Title: Sin ttulo de diapositiva
1Site-specific Wild Oat Operation Program (SWOOP)
C Fernandez-Quintanilla, J Barroso, D Ruiz Centre
for Environmental Studies, CSIC A Ribeiro, B
Diaz, MC Garcia Alegre, D Guinea Institute of
Automatics , CSIC
21. Associations among site properties and
abundance of wild oats
3Soil types
Wild oat density
2
3
1
42. Detection systems for wild oat patches
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7Counting contacts
8Visual assesment / walk
9Visual assesment / combine
10Economic comparison (C/ha) between the three
assessment methods
Method Contacts Visual/walk
Visual/combine
Sampling cost 36 36 9
Herbicide cost 33 25
18
Fixed costs 289 289
289
Yield benefit 390
387 382
NET RETURN 32 37 66
113. Testing the SWOOP concept
12Infestation map
Infestation level
0 (lt0,1 panícules/m2)
1 (0,1-1 panícules/m2)
2 (1-10 panícules/m2)
3 (gt 10 panícules/m2)
13Treatment map
Treatments
of area
None 28
Assert 0.6 l/ha 43
Assert 1.25 l/ha 22
Assert 2.5 l/ha 7
14Effects on barley yields
154. Studying the spatial stability of wild oat
patches
16From season to season
Relationship between
- panicle density (at harvest
time) and - seedling density
(at treatment time, next year)
Abundance
Presence
R2 0,59
17Among various seasons
N
1999 2000 2001
2002
STABILITY IN LOCATION
18STABILITY IN LOCATION
Test for stability of spatial distribution
(Syrjala, 1996)
19STABILITY IN DENSITY
Seedlings/m2
2002
1999
2000
2001
20STABILITY IN DENSITY
4
y -1,0424x 2086
2
R
0,81
3
y -0,9756x 1951,9
2
log seedlings/m2
2
R
0,69
1
y -0,587x 1174,5
0
2
R
0,61
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Years