What is GMD? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

What is GMD?

Description:

Dan Lunt, James Annan, Julia Hargreaves, Ian Rutt, Rolf Sander ... Numerical Methods: Annan, Rutt, Sandu, Tobis. Oceanography: Roberts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:319
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: paleoB
Category:
Tags: gmd | annan | bugfixes

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is GMD?


1
  • What is GMD?
  • Why do we need it?
  • Who is involved?
  • How does it work?

2
  • Geoscientific Model Development (GMD) is an
    international scientific journal dedicated to the
    publication and public discussion of the
    description, development and evaluation of
    numerical models of the Earth System and its
    components. Manuscript types considered for
    peer-reviewed publication are
  • Model descriptions
  • Development and Technical papers
  • Benchmarking papers
  • Model intercomparison descriptions

3
  • Geoscientific model descriptions, from box
    models to GCMs
  • Development and Technical papers, describing
    development such as new parameterisations or
    technical aspects of running models such as the
    reproducibility of results
  • Papers describing new standard experiments for
    assessing model performance, or novel ways of
    comparing model results with observational data
  • Model intercomparison descriptions, including
    experimental details and project protocols.

4
A few Case Studies of bad practice. (the
names have been changed to protect the innocent!)
5
  • A few Case Studies of bad practice.
  • (the names have been changed to protect the
    innocent!)
  • Papers containing too much model description
    cut down or even rejected.

6
  • A few Case Studies of bad practice.
  • (the names have been changed to protect the
    innocent!)
  • Papers containing too much model description
    cut down or even rejected.

There is 14 pages of models description, and
only 6 pages of experiments, results and
discussion. It appears to me that
needs more scientific analysis for
publishing.
7
  • A few Case Studies of bad practice.
  • (the names have been changed to protect the
    innocent!)
  • Tracibility of model versions..

8
  • A few Case Studies of bad practice.
  • (the names have been changed to protect the
    innocent!)
  • Tracibility of model versions..

there is no need to worry, when you get more
barren than with the Journal 1 version. The
version, which is on the web, produces more
barren, because the water balance has been
improved (Journal 2), which leads to drier
conditions .. You can look at the latest
publication from in Journal 3
9
  • A few Case Studies of bad practice.
  • (the names have been changed to protect the
    innocent!)
  • Loss of institution memory..

10
  • A few Case Studies of bad practice.
  • (the names have been changed to protect the
    innocent!)
  • Loss of institution memory..

It turns out that the have lost the input
files and code used to create the boundary
conditions for their standard control
simulation.
11
A few Case Studies of bad practice. (the
names have been changed to protect the innocent!)
12
A few Case Studies of bad practice. (the
names have been changed to protect the
innocent!)
1.8 oC
1.8 oC
13
  • A few Case Studies of bad practice.
  • (the names have been changed to protect the
    innocent!)
  • Undocumented irreproducibility across
    platforms.

1.8 oC
1.8 oC
14
  • A few Case Studies of bad practice.
  • (the names have been changed to protect the
    innocent!)
  • MIP descriptions too detailed

.the paper contained some description of the
experimental design and also some results. .one
of the reviewers thought more science was
required to make it publishable, and suggested
cutting various bits out. .once the protocol
description and discussion was given its freedom
it actually became rather interesting, as well as
being an awful lot easier to follow.
15
Advisory Board Executive Editors Topical
Editors
Garry Clarke, Paul Crutzen, John Shepherd, Carl
Wunsch Dan Lunt, James Annan, Julia Hargreaves,
Ian Rutt, Rolf Sander Atmospheric Sciences
Boucher, Grewe, Hazeleger, Jöckel,
Sander Biogeosciences Ridgwell Climate and Earth
System Modelling Banks, Boucher, Goose,
Hargreaves, Hazeleger, Kawamiya, Lawrence, Lunt,
Marti, Otto-Bliesner Cryosphere Huybrechts,
Ritz, Rutt Hydrology Bates, Coe Numerical
Methods Annan, Rutt, Sandu, Tobis Oceanography
Roberts Solar-terrestrial Science Koller Solid
Earth Gross, Muhlhaus, Yuen
16
  • Missing subject area
  • Planetary and Solar System Sciences

17
Advisory Board Executive Editors Topical
Editors
Garry Clarke, Paul Crutzen, John Shepherd, Carl
Wunsch Dan Lunt, James Annan, Julia Hargreaves,
Ian Rutt, Rolf Sander Atmospheric Sciences
Boucher, Grewe, Hazeleger, Jöckel Biogeosciences
Ridgwell Climate and Earth System Modelling
Banks, Goose, Kawamiya, Lawrence, Marti,
Otto-Bliesner Cryosphere Huybrechts,
Ritz Hydrology Bates, Coe Numerical Methods
Sandu, Tobis Oceanography Roberts Solar-terrestri
al Science Koller Solid Earth Gross, Muhlhaus,
Yuen
Europe (17) North America (9) Asia
(3) Australasia (2)
18
  • Detailed model description papers.
  • May include a user manual and actual code (as
    supplementary information).
  • Submission of short papers describing
    subsequent model development and bug-fixes will
    be encouraged. These papers will be
    electronically linked to the orginal, allowing a
    portfolio to be developed.

19
  • Detailed model description papers.
  • May include a user manual and actual code (as
    supplementary information).
  • Submission of short papers describing
    subsequent model development and bug-fixes will
    be encouraged. These papers will be
    electronically linked to the orginal, allowing a
    portfolio to be developed.
  • Traceability and Reproducibility

20
A traditional model.
Results papers
some development
Technical Notes
some more development
21
A traditional model.
Results papers
some development
Technical Notes
some more development
A model published in GMD
GMD paper v.1
22
A traditional model.
Results papers
some development
Technical Notes
some more development
A model published in GMD
GMD paper v.1
Results papers
23
A traditional model.
Results papers
some development
Technical Notes
some more development
A model published in GMD
GMD paper v.1
Results papers
GMD paper v.2
24
A traditional model.
Results papers
some development
Technical Notes
some more development
A model published in GMD
GMD paper v.1
Results papers
GMD paper v.2
25
A traditional model.
Results papers
some development
Technical Notes
some more development
A model published in GMD
GMD paper v.1
Results papers
GMD paper v.2
GMD paper v.3
26
A traditional model.
Results papers
some development
Technical Notes
some more development
A model published in GMD
GMD paper v.1
Results papers
GMD paper v.2
GMD paper v.3
27
A traditional model.
Results papers
some development
Technical Notes
some more development
A model published in GMD
GMD paper v.1
Results papers
GMD paper v.2
GMD paper v.3
28
  • GMD will provide a means by which the hard work
    of model developers can be formally recognised
    and published.
  • All papers to include model name and version
    number in title.
  • Special Issues for very large models, such as
    GCMs.
  • First 1000 pages are free!
  • Standard EGU format, including Open Access,
    Open Reviews, Discussions paper.

29
http//www.geoscientific-model-development.net
30
http//www.geoscientific-model-development.net
  • Accepting contributions via the webpage NOW!
  • First paper currently in GMDD (discussions
    journal)
  • Any questions, contact the Executive Editors

gmd-executive-editors_at_copernicus.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com