Weapons Proliferation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Weapons Proliferation

Description:

Direct and indirect effects of proliferation 'Guns vs. butter' Attention to WMD, but proliferation applies to all types of weapons, including conventional ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: pzei
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Weapons Proliferation


1
Weapons Proliferation
2
Weapons Proliferation
  • Rapid increase in the number and destructive
    capability of armaments (SS, 2002, p. 11)
  • Direct and indirect effects of proliferation
  • Guns vs. butter
  • Attention to WMD, but proliferation applies to
    all types of weapons, including conventional

3
Types of Proliferation
  • Vertical Proliferation of Conventional Weapons
  • Horizontal Proliferation of Conventional Weapons
  • Vertical Proliferation of WMD
  • Security and Prestige
  • Horizontal Proliferation of WMD

4
Weapons of Mass Destruction
  • Nuclear (Atomic), Biological, Chemical (ABC)
  • Nuclear
  • Admitted nuclear countries
  • US, UK, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan,
    North Korea
  • Question marks Israel, Iran

5
WMD
  • Biological
  • Disease-causing micro-organisms
  • Diseases (Plague, Smallpox, etc.)
  • Toxins (Anthrax, Salmonella)
  • Chemical
  • Poisons that incapacitate, injure, kill
  • Mustard gas
  • Sarin
  • Biological and Chemical weapons easy to produce,
    but difficult to deliver

6
WMD
  • International Responses
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
  • Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
  • Chemical Weapons Convention
  • Biological Weapons Convention
  • Fear of WMD terrorism

7
Weapons Proliferation
  • International Response re conventional weapons
  • UN Registry of Conventional Arms
  • Ineffective so far

8
Weapons Proliferation
  • Which is the bigger threat Conventional or WMD
    proliferation?

9
Nuclear Weapons The Future?
  • During Cold War, the key was deterrence. In
    post-Cold War era, should we continue to promote
    nuclear weapons for deterrence or even offensive
    purposes?

10
Nuclear Weapons The Future?
  • Arguments against continued use for deterrence
    purposes (eliminationists)
  • Use is morally and politically indefensible
    deterrence incredible
  • Deterrence less necessary since end of Cold War
  • Potential accidental or inadvertent use
  • Possession by one country increases likelihood of
    possession by others

11
Nuclear Weapons The Future?
  • Arguments for continued use for deterrence
    purposes
  • Were in fact moral weapon of choice since kept
    us from conventional conflict.
  • Primary use is deterrence, still necessary
  • Manage and mitigate risks of accidents
  • Getting everyone to give em up is wishful
    thinking
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com