Pulse Analysis for ATLAS MDT Twin Tubes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Pulse Analysis for ATLAS MDT Twin Tubes

Description:

1200 Muon Chambers with Trigger Chambers (RPC's) 240-432 Monitored Drift ... Aluminium tube filled with gas (radius 15mm) Wire at positive high voltage (3200 V) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: ajko
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pulse Analysis for ATLAS MDT Twin Tubes


1
Pulse Analysis for ATLAS MDT Twin Tubes
  • Alex Koutsman
  • Supervisor dr. ir. Harry van der Graaf
  • 18-05-2005

2
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
  • Operational in 2007 at CERN
  • 14 TeV proton-collisions
  • 1148 TeV lead-nuclei collisions
  • Higgs search, B-physics
  • Physics beyond the Standard Model

3
ATLAS
  • 1) Inner Detector
  • 2) Calorimeters
  • 3) Muon Spectrometer
  • Muon path bent by the magnetic field
  • Amount of curvature momentum
  • Muon Spectrometer
  • 1200 Muon Chambers with Trigger Chambers (RPCs)
  • 240-432 Monitored Drift Tubes (MDT) per Chamber
  • In total 370 000 MDTs in ATLAS

4
Operation principle of a MDT
  • Aluminium tube filled with gas (radius 15mm)
  • Wire at positive high voltage (3200 V)
  • Ionisation by passing particle
  • Electron-clusters form and drift to the wire
  • Response Electronics (ASD)

5
MDT
  • Drift-time drift-radius
  • Target precision of a single MDT radius 80 µm
  • Measurement with the whole chamber new precision
    30 µm in the bending direction
  • Diffusion ? Focussing

6
Twin Tubes
  • Two tubes interconnected at the high voltage end
  • Read-Out on both ends
  • Difference in time gives position along the tube
  • Built-in delay in HV-jumper (6 ns)
  • Shaping by the wire
  • Amplitude loss
  • Leading edge slope less steep

Prompt or Twin Tube !!!
7
Why Twin Tubes?
  • PRO
  • 1) Measurement hit along the tube (non-bending
    direction)
  • 2) Simplification pattern recognition
  • 3) Resolving ambiguities from multiple tracks
    (essential)
  • CONTRA
  • 1) Higher occupancy of the MDTs (2x)

OUTER CHAMBERS
8
Cosmic Ray Stand
  • Twin-tube connectors installed
  • Scintillators for trigger
  • ATLAS Data acquisition
  • -Threshold crossing time
  • -Signal amplitude
  • -Trigger reference time

9
Experimental Setup
  • Trigger unit
  • Momentum cut muons 1 GeV
  • Three positions along the tube (x-axis)

Accepted angle!!!
10
Data Acquisition
muon
Negative Part of the Differential Signal
Ethernet
Digital Scope
Scintillators
Logical AND
TRIGGER
Logical AND
  • LabVIEW
  • Set Channel parameters
  • Set trigger parameters
  • Set time parameters
  • Set data recording parameters
  • ASCI ? ROOT-histograms (Active MDT events)

Logical OR
11
Good Twin Tubes Events
12
Drift-time spectrum
  • Top scintillator as reference time
  • Compare with threshold crossing time for MDTs
  • Prompt or Twin Tube!!!

13
Amplitude Spectrum
  • Integrate signal charge over 15.5 ns
  • Discriminate prompt and twin tube
  • Landau distribution

14
Noise Level
  • Noise spectrum first 400 ns
  • Mean distribution
  • Sigma distribution

15
Rt-relation
  • Drift-time to drift-radius
  • Homogenous irradiation
  • Integrate drift-time spectrum

16
Mean Signal vs Radius
  • Get drift-time borders from the Rt-relation
  • Add all signals in a radius-bin
  • Normalize with the number of events

Diffusion ? Focussing
17
Slope at Threshold vs Radius
  • Set fitting range at threshold crossing 3ns
  • Fit a line to measure the slope
  • Slope-distribution per Radius-bin

Prompt vs Twin Tube
18
Risetime vs Radius
  • Risetime Vmin/Slope
  • Find First Minimum (Vmin)
  • Slope calculation between 0.2Vmin and
  • 0.8Vmin

19
Smoothness Selection
  • First Minimum
  • Find First Minimum (FM) within 120ns after
    threshold crossing
  • Check for Minima OR Inflection Points (IP)
    between 0.9FM-Value and FM-Value

Around 35 dont make it through the
selection!!! More Low Amplitude events are
cut off!!!
  • Select
  • If FM or IP is between threshold crossing and
    0.9FM, then event is BAD!!!
  • Check for CLEAR Minima with Amplitude gt
    0.7FM-Value

20
Risetime vs Radius
21
Time Resolution
  • Fit a gauss to the time difference distribution
    resolution sigma (st)
  • Cosmic Ray Stand resolution 1 ns
  • Strong selection of events
  • Track fitting
  • Slewing correction
  • No secondary hits

22
Shadowing Particles
  • Leading edge of the muon signal is screened
  • Shadowing particles
  • d-electron (d-ray)
  • Photon
  • Shower particle
  • Clean up and select similar events

23
Smoothness Selection
24
Mean Range Selection
  • Get Minimum of Mean Signal
  • Deselect all events outside Vmin Vminmean
    CMRS

Varying the Vminmean resolution deteriorated
25
Vmin Ratio Selection
  • Ratio
  • Fit a gauss through the selected distribution
  • Deselect events with ratio outside CVminRS X
    sratio

26
Prompt Change Selection
  • Some strange events secondary particles
  • Check if the prompt changes
  • Use two thresholds for certainty

Cut off are 2-3 of events that get through the
other selections!!!
27
Charge Selection
  • Resolution highly dependent on amplitude
  • Deselect events if one channel amplitude is below
    the mean
  • Resolution improvement of 20

28
Time Resolution vs x
  • Tails especially big for events at the Read-Out
    end
  • Difference with Cosmic Ray Stand
  • 1) data
  • 2) spread in accepted angle

29
Time Mean vs x
  • Take mean for each x-position
  • Fit a line
  • 2Slope gives the signal speed in the tube
  • Extrapolating to maximum length of 4.9m gives the
    HV-jumper delay

30
Conclusions and Outlook
  • Twin Tube concept offers an adequate measurement
    of the hit position along the tube
  • The signals of the twin tubes are as expected
  • Drift-time spectrum
  • Amplitude spectrum
  • Low noise
  • Slope vs Radius
  • Risetime vs Radius
  • Time resolution
  • The ATLAS setup will reach better resolution, as
    on average a muon hits 6 tubes in a chamber
  • Slewing correction
  • Comparison to Cosmic Ray Stand data and to the
    simulation
  • Qualitative and quantitative

http//www.nikhef.nl/ajkoutsm/TwinTubes.ps
31
BACKUP SLIDES
32
Amplitude Ratio
  • The further the twin tube signal has to travel
    the further away the ratio goes away from unity

33
Slewing
RO-end
  • Time Difference vs Integrated Charge
  • Profile histogram
  • Slewing is the greatest for RO-end, as expected
  • Tails have a big influence on the distribution

Middle
HV-end
34
Electronics Scheme
  • MDTs read out before the discriminator stage
  • Trigger top AND bottom OR

35
3300 Volts
  • 3300V has more tails for all x-positions
  • Preliminary results are not better then 3200V
    (also with Selection)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com