Ingress Filtering, Site Multihoming, and Source Address Selection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Ingress Filtering, Site Multihoming, and Source Address Selection

Description:

Site prefix from each ISP. ISPs perform source-address-based ingress filtering ... if hosts remember which router advertised the prefix used to generate each address. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:215
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: richard495
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ingress Filtering, Site Multihoming, and Source Address Selection


1
Ingress Filtering, Site Multihoming,and Source
Address Selection
draft-draves-ipngwg-ingress-filtering-00
  • Richard DravesMay 31, 2001
  • Redmond Interim IPv6 WG Meeting

2
The Problem
  • Multi-homed site
  • Site prefix from each ISP
  • ISPs perform source-address-based ingress
    filtering
  • Routing within site is based on destination
    address egress is independent of source
    address.
  • gt No connectivity to some destinations.

3
Possible Solutions
  • Tunneling between egress routers
  • Simplify sites with one link
  • Prefix policy configuration
  • New ICMP error

4
Tunneling between Egress Routers
  • Site egress routers inspect the source address
  • Tunnel packets to other egress router
  • Pro No changes in hosts
  • Con inefficient routing
  • Con requires router configuration

5
Sites with One Link
  • Suppose site has one link with multiple ISP
    routers,
  • Each ISP router advertises only its own prefix,
  • Then router choice could influence source address
    selection if hosts remember which router
    advertised the prefix used to generate each
    address.

6
Discussion
  • Pro fairly simple change to hosts
  • Con limited applicability
  • Can be generalized to site networks where each
    internal router only forwards towards one egress.

7
Prefix Policy Configuration
  • Use prefix policy table configuration to control
    choice of source address for different
    destination prefixes.
  • Pro uses existing mechanism.
  • Con need to understand how intrasite routing
    partitions destination space.
  • This partition likely not constant across time or
    site topology.
  • Con need to distribute policies to hosts.
  • In RAs?

8
New ICMP Error
  • Destination-unreachable due to source
    filter,supplies the required prefix.
  • Allow list of prefixes?
  • Host can associate this prefix with a destination
    address and use it to influence source address
    selection.
  • Analogous to PMTU discovery
  • Except first router should be most restrictive.

9
Issue TCP interaction
  • This doesnt help the first packet sent to a
    destination.
  • Must modify TCP to recognize this error in
    response to a SYN and redo source address
    selection.

10
Issue Routing the error
ISP A
dst Dsrc B1
Site
A1 B1
ISP B
  • If ISP A sends the error to B1, then it will take
    a circuitous route back to the host.

11
Error Routing Solutions
  • Force this particular ICMP error back out
    incoming interface?
  • Send the ICMP error using a routing header with
    an intermediate destination, which is an anycast
    address equal to the site prefix?
  • Assumptions
  • anycast address assigned to all routers in site
    using site prefix
  • convex routing within the site.

12
New ICMP Error w/ Routing Header
  • Pro like PMTU discovery, good robustness
  • Con like PMTU discovery, first packet is
    dropped
  • Con additional mechanism
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com