ENSC 412612 Week 3 Engineering control of pollutants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

ENSC 412612 Week 3 Engineering control of pollutants

Description:

Cost of controlling a source is usually an exponential function of the ... sulfide, hydrogen chloride, chlorine, ammonia, oxides of nitrogen, and some HC. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: peter756
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ENSC 412612 Week 3 Engineering control of pollutants


1
ENSC 412/612 Week 3Engineering control of
pollutants
  • READINGS FOR THIS WEEK
  • Text CHAPTERS 28, 29, 30, 31
  • Millar (2007) paper

2
Concepts
  • Some sources are uncontrollable (e.g. volcano).
  • Cost of controlling a source is usually an
    exponential function of the percentage of control
  • important consideration in defining the level of
    control required.
  • This can change if material recovered has an
    economic value OH Fig 28-2 .

3
(No Transcript)
4
Control of pollutants
  • Designers must be aware of chemical and physical
    properties of effluent wrt changes in
    temperature, volume, moisture, velocity, as well
    as regulatory issues. Control can either be
    removal of pollutant, or conversion to a less
    polluting form.
  • Three general methods of control
  • process change to a less polluting process or a
    change in the existing process operation.
    pollution prevention'' is often the best and
    most economic solution.
  • fuel change - often used in episode management
    (eg switch to natural gas or low sulfur coal when
    stagnation conditions are likely). May be
    difficult since low polluting fuel in high demand
    and may be expensive, and supply hard to obtain.
  • installation of control equipment between the
    point of generation and the point of its emission
    into the atmosphere. Efficiency is expressed as a
    percentage of removal on a weight basis.

5
  • E 100(C/A) but since ABC
  • E 100(C/(BC)) 100(A-B)/A
  • 100(A- B)/ (BC)
  • (ignoring hold-up and loss)

6
  • If a pollutant is removed, it must be disposed
    of.
  • This can create other problems, especially if the
    pollutant is a toxic (now solid) waste.
  • To remove a pollutant from the carrying stream,
    some property of the pollutant that is different
    from the carrier must be exploited. (eg. size,
    inertia, electrical or absorption properties)

7
Devices and systems
  • Control device is specific for pollutant. eg
    control of aerosols different from gases dry
    aerosols different from liquid droplets.
  • There are a large number of characteristics which
    must be considered in designing control devices.
  • Once equipment is installed, operation and
    maintenance become important. Most regulations
    for new facilities require use of the Best
    Available Control Technology (BACT).

8
Control device characteristics
9
Removal of dry particulate matter
  • Dry aerosols differ so much from the carrying gas
    that their removal can be done in many different
    ways physically, inertially, chemically,
    electrically.

10
Filters
  • Particles impinges on and adheres to filter
    material, as deposit accumulates it also acts as
    a filtering material. When deposit becomes heavy
    it reduces the flow and must be cleaned or
    replaced. Filter material can be fibrous (eg
    cloth), granular (eg sand), rigid (eg a screen)
    or a mat (eg felt). Removal occurs by
  • direct impaction
  • inertial impaction (streamline misses filter by
    inertia of particle resists change in direction
    and adheres)
  • electrostatic attraction

11
(No Transcript)
12
  • Industrial baghouses are the most common form of
    industrial filtration.
  • Pollutant stream is passed through a series of
    bags.
  • Filter ratio is expressed as gas to cloth ratio
    (0.6 to 1.5 m3 of gas per minute per m2 fabric).
  • Sections of the bags are cleaned periodically by
    shaking, reverse air flow, etc.
  • Other methods include
  • passing gases through beds of sand or coke, mats
    (throw away filters),
  • paper filters,
  • rigid porous beds,
  • porous ceramics,
  • fluidized beds in which the granular material
    forced to act as a fluid by the gas passing
    through it.

13
Electrostatic precipitators
  • Widely used since start of century,
  • very efficient, but more expensive typically than
    filtration.
  • Works by charging dust with ions and then
    collecting charged particles on either a tubular
    or flat plate surface.
  • Plates are cleaned usually by rapping the surface
    after power is shut off.
  • A high voltage (30kV or more) DC field set up
    between a central wire electrode and the grounded
    collecting surface
  • cascade of negative ions in the gap bombards and
    charges the particles which then migrate to the
    collecting surface because of both the
    bombardment and the charge attraction.

14
Advantages
  • Can handle high temperature gases which are often
    a problem for filtration methods.
  • small pressure drop so fan costs are minimized
  • high collection efficiency if used on proper
    pollutants
  • handles a wide range of particle sizes and
    concentrations
  • operating and maintenance costs are lower than
    other types

15
Disadvantages
  • initial cost is the highest
  • take up lots of space
  • not suitable for combustible particles like grain
    or wood dust

16
Inertial collectors
  • Operate on principle that aerosol material in the
    carrying gas has a greater inertia than the gas.
  • Drag on a particle scales as r2 while inertia
    increases as r3 so that inertial collectors
    become more efficient for larger particles,
    especially those which are dense (since mass as
    well as velocity determine inertia).
  • Essential idea is that the stream is forced to
    change direction dramatically - the particles
    because of their inertia resist the change in
    direction, impact, and are removed from the gas
    stream.

17
(No Transcript)
18
  • Types include cyclones, baffles, louvers or
    rotating impellers. OH Fig 29-6 For a cyclone,
    the centrifugal force acting on a particle is
  • F mA m V2/R
  • so that the inertial impaction increases with
    mass and velocity, and decreases with radius of
    curvature.

19
Scrubbers
  • Wet collectors are commonly used.
  • First particles are wetted, either by bubbling
    the gas through a liquid, or by spraying the gas
    with an atomized liquid.
  • Next the particles are removed from the liquid on
    a collecting surface (on a bed, or using an
    inertial collector.
  • Efficiency increases with smaller bubbles or
    droplets since the surface area for contact is
    larger.
  • Dry scrubbers are gravel bed filters that are
    recirculated and washed.
  • Can remove large quantities, but stream may need
    further treatment.

20
(No Transcript)
21
Removal of liquid droplets
  • Similar to dry particles.
  • Filters need to be looser,
  • ESPs are usually wetted wall tube types
  • Inertial collectors are common and have similar
    efficiency as with dry collectors.
  • Scrubbers also work effectively (venturi
    scrubbers etc.).
  • One problem with venturi scrubbers is that
    cooling can condense some gases resulting in a
    plume with high opacity.

22
(No Transcript)
23
Removal of gaseous pollutants
  • If gases are reactive to other chemicals, this
    property can be used to remove them.
  • absorption in a liquid (wet scrubbers)
  • used for sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide,
    hydrogen chloride, chlorine, ammonia, oxides of
    nitrogen, and some HC.
  • Gas to be removed must be soluble in scrubbing
    liquid.
  • Water possibly enhanced with acid or base is most
    commonly used.
  • Gases recovered can have economic value when
    removed from the scrubbing solvent.
  • adsorption on a solid surface
  • gases may be selectively retained on surface of a
    solid,
  • can be a surface phenomenon or combined with a
    chemical reaction (chemisorption).
  • Porous materials used eg activated carbon,
    alumina, silica gel.
  • Materials must be capable of being regenerated
    and reused after saturation with gas molecules.
    Can have efficiencies near 100 until adsorber
    becomes saturated.

24
(No Transcript)
25
  • 3. condensation to a liquid condensers may be
    used first to remove condensible components.
    Accomplished either by reducing T or increasing P
    - usually T drop is used. In contact condensers
    the coolant, vapors and condensate are mixed, in
    surface condensers, coolant does not contact
    vapors or condensate.
  • 4. conversion to non-pollutant eg organic gases
    are oxidized by combustion. H2S SO2 and H2O
    even though SO2 is still considered a pollutant
    its odour threshold is 3 orders of magnitude
    higher than for H2S. Usually an open flare is
    used (eg Husky Oil), which may have a pilot or
    afterburner. Afterburners can be direct flame
    (oxidation in a combustion chamber above ignition
    T), or catalytic (oxidation below ignition T).

26
  • Reasons for condensing
  • Recovery of valuable products
  • Removal of corrosive or damaging components
  • Reduction of effluent gas volume

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Odour removal
  • Any objectionable odour above the detection
    threshold will cause complaints.
  • Control involves reduction to less than the odour
    threshold, or conversion to a substance that is
    not as odourous. Can be done by

30
  • dilution the solution to pollution is infinite
    dilution - tall stacks, or by adding air to the
    stream
  • removal change in process (eg replace
    formaldehyde based resin with another),
    adsorption, etc.
  • conversion eg oxidation of H2S

31
Control of stationary sources
  • Read text chapter 30, focus here on forest
    production and oil refining.
  • Major sources are open burning of forests, wood
    fired power boilers which burn waste materials.

32
(No Transcript)
33
  • For Kraft pulp mills, control is accomplished by
  • ESPs on the recovery furnace,
  • collection of noncondensible gases from vent
    points (digesters, blow tanks, washers) which are
    ducted to the lime kiln where they are burned,
    and
  • wet scrubbers on the lime kiln exhaust to remove
    PM and sulfurous gases

34
Control of mobile sources
  • Automobiles are the main source.
  • Since 1960's crankcase emissions have been
    controlled by PCVs which take gases from the
    crankcase through a control valve into the
    combustion chamber where they are burned.
  • evaporative emissions from the fuel tank
    controlled since the 1970s by either a vapour
    recovery system or an adsorption system using
    activated carbon canister.
  • exhaust emissions are hardest to control.
  • exhaust depends on fuel type, air-fuel ratio,
    ignition timing, compression, engine speed,
    engine condition, coolant temperature, etc.
  • focus is on elimination of unburned HC, CO and
    NOx.

35
(No Transcript)
36
  • Control of exhaust for unburned HC and CO
    involves
  • fuel modifications
  • minimizing pollutants from the combustion chamber
    - better engineering of motors
  • oxidation of pollutants outside the combustion
    chamber - either by normal combustion, or by
    catalytic oxidation. Requires pumping of air to
    the exhaust stream.

37
  • To lower NOx, two systems are used
  • exhaust gas recirculation sends part of the
    exhaust stream back into the intake manifold
    which reduces the combustion temperature and
    decreases NOx production (tolerated when
    power'' is not required)
  • a second catalytic converter can be used in
    series with the HC/CO converter to decompose NOx
    to O and N.

38
  • Best options are switching to less polluting
    transportation systems!
  • Readings for next week Text Chapters 7,8
  • Anderson (2009) and Ashmore Dimitroulopoulou
    (2009) papers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com