Title: Analysing cause of death trends: Impact of ICD10 implementation
1Analysing cause of death trends Impact of ICD-10
implementation
- Patricia Tully and Patricia Wood
- Statistics Canada
2Outline
- Description of the Canadian Vital Statistics
System - Underlying cause of death
- Features of ICD-10
- Impact of ICD-10 implementation on cause of death
statistics
3Canadian Vital Statistics System
- Provincial/territorial registration of death
- Federal/provincial/territorial agreement
- Data and registration document images to
Statistics Canada - Compilation of national database
4Underlying Cause of Death
- Defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) in
the Tenth Revision of the International
Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and earlier
revisions as - (a) the disease or injury which initiated the
train of events leading directly to death, or (b)
the circumstances of the accident or violence
which produced the fatal injury.
5History of mortality classification in Canada
6Medical Certificate of Cause of Death
7How is Underlying Cause of Death determined in
ICD-10?
- The General Principle
- When more than one condition is entered on the
certificate, select the condition entered alone
on the lowest used line of Part 1 only if it
could have given rise to all the conditions
entered above it. (ICD-10, Volume 2) - Selection Rules 1 to 3
- Modification Rules A to F
8Medical Certificate of Cause of Death
9Major category and code changes from ICD-9 to
ICD-10 Mortality
- Alphanumeric code structure (A00-Y89)
- Number and order of chapters
- Chapters I to XVIII (A00-R99) Diseases
- Chapter XIX (S00-T98) Injury, poisoning and
certain other consequences of external causes - Chapter XX (V01-Y89) External causes of morbidity
and mortality
10Major category and code changes from ICD-9 to
ICD-10 Mortality (continued)
- Number of codes valid for underlying cause of
death 8,000 in ICD-10 versus 5,000 in ICD-9 - ICD-9
- One code (438) for Late effects of
cerebrovascular disease - ICD-10
- Six codes (I69.0-I69.4, I69.8) for Sequelae of
cerebrovascular disease
11Evaluation of ICD-10 impact on Mortality
Statistics
- New categories new rules disrupted trends in
causes of death - How can the size of the impact be measured?
- Conduct a study to code 1999 deaths with both
ICD-9 and ICD-10 (bridge-coding study) - Calculate comparability ratios for selected
detailed causes of death
12How are comparability ratios calculated?
- For a selected cause of death,
13How are comparability ratios used?
- Comparability ratios can be used as factors for
adjusting cause-of-death-specific mortality
statistics. For example - A comparability ratio of 0.70 for a specific
cause or group of causes means that for every 100
deaths classified to that cause in ICD-9, there
would be 70 deaths classified by ICD-10 to the
comparable cause(s)
14Is there a conversion table?
- A conversion table lists a code from ICD-9 along
with all the codes in ICD-10 that qualitatively
correspond to one another - A conversion table is not a substitute for a
bridge-coding study - Bridge-coding yields comparability ratios that
measure the impact of changes to both codes and
selection rules
15Areas of greatest expected impact
- Significant discontinuities are expected in cause
of death trends from 1999 (the last year of
ICD-9) to 2000 (the first year of ICD-10).
16Areas of greatest expected impact (continued)
- Large decreases are expected in
- Pneumonia and influenza
- Accidental falls
- Vital hepatitis
- Tuberculosis
17Large decreases due to ICD-10 implementation
18Pneumonia and influenza
19Areas of greatest expected impact (continued)
- Large increases are expected in
- Alzheimers disease
- Septicaemia
- Non-malignant neoplasms
- Other and unspecified non-transport accidents and
their sequelae
20Large increases due to ICD-10 implementation
21Alzheimers disease
22Who to contact at Statistics Canada