecture
  • Open allows anyone to develop capabilities and
    add-ons
  • Layering supports rapid insertion of new Digital
    Signal Processing (DSP) / Digital Signal
    Generating (DSG) platforms
  • Service-orientation facilitates modification of
    some components without impacting others
  • Component-based integration framework
  • Addition of capabilities achieved via
    specialization of existing components (behavior
    and interfaces)
  • Software development is at a higher level than
    Application Programming Interface (API) /
    Software Development Kit (SDK)

Minimize HW dependent code
Source Network Electronic Warfare Army
Technology Objective (ATO)
10
Hardware Framework
Card-Level Devices
  • Anyone can develop hardware for the platform
  • Components can easily be changed based on
    changing threat or even mission

FPGA ADC
FPGA ADC
FPGA ADC
ICD/Interface
ICD/Interface
ICD/Interface
Power Amplifiers
Controller/GUI
ICD/Interface
Antennas
11
Scheduling
Mission Plan
Threat Type 1
  • Challenges
  • Multi-threat type / multi-mode / multi-band /
    multi-focus
  • Dynamic and adaptive resource utilization
  • Distributed resources
  • Short implementation time scale
  • Needs
  • Resource discovery
  • Resource monitoring / measurement
  • Resource partitioning
  • Task scheduling

Threat Type 2
Threat Type N
Scheduling
Environment
Source Network Electronic Warfare Army
Technology Objective (ATO)
12
Performance Assessment
  • Testing Next Generation Army EW Systems will be
    significantly more complicated than testing
    todays systems
  • Diverse test environments with a sufficient
    quantity and variety of threat devices that
    dynamically adapt to jamming are required to
    fully exercise next generation systems
  • A sufficient number of scenarios need to be
    tested to ensure all Next Generation EW System
    modes of operation are examined
  • Scalability and configurability are especially
    challenging to test because of the limitation on
    the number of scenarios that can be examined
  • Blue force communication systems need to be part
    of the test environment to verify compatibility
    under all modes of operation

13
Summary / Conclusions
  • Must get away from Boxology Cant afford a
    new box for every threat
  • Future EW systems will need a new paradigm
  • Techniques that minimize transmit time and power
  • Software framework that is adaptable to new
    technologies, techniques and evolving COTS
    hardware
  • Dynamic scheduling to maximize use of hardware
    and deal with target rich and diverse
    environments
  • Open platform specifications and tools are key
  • Leverage SDR model
  • Enable multiple vendors to implement techniques,
    software and hardware
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com