Guided Wave Radar Pros and Cons - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Guided Wave Radar Pros and Cons

Description:

Tanks with agitators or extreme turbulence should be approached with caution. If the agitator hits the probe it will cause a false signal. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:593
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: dave126
Category:
Tags: agitator | cons | guided | pros | radar | wave

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Guided Wave Radar Pros and Cons


1
Guided Wave RadarPros and Cons
  • By David Land, P.E.
  • ConocoPhillips
  • Field Instrumentation Network Lead

2
GWR Cons First
  • GWR is a contacting technology the probe is
    in the process fluid. If the fluid is
    particularly corrosive or there are material
    compatibility issues this can become a limiting
    factor. There are alternate metals available for
    probes and Teflon coating is an option, but with
    Teflon coating you run into Temperature issues.
  • The maximum process temperature for most units is
    around 750 F. Temperatures over this require a
    different technology.
  • GWR is unpredictable in foaming applications. In
    light foam the GWR will ignore the foam and
    reflect back the liquid level. In heavy foam, the
    signal can be absorbed and reflect back the top
    of the foam as level and/or weaken the overall
    signal.

3
GWR more Cons
  • Highly viscous fluids should be approached with
    caution. They tend to coat the probe. Single
    probes work well with coating, but heavy coating
    will weaken the signal. Dual probes and coax
    probes can strengthen the signal but can also
    bridge in coating service meaning the fluid
    will bridge across the two probes or inside the
    pipe of a coax and cause the signal to lock on
    the bridging as the level.
  • Tanks with agitators or extreme turbulence should
    be approached with caution. If the agitator hits
    the probe it will cause a false signal. Extreme
    turbulence can either break a rigid probe or
    cause a flex probe to hit against the nozzle,
    causing a false signal. A coax probe or bridle is
    a good solution for turbulence as long as the
    process media does not plate out or coat metals.
  • Interface applications where the product
    dielectrics are not at least 10 apart will not
    work with GWR, since GWR depends on a difference
    in dielectric to reflect back the interface
    level. Oil/Water is the ideal interface
    application water with a dielectric of 80,
    oil with a dielectric of approx. 2. They are
    much more that 10 apart.

4
GWR more Cons
  • Fiberglass or plastic tanks should be approached
    with caution. The GWR requires a solid ground for
    the microwave signal on the probe. We have
    successful installations on Fiberglass, but dual
    probes or a metal flange at least 2 OD for a
    mounting surface is recommended.
  • In interface applications, if the dielectric
    constant of the upper product varies there can be
    an error in the measurement. The dielectric of
    the upper product must be lower than the
    dielectric of the lower product to have an
    interface reflection. The upper product cannot
    have a dielectric greater than 10 for the
    single probe and 5 for a dual probe. Depending
    on the probe, the upper product must be at least
    4-8 for the radar to distinguish the echoes
    between the two fluids.
  • Emulsion layers between two liquids can cause
    some inaccuracies.
  • Longer probe lengths may require a crane to
    extract from the vessel.

5
GWR Pros
  • Direct level measurement
  • No moving parts
  • Handles changing density, dielectrics,
    conductivity, temperature, pressure, pH and
    viscosity
  • Handles small tanks, difficult tank geometry,
    interfering obstacles
  • Easy swap (small openings)
  • Virtually unaffected by dust, vapor and
    turbulence

6
GWR Pros
  • Solids, powders, granules
  • Level and Interface Level from one transmitter
  • Guided Wave Radar technology is virtually
    unaffected by probe coating
  • Recalibration not necessary
  • Recalibration cost dramatically reduced
  • Measurement availability improved

7
GWR Pros
  • Reducing CAPEX Cost
  • Low installation cost
  • Installation while tank is in service
  • Easy Commissioning
  • Pre-configured transmitters
  • No re-calibration required
  • User-friendly Configuration tools

8
GWR Pros
  • Reducing OPEX Cost
  • Increased Availability
  • No re-calibration
  • Entire tank range
  • Advanced Signal Processing
  • No moving parts less down-time
  • Increased Safety, Health Environment
  • Dual Compartment
  • Configuration adjustments without opening tank
  • One point entry on top of tank

9
GWR Pros
  • Reducing OPEX Cost
  • Reduced Operations Maintenance
  • No matching parts
  • No moving parts, less spare parts, less
    maintenance
  • Remove electronics while tank is in service
  • Easy troubleshooting
  • Higher Quality
  • Reliable, accurate level measurement
  • Virtually unaffected by process conditions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com