Title: Contract certainty
1Contract certainty
- October 2005 Market Reform
2Structure of presentation
- The FSA challenge
- Measurement and targets
- Defining contract certainty
- Responsibilities what must you do differently?
- Resources for market organisations
- Code of Practice and guidance on how to fulfil
Code - Checklist
- There is more to come
- FAQs
- Detailed process narrative for Lloyds
- Guidance on signing rules etc.
3Contract certainty the Challenge
- Absolute contract certainty is not achievable
- Contract certainty is an important commercial
issue - Primarily about agreement of terms
- Contract certainty is an important issue for our
regulator - Tiners speech end to deal now, detail later
- End 2006 deadline lit the already smouldering
platform - commercial imperative was hot anyway
- Answering the FSA requires
- Clear plan pulling together components
- Measurable progress against that plan
- Each firms measured participation
4Contract certainty meeting FSA challenge
- Key targets agreed with the FSA
- LMP slips CC attributes
- 95 June 2005
- 97 December 2005
- 99 March 2006
- Achieve contract certainty
- 30 of business end 2005
- 60 mid 2006
- 85 end 2006
- Appropriate evidence of cover within 30 days
5- Assessing LMP slips against a standard set of
criteria is one way of assessing the quality of
contract certainty
6Contract certainty Quality
Contract certainty attributes of LMP slip
Source MRPO
7Contract certainty the definition
- Agreed definition
- Contract certainty is achieved by the complete
and final agreement of all terms (including
signed lines) between the insured and insurers
before inception. - And
- Full wording must be agreed before any
underwriter formally commits to the contract
8Resources for market organisations
- Early October publication
- Code of Practice with principles and guidance on
how to fulfil the CoP. Some examples - Signed lines
- Stamp conditions
- Underwriter subjectivities
- Two page CC checklist
- Is this risk contract certain?
- Quality assurance checks
- Centrally collected data LMP slip audit and XIS
sourced data - CII training courses
- MRG/MRPO stamp of approval
9Contract certainty what must firms do?
- Apply the Code of Practice and accompanying
Guidance - Improve checking pre-bind
- Follow the Checklist build it into routine
processes - Use internal quality assurance guidelines
- Measurement managerial magic wand will not
satisfy the FSA - Must be able to demonstrate achievement of CC
- LMP slip targets sample of slips for LMP slip
audit checking - Agree wordings presentation
- Either referenced or fully worded - brokers
call/Insurers response - Note Across all business lines brokers lead
- Sponsorship, project manager done. Whats the
project look like? Training? Incentives? - Inform MRPO of formal Board sign-off of Code of
Practice
10Contract certainty what must insurers do?
- Confirm that the wording is fully specified
before writing a line - Quality check the submission for quality
completeness (or authorise a service provider to
do so) before formally committing to the
contract, using the CC checklist and internal
quality guidelines (e.g. for Lloyds their
published checking requirements) - Provide a sample of slips for LMP slip audit
checking - Only use line conditions subjectivities in
accordance with contract certainty guidelines - Write lines to stand, or request brokers to
provide signed lines if required earlier than 30
days after inception - Ensure that all post-inception changes are
processed as endorsements - Record the number of risks meeting / not meeting
contract certainty
11Contract certainty what must brokers do?
- Prepare fully-claused submissions, including
clear responsibilities for drafting, checking
issuance of appropriate evidence of cover - Quality check the submission against the CC
Checklist and any internal quality requirements - Issue appropriate evidence of cover within 30
days of inception - Signed lines notified to insurers within 30 days
and, on request, available at inception - Do not obtain further lines after inception once
the order has been filled - Notify the client of contract certainty
exceptions, as appropriate - Record the number of risks meeting/not meeting
contract certainty and provide these statistics
to the MRPO on a monthly basis - Process all post-inception changes as formal
endorsements
122006 Objectives
- Fully-claused placing submissions
- Increased use of model wordings and clauses (as
basis for negotiation) - Wording/technical staff involved in placing
process - Early agreement and checking of the submission by
all parties - Early delivery of evidence of cover for the
client ideally before inception but within 30
days of inception - Declarations under Binding Authorities evidenced
by issuance of certificates in an approved form
(guidance to be issued shortly)
13- A means of assessing the quality of contract
certainty that is available now is to monitor the
Bureaus rejection rate of policy/wordings checks
14Contract certainty Quality
XIS rejection rate of stage 2 checks
Source XIS, excludes slip policies and time on
risk policies
15Contract certainty
- October 2005 Market Reform
16Contract Certainty Principles
- Broker will provide submissions that satisfy the
contract certainty definition and checklist to
obtain firm quotes and place firm orders. - Each insurer will be satisfied that the
submission meets the contract certainty
definition and checklist before formally
committing to the contract, ensuring that any
conditions or subjectivities are clearly
expressed. - Brokers will notify all terms to their client and
obtain their clients agreement before inception. - Brokers will calculate signed lines by inception
and notify them to each insurer no later than 30
days after inception date, or by inception date
on request. - Brokers and insurers will not take part in
post-inception over-placing. - Brokers and insurers will ensure that
post-inception amendments are documented and
agreed as endorsements - Brokers and insurers will collect and maintain
data on their contract certainty performance at
individual contract level. - Brokers and insurers will ensure that appropriate
evidence of cover, including security, is issued
within 30 days of inception date.
17Guidance spelling out the principles Form of
presentation
- The full wording of the submission to insurers
will be a combination of - wordings and/or clauses
- either referenced and/or full text
- bespoke and/or model material.
18Guidance spelling out the principles Quotes
- A firm quote should be given only where the
insurer has ensured that the submission meets the
contract certainty definition - An indicative quote may be given where the
submission is not compliant or has not been
checked - An indicative quote supported by a follower may,
if they have so specified, become firm once the
slip leader has changed his indicative quote to a
firm quote or bound line
19Guidance spelling out the principles Quality
checking
- For consistency insurers will use the same
checklist as brokers to demonstrate contract
certainty - Insurers may wish to outsource technical checking
to a service provider - The aim will be to perform all necessary contract
certainty checks before formally committing to
the contract (using the contract certainty
checklist and any internal requirements e.g. for
Lloyds their published checking requirements) - A follower needs to consider what reliance to
place upon the leaders quality checking, taking
into account any service provider input
20Guidance spelling out the principles As
original wording
- The London Market may follow the policy form of
another insurer i.e. As Original, As
Co-Insurer, As Warranty Company, As
Underlying/Overlying - The wording may then be considered to be
specified as long as the prior wording is either
attached or clearly identified, and hence could
be obtained to resolve coverage disputes.
21Guidance spelling out the principles Stamp and
line conditions
- Insurers will seek to phase out the use of stamp
conditions - i.e. the routine use of a condition within their
underwriting stamp, irrespective of whether it is
relevant to a specific contract - Relevant conditions should be a line condition
- For LMP Slips, under the appropriate heading
- There may be conditions that cannot be expressed
efficiently under existing LMP slip headings - Analysis to confirm
- Modify the LMP Slip format, in due course.
- In the interim such stamp conditions may continue
to be used, providing their meaning is fully and
clearly expressed.
22Guidance spelling out the principles
Underwriter subjectivities
- Issues may remain outstanding after inception,
e.g. subject to survey - Subjectivities should be imposed within the
placing document - The responsibilities and timescales for
resolution, and the consequences of failure, must
also be clearly specified - Where a subjectivity is outstanding at inception
then it must be stated as a fully-claused
condition of the coverage given
23Guidance spelling out the principles Signed
lines
- Calculation method to be explicit on the slip,
that allows the insurer to determine how their
line will be calculated (but subject to client
wishes) - Brokers to calculate signed lines by inception
- Available to carrier by inception By writing
line to stand or, asking broker - Broker will routinely provide to carriers within
30 days (normally via de-linked closings) - Carriers using the bureau may need to change
their systems to receive this information. - Brokers and insurers commit to no post-inception
over-placing
24Guidance spelling out the principles
Appropriate evidence of cover
- Insurance Policy (Bureau or Company)
- Copy of Complete Slip
- Certificate of Insurance
- Broker Insurance Document
25Guidance spelling out the principles Monitoring
performance
- Each organisation is individually responsible to
the FSA for its own performance, and should
collect data using the contract certainty
checklist - Failures to achieve contract certainty should be
recorded - Insurers may seek to use data collected by a
service provider - Brokers will provide aggregated data to the
Market Reform Programme Office monthly, as
follows overall contract volumes, the percentage
achieving contract certainty, and the percentage
evidenced within 30 days of inception date - Brokers will notify the client appropriately
where a failure of contract certainty materially
affects coverage - The Market Reform Programme Office will continue
analysis of exceptions/challenges and publish
further guidance on this topic as soon as possible
26Contract Certainty Checklist
27Contract Certainty Checklist
28Contract Certainty Attributes
- Is the submission clear and unambiguous?
- Is law and jurisdiction and arbitration clearly
referenced and complete? - Are all terms clear and unambiguous?
- Are all duties clearly allocated, including
processing of contract changes, document
production and claims processing? - Is any supporting information clearly referenced?
- Is the submission compliant with regulatory
requirements?
292006 Objectives
- Fully-claused placing submissions
- Increased use of model wordings and clauses (as
basis for negotiation) - Wording/technical staff involved in placing
process - Early agreement and checking of the submission by
all parties - Early delivery of evidence of cover for the
client ideally before inception but within 30
days of inception - Declarations under Binding Authorities evidenced
by issuance of certificates in an approved form
(guidance to be issued shortly)
30CoP/Checklist Feedback Received
- A fine Code, but will Insurers do it? -
Evening Standard - Can we have 1,000 copies for our staff?
- Im fine with them but will everybody else
stick to them? - Some points of clarification requested
- Guidance or Prescriptive?
- Need to phase out all Stamp Conditions?
- Status of Firm/Indicative Quotes? workload
implications. - Checklist guidance on Supporting Information.
- Broker will notify all terms to their client
- Insurers responsibility for Evidence of Cover
- Your questions?
31Contract certainty
- October 2005 Market Reform