AUTO INSURANCE AND SOCIETY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

AUTO INSURANCE AND SOCIETY

Description:

Every licensed driver must have auto liability insurance to operate a vehicle ... voluntary market from mainline insurers such as State Farm, Allstate, GEICO, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: fishe
Category:
Tags: and | auto | insurance | society | geico

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AUTO INSURANCE AND SOCIETY


1
AUTO INSURANCE AND SOCIETY
2
COMPENSATING AUTO ACCIDENT VICTIMS
  • Compulsory Insurance Laws
  • Every licensed driver must have auto liability
    insurance to operate a vehicle
  • Physical Damage is not required
  • Enforcement Issue
  • In many states, 10 or more of the drivers do not
    carry insurance
  • Financial Responsibility Laws
  • Proof after the accident or conviction
  • Usually moderate amounts such as 25K per person
    and 50K per accident for liability
  • Unsatisfied Judgment Funds
  • Uninsured Motorists Coverage
  • No pay- no play
  • Uninsured driver cannot sue negligent drivers for
    non-economic damages
  • No Fault Insurance

3
Auto Insurance Plans and Non-Standard Auto
Insurers
  • The system must make insurance available to
    everyone qualified to purchase it
  • Most people purchase insurance in the voluntary
    market from mainline insurers such as State Farm,
    Allstate, GEICO, etc.
  • For higher risk insureds, there are non-standard
    auto insurers who specialize in this business
  • Higher rates
  • More severe merit rating
  • Payment plans
  • For insureds that cannot obtain insurance in the
    voluntary market, they can obtain auto insurance
    in the Auto Insurance Plans
  • Industry run systems for allocating insureds to
    participating companies
  • Uniform rates, contracts, and payment plans
  • Everything else by company

4
Restrictions on Rating Variables
  • State requirement is that rates cannot be
    inadequate, excessive, or unfairly
    discriminatory
  • Class rating uses age, sex, marital status, use,
    accident and conviction history, credit score and
    other variables to rate
  • Actuarial data must support use of these rating
    factors
  • Statistical connection rather than a causal
    connection
  • Since auto insurance is at least encouraged to be
    purchased by the state, the state has an interest
    in what rating variables are used
  • Different restrictions by state

5
RATEMAKING
6
OBJECTIVES OF RATEMAKING
  • Distribute premium charges fairly across all
    risks insured
  • Provide for appropriate premium to cover losses,
    expenses, and profit
  • Minimize the change in premium from one period to
    the next to minimize renewal churning (renewal
    to renewal change)
  • Loss prevention
  • Satisfy state regulations and so gain approval
  • Not inadequate, excessive, or unfairly
    discriminatory
  • Others

7
TYPES OF RATEMAKING
  • Based on as many statistics as are available for
    the type of risk insured
  • Types of ratemaking
  • Judgmental
  • Underwriters play key role
  • Used for large and unusual risks such as bridges
    and tunnels, special events, and so on
  • Not statistically based for the most part
  • Class rating
  • Sufficient statistics to separate risks into a
    number of classes
  • Young drivers/adult drivers
  • Drivers without convictions/ drivers with
    convictions
  • Business use/pleasure use
  • Underwriters determine the definition of a
    class/category and into what class a risk goes
  • Actuaries use loss statistics to determine the
    necessary rate to charge
  • Used for the mass market lines auto, homeowners,
    workers compensation
  • Merit rating
  • Schedule rating
  • Experience
  • Retrospective rating

8
KEY TERMINOLOGY
  • Exposure one unit of risk to be transferred-e.g.
    one car for one year
  • Annual premium the amount to be charged for one
    exposure per year
  • Incurred loss the amount of claims payment
    including all reserves
  • Pure Premium the expected losses per exposure
    per year incurred loss/exposure
  • Example the pure premium for one car insured for
    one year is 600

9
Methods of class ratemakingpure premium
  • Pure Premium premium must provide for the
    average insured loss per exposure and then be
    loaded for all expenses, contingencies plus
    profit
  • Example 10,000 cars with 6,000,000 in total
    losses expenses at 20 of premium
  • 6,000,000/10,000 600 pure premium
  • 600/.80 750 final premium loaded for losses
  • Therefore, premium per car is 750 to cover all
    losses and expenses

10
Methods of class ratemakingloss ratio
  • Loss ratio incurred losses/ premium
  • Permissible loss ratio proportion of premium
    devoted to losses, generally 1- expense ratio
  • Rate level change incurred loss ratio in
    experience period/ permissible loss ratio
  • Example for 2007 the loss ratio is 75 and the
    expense ratio is 20
  • The projected loss ratio is 75 without a rate
    change
  • The permissible loss ratio is 80- that is, 20
    of the premium is devoted to expenses and 80 is
    devoted to losses
  • Then the rate change is 75/80-1 .9375 1
    -.0625

11
RATEMAKING ISSUES STATISTICS
  • Source of the statistics
  • Statistical plan
  • Defined plan for each class if business
  • May be at company level or at industry level
  • Economies of scale for a large company
  • Insurance Services Office
  • National Council on Compensation Insurance

12
RATEMAKING ISSUES ADJUSTMENTS
  • Estimate of incurred losses
  • Loss reserving
  • The shorter the tail the better the estimate
  • Loss development
  • Problems with long tailed lines
  • Inflation and Trend
  • Losses must be adjusted to the level for the time
    period the rates are in effect
  • What inflation factor to use
  • CPI
  • Company data on loss trend changes
  • How long a period should the losses be adjusted
    for?
  • Midpoint of experience period to time when
    average loss will occur
  • Removal of non-repeating or non-allowed expenses
  • Punitive damage awards
  • Campaign contributions
  • Other

13
CASE STUDY RATEMAKING FOR PERSONAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com