TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDIES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDIES

Description:

To Study the effects of antistripping agents on asphalt-aggregate ... Basalt (granite) (Western Province, TAIF) Limestone (Riyadh Area) Properties of Aggregates ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1627
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: arc56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDIES


1
Effect of Anti-Stripping Agents in
Asphalt-Aggregate Interactions
by
Dr. Mohammad Nahid Siddiqui Prof. Mohammad Farhat
Ali Eng. Mirza Ghouse Baig
Department of Chemistry King Fahd University of
Petroleum Minerals Dhahran, 31261 Saudi Arabia
2
Objective
  • To Study the effects of antistripping agents
    on asphalt-aggregate mixtures using
    Adsorption-desorption and IR test methods.

3
Presentation OutLine
  • Introduction and Background
  • Moisture Damage
  • Anti-Stripping Additives
  • Experimental
  • Asphalt Aggregate Properties
  • Adsorption-desorption Testing
  • Results and Discussion
  • Conclusions

4
Moisture Damage
Significance A high degree of stripping was
detected in between 25 to 50 on various pavement
sites inspected in Saudi Arabia during late
1990.
5
Moisture Damage
Main Focus To Improve aggregate asphalt bonding.
6
Antistripping Additives
  • Organic Small Molecules
  • Amines, Silanes
  • Polyamines, Amidoamines
  • Inorganic Aggregate Treatments
  • Hydrated Lime
  • Portland Cement
  • Polymeric Agents
  • Functionalized Butadiene
  • Styrene-Butadiene

7
Introduction Background
  • Asphalt-aggregate interactions in pavements
  • directly affect the adhesion bond strength.
  • Chemistry of asphalt surface chemistry of
  • aggregates particularly affects the
    interactions.

8
Asphalt-Aggregate Bonding
Aggregate
Asphalt
  • Wettability
  • Viscosity (temp)
  • Composition (oxygen)
  • Durability
  • Surface chemistry (mineral composition)
  • Surface texture
  • Porosity
  • Surface condition (cleanliness, moisture)

9
Effect of Surface Film on Aggregate Coverage
(after Hubbard)
10
Effect of Aggregate Surface on Texture Adhesion
(after Hubbard)
11
Contact Angle in an Aggregate, Asphalt and Water
System (after pfeiffer).
12
Asphalt-Aggregates Bonding
13
Effect of Polarity on Adhesion (after Hubbard)
14
Molecular Orientation (after Hubbard)
15
Experimental Work
  • Asphalts from Two Refineries
  • Riyadh Refinery (RY)
  • Ras Tanura Refinery (RT)
  • Aggregates from Three different regions
  • Taif
  • Eastern Province (EP)
  • Riyadh
  • Three Anti-Stripping Agents
  • Iterlene IN/400-S
  • Cecabase 260
  • Polyram L200

16
Elemental Analysis (wt ) of RT and RY Asphalts
17
Physical Characteristics of RT and RY
Asphalts
18
Aggregates
  • Limestone (Eastern Province)
  • Basalt (granite) (Western Province, TAIF)
  • Limestone (Riyadh Area)

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Properties of Aggregates
23
Anti-Stripping Agents
24
Chromatography Column
25
Adsorption Equation
Ai VC (A1 A2)/50 A1
where,
Ai initial adsorption, mg/gm V volume of
solution in the column at the time A2 is
measured, ml 00.0 ml C initial concentration
of asphalt in solution, gm/l 1.2 g/l A1
first absorbance reading A2 second absorbance
reading after 6.5 hours
26
Results Discussion
Initial and Net Adsorption Values for
Riyadh Asphalt with Cesabase-260
27
Results
(Contd)
Initial and Net Adsorption Values for Ras-Tanura
Asphalt with Cesabase-260
28
Results
(Contd)
Initial and Net Adsorption Values for Ras-Tanura
Asphalt with Iterlene 400-S
29
Results
(Contd)
Typical Comparison on Riyadh asphalt-aggregate mix
30
Results
(Contd)
Typical Comparison on Ras Tanura
asphalt-aggregate mix
31
Conclusions
  • Based on the results of this study following
    conclusions were drawn.
  • Type of Aggregates has significant effect on
    absorption behavior.
  • Different aggregate showed different adsorption
    for same asphalt.
  • Moisture sensitivity for each asphalt-aggregate
    combinations depend on the type of antistripping
    agent used.

32
Conclusions
(Contd)
  • No single antistripping agent could work with all
    three aggregate types studied. Therefore,
    selection of proper antistripping agent will be
    unique for each project.
  • Among the three antistripping agents studied
  • Cecabase was found to be more effective with
    Riyadh asphalt mixtures.
  • Iterlene was found to be more effective with Ras
    Tanura asphalt mixtures

33
Recommendations
  • More fundamental work is needed on the chemistry
    of asphalt-aggregate interaction for a better
    understanding of the chemical compositional
    factors that control asphalt properties..

34
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com