The Effect of Gun Shows on Gunrelated Deaths - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Effect of Gun Shows on Gunrelated Deaths

Description:

1) Look only at surrounding areas, but crime guns travel ... In one study, the median time between gun purchase and suicide was 11 years ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: clie1
Learn more at: http://users.nber.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Effect of Gun Shows on Gunrelated Deaths


1
The Effect of Gun Shows on Gun-related Deaths
  • Mark Duggan
  • Randi Hjalmarsson
  • Brian A. Jacob
  • Discussant David Hemenway
  • September 2007

2
  • Contribution
  • Little written _at_ Gun Shows
  • Limitations

3
  • Underestimate Detrimental Effect
  • 1) Look only at surrounding areas, but crime
    guns travel
  • (e.g. 85 of guns used in crime in NYC from
    out of state)
  • Less of a problem for suicides

4
  • 2) Look only at effect in first few weeks but
    guns durable
  • In CA,
  • For crime guns, median time-to-crime is 6 years
    for
  • Wintemute GJ. et al.
  • Life cycle of crime guns a description based
    on guns recovered from young people in
    California. Ann Emerg Med, 2004 43(6)733-42
  • In Columbine shootings, the killers obtained
    guns from two separate individuals who purchased
    the guns for them months before at gun shows.

5
  • Even for suicides, most gun suicides occur years
    after the gun purchase
  • In one study, the median time between gun
    purchase and suicide was 11 years
  • Only 13 of firearm suicides in first YEAR.
  • Cummings P. et al.
  • Association between purchase
  • of a handgun and homicide or suicide.
  • Am J Public Health, 1997 87(6)974-8.

6
  • 3) Look only at gun death, not non-fatal
    injuries, gun use in crime and assault, guns used
    to intimidate (e.g. IPV).

7
  • B) Overestimate detrimental effect
  • 1) If gun shows largely affect timing of
    purchase
  • (due to convenience)
  • would buy at some other time place
  • (e.g. gun store, flea market)
  • 2) Possible benefits of guns (e.g. self
    defense).

8
  • Other limitations of the paper
  • Treat gun shows as homogeneous (until dichotomize
    by size of community)
  • But gun shows very different (e.g. CA shows
    unlike AZ shows), see Wintemute GJ. Gun shows
    across a multi-state American gun market
    observational evidence of the effects of
    regulatory policies. Inj Prev., 2007 13150-155.

9
  • Minor suggestions for the paper
  • Examine effects on gun suicide and non gun
    suicide
  • You need also show results for effect on total
    suicide

10
  • Need better literature review
  • Up-to-date data available
  • E.g.-- Gun stock data (discuss 1996 study)
  • Hepburn L. et al. U.S. gun stock
    results from the 2004 national firearms survey
    Inj Prev., 2007 1315-19.
  • -- Percent of suicides with a firearm
    (discuss 2001 data)
  • WISQARS provides data for 2004
  • -- State gun law information (discuss
    2003 study)
  • LCAV has current data.

11
  • b) Very incomplete review of studies linking guns
    and death

12
Private Guns, Public Health
  • 2006, Univ. of Michigan

13
Big problem with paper is the conclusion
  • (a) Our results provide little evidence to
    suggest that gun shows lead to any substantial
    increase in crime

14
  • (a) Our results provide little evidence to
    suggest that gun shows lead to any substantial
    increase in homicide

15
  • (a) Our results provide little evidence to
    suggest that gun shows lead to any substantial
    increase in homicide,
  • in that county

16
  • (a) Our results provide little evidence to
    suggest that gun shows lead to any substantial
    increase in homicide,
  • in that county, within a few weeks

17
  • Conclusions (cont.)
  • (b) Overall the resultssuggest that gun shows
    themselves do not impose large social costs
  • Actually find that for every 100 gun shows, five
    people die if
    value people at 3 million
  • Power calculations need a 10 increase in gun
    death
  • Given limitations, Im shocked at any
    significant finding.

18
  • The big social problem with gun shows are
  • sales without background checks
  • Policy proposals are designed not to eliminate
    gun shows, but to eliminate transfers without
    background checks at gun shows AND flea markets
    AND elsewhere
  • True, if eliminate only gun shows, less of an
    effect
  • Currently, for some 40 of gun transfers, no
    background check.

19
  • My largest concern
  • Data are from California
  • 1. 1989 CA eliminated the gun show loophole
  • -- every gun transfer requires a
    background check

20
  • My largest concern
  • Data are from California
  • 1. 1989 CA eliminated the gun show loophole
  • -- every gun transfer requires a
    background check
  • 2. Since 1953
  • Waiting Period (now 10 days) for gun
    purchases

21
  • (a) Our results provide little evidence to
    suggest that gun shows lead to any substantial
    increase in homicide,
  • in that county, within a few weeks, in states
    where there is no gun show loophole at gun shows,
    and where there is a 10-day waiting period for
    gun purchases.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com