Title: Next Generation Army Electronic Warfare EW Systems
1Next Generation Army Electronic Warfare (EW)
Systems
Distribution A For Public Release
2THE OVERALL CLASSIFICATION OF THIS BRIEFING IS
UNCLASSIFIED
3Next Generation EW System Vision
- Multifunctional, Reprogrammable, Reconfigurable,
Integrated, Highly Adaptive - Address all classes of threats with one common
platform - Provide feedback on effectiveness to operator
Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) - Low-RF signature minimize probability of
detection - Small footprint minimize number of operators,
antennas, and the size, weight, and prime power
requirements of the hardware platform - Ability to rapidly upgrade software and add
hardware to handle new threats - Minimize electronic fratricide
4Granularity
Disrupt based on identity or characteristic
ONE
- Disrupting ONE, MANY, or ALL threat
communications may require - Threat survey capability
- Direction Finding and/or geolocation capability
- Exploitation of threat communications protocol
layers - Intelligence from other sources
- Reactive and active capabilities
ID
MANY
Disrupt based on geographic region, comms
network, class of threat, etc.
Disrupt all RF communications within Radio Line
of Sight (RLoS)
ALL
RLOS
5Scalability and Configurability
- Scalability
- Seamless addition of hardware as threat quantity,
variety, and operating frequency increase - Seamless addition of platforms when an individual
platform cannot handle the load - Automatic synchronization of platforms for
cooperative attacks by dividing threats among
platforms or attacking a single threat from
multiple platforms - Leverage multiple platforms for geolocation
- Leverage EW system hardware for inter-platform
communication - Configurability
- Only those components required for the
application need to be purchased and deployed - Common Graphical User Interface (GUI) regardless
of configuration
6Next Generation Integration
Rapid Integration of New Techniques
New Threat
Characterize Threat and Develop Techniques
Integrate with EW System
Assess Performance
- Minimize transmit time and power
- Simulation
- Laboratory testing
- Outdoor testing
- Software architecture framework
- Leverage integrated COTS components and products
- Adaptive resource management
with representative real-world threat
environment
7Achieving the Vision
- Applying techniques that minimize transmit time
and power go a long way to achieving many of the
Next Generation Army EW system objectives - Facilitates addressing multiple threats and
threat classes within the same hardware platform - Lowers RF signature making the system more
difficult to detect and geolocate - Reduces RF power required to defeat threat thus
reducing size, weight, and prime power
requirements - Increases time available to conduct real-time BDA
- Reduces impact of Next Generation EW System on
Blue Force Communications
8 Minimize Transmit Power and Time
- Leverage ES to determine potential threat
frequencies prior to mission and update during
mission - Use reactive versus active techniques
- Exploit physical layer structure and higher layer
protocols to disrupt communications with minimal
transmission time - Attack just enough of the information content to
disrupt communications - Disrupt critical components and structures of
physical layer - Leverage threat communications protocol layers
9Software Framework
- Open, layered, service-oriented architecture
- Open allows anyone to develop capabilities and
add-ons - Layering supports rapid insertion of new Digital
Signal Processing (DSP) / Digital Signal
Generating (DSG) platforms - Service-orientation facilitates modification of
some components without impacting others - Component-based integration framework
- Addition of capabilities achieved via
specialization of existing components (behavior
and interfaces) - Software development is at a higher level than
Application Programming Interface (API) /
Software Development Kit (SDK)
Minimize HW dependent code
Source Network Electronic Warfare Army
Technology Objective (ATO)
10Hardware Framework
Card-Level Devices
- Anyone can develop hardware for the platform
- Components can easily be changed based on
changing threat or even mission
FPGA ADC
FPGA ADC
FPGA ADC
ICD/Interface
ICD/Interface
ICD/Interface
Power Amplifiers
Controller/GUI
ICD/Interface
Antennas
11Scheduling
Mission Plan
Threat Type 1
- Challenges
- Multi-threat type / multi-mode / multi-band /
multi-focus - Dynamic and adaptive resource utilization
- Distributed resources
- Short implementation time scale
- Needs
- Resource discovery
- Resource monitoring / measurement
- Resource partitioning
- Task scheduling
Threat Type 2
Threat Type N
Scheduling
Environment
Source Network Electronic Warfare Army
Technology Objective (ATO)
12Performance Assessment
- Testing Next Generation Army EW Systems will be
significantly more complicated than testing
todays systems - Diverse test environments with a sufficient
quantity and variety of threat devices that
dynamically adapt to jamming are required to
fully exercise next generation systems - A sufficient number of scenarios need to be
tested to ensure all Next Generation EW System
modes of operation are examined - Scalability and configurability are especially
challenging to test because of the limitation on
the number of scenarios that can be examined - Blue force communication systems need to be part
of the test environment to verify compatibility
under all modes of operation
13Summary / Conclusions
- Must get away from Boxology Cant afford a
new box for every threat - Future EW systems will need a new paradigm
- Techniques that minimize transmit time and power
- Software framework that is adaptable to new
technologies, techniques and evolving COTS
hardware - Dynamic scheduling to maximize use of hardware
and deal with target rich and diverse
environments - Open platform specifications and tools are key
- Leverage SDR model
- Enable multiple vendors to implement techniques,
software and hardware