Title: Outsourcing
1Outsourcing
- An easy way to increase profits
- Nike, Cisco, Apple outsource most of their
manufacturing - Each could focus on research, marketing
- Each has gotten into trouble
- 2001 Nike reported unexpected profit shortfalls
due to inventory problems - 2000 Cisco had to write down billions in
obsolete inventory - 1999 Apple was unable to meet customer demand
for new products
2Outsourcing Benefits and Risks
- Benefits
- Economies of scale reduce manufacturing costs
- Risk pooling demand uncertainties are
transferred - Reduced capital investment
- Focus on core competencies
- Increased flexibility
- Risks
- Loss of competitive knowledge
- Conflicting objectives
- Flexibility vs. long-term, stable commitments,
etc. - Consider the IBM PC example.
3A Framework for Outsourcing
- Reasons for outsourcing
- Dependency on capacity
- Dependency on knowledge
- Product architecture
- Integral products components are tightly
related - Designed as a system
- Not off-the-shelf components
- Evaluated based on system performance
- Modular products independent components
4A Framework for Outsourcing (Fine Whitney)
5The Move to B2B Commerce
6B2B is Huge...
Source Forrester Research, Inc.
7FreeMarkets Online
- FreeMarkets is an online market making firm that
enabled industrial buyers to link up with their
potential suppliers in a live electronic bidding - The end result of such interaction among a
network of suppliers was procurement cost savings
of about 15 for the buyers - The company was founded in 1995 and was on the
verge of breaking even in 1998 - It was expecting to receive commissions and fees
of nearly 6 million for arranging procurement of
200 million worth of industrial components and
parts
8The company went public in 12/99...
Freemarkets Stock Price
9Where is FreeMarkets today?
- For the three months ended in 3/31/01
- Revenue totaled 33M
- Net loss totaled 43.7M
- For the three months ended in 12/31/01
- Revenue totaled 44.8M
- Net loss totaled 2.8M
10Highly Fragmented
- Most product categories are highly fragmented,
with numerous suppliers each offering different
level of quality, service and pricing options - Buyers incur significant cost in the actual
purchase process - A buyer must invest internal resources to manage
the process of collecting, analyzing and acting
upon all the information in the market - In addition to purchase price companies spend
over 10 in additional procurement costs - On the suppliers side, there are significant
costs in using the manufacturing reps - These commissions range from 4 to 7 of purchase
price
11How Does FreeMarkets Online Create Value for its
Customers?
- Consulting/Purchase outsourcing
- Putting together specs, drawings, lot sizes,
documentation and RFQs - Identifying potential savings opportunities
- Identifying and qualifying suppliers
- Educating and training buyers
- Conducting the Competitive Bidding Event (CBE)
- Providing post bid analysis and support
12How Does FreeMarkets Online Create Value for its
Customers?
- Consulting/Purchase outsourcing
- Distribution Intermediary
13Traditional B2B Trading Exchanges
14Internet Based B2B Trading Exchanges
15How Does FreeMarkets Online Create Value for its
Customers?
- Consulting/Purchase outsourcing
- Distribution Intermediary
- Network Enabler/Software Provider
16What are the Barriers for the buyers?
- Elimination of established relationships with the
suppliers and their representatives - Elimination of manufacturing reps could result in
loss of convenience
17What is the value to the suppliers?
- Less value for the suppliers
- Commission costs fell from 7 to 2.5
- Table 7.5 implies reduction in commission by
174M(4.5)8M - Table 7.5 also shows 35M drop in revenue for the
suppliers - Suppliers could benefit from lower sales,
marketing and distribution costs and better
utilization of capacity
18The Revenue Model
- A hybrid of service fees and sales commissions
- FreeMarkets charged monthly fee from the buyer
based on the size of the market making team
dedicated to the event - Winning supplier paid sales commissions this was
paid in installments as suppliers shipped
products
19Problems with the revenue model
- Buyer side
- FreeMarkets invests substantially in a project
- Consulting revenue is independent of the value
created - Does not lead to another intensive purchasing
study for the customer - Gross margin on consulting is about 22
- Doesnt scale well
- Supplier side
- FreeMarkets does not represent the supplier
- FreeMarkets success depends on their ability to
identify many potential suppliers - Suppliers pay commissions to the company that
reduced their margins
20Vertical vs Horizontal Focus?
- Vertical
- Advantage FreeMarkets can capitalize on its deep
knowledge of supplier industries - Disadvantage Hard to scale-up
- Horizontal
- Advantage Ability to generate multiple contracts
from one buyers - Disadvantage FreeMarkets does not bring much
expertise to the transaction
21How about licensing the technology?
- Are buyers capable of using the technology by
themselves? - If not, how will this hurt?
- If they are, where is revenue going to come from?
- How can these problems be addressed?
22By the end of 1998
- FreeMarkets was pursuing the horizontal market
expansion - In 2000, the company started licensing its
software
23E-Marketplaces The Initial (95-99) business model
- The e-marketplace concept started as a new way to
procure products, particularly non-production
items. E-marketplaces - Expand everyones market reach
- Generate lower price for the buyers
- Cut operational costs for buyers and suppliers
- Automating the procurement process will reduce
processing cost per order from as high as 150 to
as low as 5 per order - Focus on liquidity
- Transaction fee paid by the suppliers
- Serve as a virtual distributor
24Problems with this Business Model
- Sellers resist paying a fee to the company whose
main objective is to reduce the purchase price - Buyers resist paying a fee
- The revenue model needs to be flexible
- Sometimes the wrong party is charged
- Low barriers to entry created a fragmented
industry flooded with participants - Just in the chemical industry there were about 30
e-markets
25Continuous evolution of the business model
- Transaction fees (typically paid by the sellers)
- Sometimes the wrong party is charged
- Buyers and suppliers resist paying
- Subscription fees (typically paid by the buyer)
- Depends on a number of dimensions
- Licensing the software
26Evolving Market Types
- Value-added independent e-markets
- They are expanding their offering to include
inventory management and financial services
(Zoho) supply chain planning (Covisint, e2open,
Converge, TheSupply)
27A Framework for eProcurement
- Type of Component
- Strategic Components
- Part of the finished product
- Not industry specific company specific
- Examples PC motherboard and chassis
- Commodity Products
- Can be purchased from a large number of suppliers
- Price is determined by market forces
- Examples Memory unit in a PC
- Indirect Material
- MRO
28A Framework for eProcurement
- Level of Risk
- Uncertain Demand (Inventory risk)
- Volatile market price (Price Risk)
- Component availability (Shortage Risk)
29Risk Commodity Products
- Can be purchased either
- in the open market through on-line auction, or
- through the use of long term contracts
- Long term contracts guarantee certain level of
supply but may be risky for the buyer - Inventory risk, shortage risk or price risk
30A Framework for eProcurement
- Indirect Material
- Typically low risk and hence the focus is on
content based hubs. - The objective is to use an MRO-hub that
specializes in unifying catalogs from many
suppliers - Examples MRO.com, Grainger on-line catalogs
31Grainger
- W. W. Grainger has been selling industrial
supplies for 72 years - In 1995 Grainger established Grainger.com, an
on-line catalogue for more than 220,000 products
from 12,000 suppliers - In 1999, Grainger experienced revenue growth of
102M through its internet channel - The MRO supply industry is growing at a rate of
3-4 a year. From 1996 to 1999 Grainger internet
sales grew 32 a year and 20 in offline due to
customers that were lured to Grainger from the
web site
32A Framework for eProcurement
- Strategic Components
- Typically high risk components that can be
purchased from a small number of suppliers - The objective is to use private or
consortia-based e-marketplace. - The focus is on an e-marketplace that allow
collaboration with the suppliers
33Consortia or Private?
- Transaction volume
- Number of suppliers
- Cost of building and maintaining the site
- The importance of protecting proprietary business
practices - Technology and product life cycles
34A Framework for eProcurement
- Commodity Products
- Products go directly into finished goods
- High risk
- Many potential options to choose from
- Long Term Contracts
- Buyer and supplier commit to certain volume
(called the commitment level) - Supplier guarantees a level of supply for a
committed price - Flexible, or Option Contracts
- Buyer pre-pay a relatively small fraction of the
product price up-front, in return for a
commitment from the supplier to satisfy demand up
to a certain level (called the option level) - The buyer can purchase any amount up to the
option level by paying additional price for each
unit purchased - Spot Purchasing
35A Framework for eProcurement A Portfolio Approach
Option Level
H L
N/A
Inventory Risk (Supplier)
Inventory Risk (Buyer)
Price, Shortage Risks (Buyer)
Commitment Level
L H
36B2B Software Vendors
- Oracle (Indirect and Direct)
- i2 Technologies and Manugistics (Direct)
- Ariba (Indirect and Direct)
- Commerce One (Indirect and Direct)
- Agile (Direct)
- VerticalNet (Indirect)
37E-Procurement The reality
- Companies conducting greater than 20 of
procurement transactions online have reduced
their transaction processing cost by nearly a
third (Hackett Benchmarking) - Product savings and process cost improvements
effect operating cost by 10 (Credit Suisse First
Boston Technology Group)
38E-Procurement The reality
- To capture this benefits purchasing organization
needs to invest heavily in - Changing internal procurement processes
- Integrating e-marketplaces in internal systems
- Purchasing B2B applications, and
- Paying e-marketplace transaction fee/subscription
fee
Source Forrester Research
39Positive Aspects of Trading Exchanges (Companies
who use exchanges)
- Reduce costs or labor (31)
- Better access to products/vendors (24)
- Increase speed or efficiency (29)
- Access to more customers (21)
-
Source AMR Research
40Positive Aspects of Trading Exchanges (Companies
who plan to use exchanges)
- Reduce costs or labor (43)
- Better access to products/vendors (26)
- Increase speed or efficiency (23)
- Access to more customers (10)
-
Source AMR Research
41Negative Aspects of Trading Exchanges (Companies
use exchanges)
- Security trust (17)
- Start Up cost (5)
- Loss of face-to-face relationships (12)
- Lack of standards (5)
- Immature technology (5)
- Integration issues (7)
-
Source AMR Research
42Negative Aspects of Trading Exchanges (Companies
who plan to use exchanges)
- Security trust (16)
- Start Up cost (15)
- Loss of face-to-face relationships (11)
- Lack of standards (6)
- Immature technology (6)
- Integration issues (4)
- Pricing pressure (6)
Source AMR Research