Cronon: Ch. 7: A World of Fields and Fences. PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 21
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cronon: Ch. 7: A World of Fields and Fences.


1
Cronon Ch. 7 A World of Fields and Fences.
  • ISS 310
  • People and Environment
  • Prof. Alan Rudy
  • 1/31/02
  • 1. Main Points? What is he talking about? Why?

2
Fields and Fences
  • Nature, Society, Politics Economics
  • Then Nature -- Forestry
  • Now Social Nature -- Agriculture
  • Hmmm, am I imposing this on the text? is it there
    already?
  • Does it help to understand a book to impose order
    on it that may or may not have been what the
    author intended?

3
Maize
  • Both Indians and English grew corn.
  • What was different?
  • Spatially -- in communities and in fields
  • Temporally -- seasonally re use/property
  • year-round ownership rather than seasonal use

4
Mammals
  • Both consumed grazing animals.
  • What was different?
  • Spatially -- in communities and in fields/wild
  • Temporally -- seasonally, re use/property
  • year-round ownership rather than use after
    killing

5
Mammals, ag. and food
  • Greatest mammalian differentiation grazing
    mammals hunting wild deer and moose rather than
    growing cattle, oxen, horses, swine, sheep, and
    goats.

6
Mammals and Money
  • Most reliable source of income (with a minimum of
    labor) locally, salted to Europe, or shipped to
    Caribbean plantations.
  • Regular complaints of Indian theft of livestock
    but its not theft under usufruct.
  • This kind of property relies on FENCES
  • Cronon suggests that w/o livestock colonists
    might have been limited to Indian-scale
    ecological effects and usufruct based natural
    resource relations.

7
Fences, Commons and Mammals
  • However, grazing livestock in the commons meant
    that damage done by English livestock to unfenced
    Indian lands legally necessitated payment of
    damages!
  • FUNNY, but always on English legal terms (Indians
    had to capture marauding animals ALIVE and HOLD
    them
  • HOW? w/o fences?

8
Fences, Commons and Mammals II
  • The long run effect is that Indians were forced
    to develop fenced agriculture even when the
    English had to build the fences at first (though
    Indians then had to tend for them)
  • See sidewalks in the 20th C they put in the
    sidewalks but I have to keep them clear and
    repair them when the citys trees break the
    concrete.)

9
Three little piggies...
  • SWINE
  • Reproduced really fast, will eat virtually
    anything, can be turned out to the woods and fend
    for themselves.
  • Swine pops get so high, weed/pest animals, they
    could be killed if caught in fields (by English,
    not Indian, farmers.
  • Eventually, open season on feral pigs, repealed,
    recalled, round and round -- finally had to be
    stied.

10
and some wolves.
  • Wolves bounties (set a price for wild animals
    too little enforcement labor, difficult to figure
    out who pays, and whether anyone has paid
    before)
  • Wolves became a reason to drain and clearing
    swamps.
  • WHAT?!
  • Entire ecological communities were thus
    threatened because they represented an annoyance
    and prejudice to the town both by the miring of
    cattle and sheltering of wolves and vermin.
    (133)

11
Wolves and workers
  • Whereas most livestock in England had been
    watched over by individual herders, labor was
    scarce enough in New England that only the most
    valuable animals could generally be guarded.

12
Labor, Labor, Labor and the Law
  • Either fences had to be built and maintained
    (often w/ regulations about such things) or the
    agricultural damaged by semi-domesticated
    privately owned animals had to be dealt with
    AGAIN BECAUSE OF THE SHORTAGE OF LABOR.

13
LLL and the Law II
  • The regulations necessitated enforcement folks
    going around checking to make sure people kept
    their fences in good repair (large animals can of
    course damage them at will) so that lazy farmers
    with bad fences couldnt make illegitimate
    claims
  • Now, is this productive labor? Enforcement of
    fence viability to protect use of the commons by
    private individuals? Did the Indians have these
    issues?

14
Key Quote about agriculture, mammals, space and
property.
  • Through the agency of the fence viewers and the
    formal litigation of the courts, towns took an
    increasing responsibility not only for enforcing
    the abstract boundaries between adjacent tracts
    of real estate but for guaranteeing that those
    boundaries were marked by the physical presence
    of fences. (135)

15
More on quote
  • Private property generates abstract plots which
    have to be made real by legislative/juridical
    action and real boundary markers (whether fences
    or other ways)
  • THIS IS BECAUSE PRIVATE PROPERTY IS NOT
    REAL/NATURAL IT IS A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
    INDIVIDUALS, SOCIETY AND NATURE WHICH EXISTS IN
    SOME PLACES AND TIMES AND NOT IN OTHERS.
  • We make it real by acting as if it always has
    been so, but now you know it hasnt always been
    so.

16
More quotes
  • Fences thus marked off, not only the map of a
    settlements property rights, but its economic
    activities and economic relationships as well.
    At the center of a familys holdings was its
    house lot nearby were the outbuildings where
    animals spent their winters. Feeding animals in
    the winter necessitated reserving large tracts
    of land for mowing all other lands were
    committed to grazing, including upland woodlots
    where families cut their fuel and lumber.
    (137-138)

17
Another quote
  • Gender Early land divisions had been done
    communally Later divisions were generally made
    through the abstract mechanism of land
    speculation ignored both the ecological
    characteristics of a given tract of land and its
    intended agricultural...(138)

18
Animals, plows and weeds
  • Grazing facilitated the introduction of European
    grasses, weeds, woody thorn-bearing plants etc.
    -- adapted to the harsh requirements of
    grazing.
  • Weeds grow rapidly, germinate easily and attack
    both ag and wild lands -- changing the
    opportunity structure for indigenous plants
    making some of them pests.
  • And weve not even mentioned the plow, which tore
    up whole ecosystems, or over-extended use, soil
    depletion or erosion all tied to ag mammals and
    private property.

19
Soil Compaction
  • Soil compaction
  • harden,
  • reduce oxygen,
  • curtail root growth,
  • exacerbate toxic chemical production/residues,
  • reduce carrying capacity for moisture, and
  • increased erosion.

20
Soil Erosion
  • Erosion/watershed changes
  • filling in ponds and lakes,
  • changing top soil sedimentation rates during
    annual floods,
  • streams and small rivers dried up,
  • shipping lanes had to be dredged or warfs
    extended,
  • shoreline grasslands became shifting dunes, and
  • overgrazed small islands disappeared

21
Soil Exhaustion and Conclusion
  • Soil Exhaustion
  • maize monoculture w/o legumes,
  • cattle graze unharvested plant material,
  • abandoned maize fields grazed rather than
    fallowed, and
  • uncollected manure (tried fish ran out due to
    dams, ashes deplete forests for soil, oops.)
  • AGAIN, NATURE (SOILS, MAMMALS, PESTS, WATER) IS
    NOT AT FAULT -- ITS ALL ABOUT HOW WE ORGANIZE
    OUR SIDE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com