Appearance and Market Appeal Claude Weathers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 83
About This Presentation
Title:

Appearance and Market Appeal Claude Weathers

Description:

Graffiti. Paved Surfaces. Public Spaces and Amenities ... Appearance: Graffiti. Graffiti: Crude inscriptions or drawings on a building surface that are easily visible ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 84
Provided by: shausk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Appearance and Market Appeal Claude Weathers


1
Appearance and Market AppealClaude Weathers
2
Appearance and Market Appeal
  • Assesses the curb appeal or marketability of the
    project
  • Not an inspection
  • Identifies appearance issues across 12 appearance
    categories
  • Appearance is fundamental to marketability and is
    a sign of good management

3
Appearance Contrast with Inspections
  • Inspections (e.g. PASS)
  • Strict criteria
  • Measurement, quantification
  • Appearance and Market Appeal
  • Generalized criteria used as guidance only
  • Professional judgment
  • Market appeal and livability
  • Substitutes for market feedback

4
Appearance Projects and Sites
  • Many projects consist of multiple sites
  • Visit can focus on
  • The entire project holistically
  • Each individual site at the project
  • A representative selection of sites
  • Review enough sites to get a general sense of
    overall appearance

5
Appearance Categories
  • Project Entrance
  • Landscaping
  • Building Exterior
  • Graffiti
  • Paved Surfaces
  • Public Spaces and Amenities
  • Fencing, Rails, Porches, Overhangs, and Ramps
  • Windows
  • Overall Project Appearance
  • Project Debris
  • Trash
  • Units

6
Appearance Objectivity
  • Evaluation will be as fair and comprehensive as
    possible
  • Evaluated based on what HUD sees on the visit
  • Architecture should not affect evaluation
  • Good enough for Public Housing is not acceptable

7
Appearance Process
  • Purpose is to generally assess the project
  • Not to simply identify problem areas
  • One problem does not constitute failure
  • Uses professional judgment for multiple
    instances of a single category
  • Reviews one category at a time
  • Review Does not take into account excuses for
    poor project appearance

8
Appearance Project Entrance
  • Based on the overall entrance to the project
  • Considers
  • Attractiveness
  • Appropriate signage
  • Plantings

9
Appearance Project Entrance
Main project entrance
10
Appearance Project Entrance
Main project entrance (all owned by project)
11
Appearance Project Entrance
Main project entrance
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Appearance Landscaping
  • All visible landscaping is included
  • Considers
  • Attractiveness
  • Maintenance
  • Overgrowth

16
Appearance Landscaping
Representative of all landscaping
17
Appearance Landscaping
Most significant landscaping at the project
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Appearance Building Exterior
  • Based on the state of the buildings exterior
    walls
  • Considers
  • Paint
  • Siding
  • Masonry
  • Different than overall appearance

22
Appearance Building Exterior
Representative of project exterior
23
Appearance Building Exterior
Typical building façade at the project
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Appearance Graffiti
  • Graffiti Crude inscriptions or drawings on a
    building surface that are easily visible
  • Not limited to the projects exterior
  • Considers
  • Amount
  • Location
  • Severity

28
Appearance Instances of Graffiti
Less Severe (back of building)
More Severe (front of building)
  • Any graffiti is a problem
  • Severity requires context

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Appearance Paved Surfaces
  • Based on the quality and maintenance of the
    projects paved surfaces (parking lots,
    driveways, sidewalks, etc.)
  • Considers
  • Appearance
  • Cracking
  • Pitting
  • Other problems

32
Appearance Paved Surfaces
Main project parking lot
33
Appearance Paved Surfaces
Worst damage on a large and otherwise well
maintained lot
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
Appearance Public Spaces and Amenities
  • Public spaces include hallways, common rooms
    (e.g. laundry), foyers, playgrounds, etc.
  • Considers
  • Appearance
  • Cleanliness

37
Appearance Public Spaces and Amenities
Primary interior public space/amenity
Primary exterior public space/amenity
38
Appearance Public Spaces and Amenities
Only exterior public space
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
Appearance Fencing, Railing, Porches, Overhangs,
Ramps (FRPOR)
  • Based on whether fencing, railing, porches,
    overhangs, and ramps add to or detract from the
    overall project appearance
  • Each item should be evaluated if present
  • Evaluation is based on appearance, not existence

42
Appearance FRPOR
Representative of project FRPOR
43
(No Transcript)
44
Appearance FRPOR
Other FRPOR appear in similar condition
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
Appearance Windows
  • Window treatments should be interpreted broadly
  • Considers
  • Torn treatments
  • Damaged treatments
  • Missing treatments
  • Treatments are considered regardless of whether
    they are supplied by the project or residents

48
Appearance Windows
  • Examples of damaged windows

49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
Appearance Overall Project Appearance
  • Contextualized by two factors
  • Whether or not the project is institutional
  • The projects appearance compared to the
    surrounding neighborhood
  • Holistic approach should be used

53
Appearance Overall Project Appearance(Individual
Building)
Typical scattered-site building
54
Appearance Overall Project Appearance
Main project façade
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
Appearance Project Debris
  • Amount and severity of any debris throughout the
    project
  • Considers
  • General cleanliness
  • Trash
  • Abandoned vehicles
  • Other debris

58
Appearance Project Debris
No visible debris
59
Appearance Project Debris
Debris located behind project maintenance shed
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
Appearance Trash
  • Based on interior and exterior trash receptacles
  • Cans
  • Dumpsters
  • Chutes
  • Considers whether trash receptacles are clean and
    properly enclosed
  • Little-to-no trash lying around receptacles
  • Reasonably well enclosed

63
Appearance Trash
Only project dumpster
64
Appearance Trash
Only project dumpster
Only project dumpster
65
(No Transcript)
66
(No Transcript)
67
(No Transcript)
68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
Appearance Units
  • Based on the number and severity of damaged
    and/or boarded-up units
  • Damage must be significant and noticeable
  • Unit interiors are not included

72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
76
(No Transcript)
77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
(No Transcript)
81
(No Transcript)
82
(No Transcript)
83
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com