SCHEME FOR PROFESSIONALS IN HIGHER EDUCATION THEME 3: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

SCHEME FOR PROFESSIONALS IN HIGHER EDUCATION THEME 3:

Description:

'an individual's characteristic way of processing information feeling, and ... Ensure all styles are catered for across the learning experience (e.g. course) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: lbrsb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SCHEME FOR PROFESSIONALS IN HIGHER EDUCATION THEME 3:


1
SCHEME FOR PROFESSIONALS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
THEME 3
  • HOW PEOPLE LEARN
  • AND LEARNING THEORIES
  • SESSION 2 TEACHING LEARNING Frameworks and
    Styles

2
  • What do you already know about learning styles?
  • Have you seen the theory used in practice or
    tried to implement it yourself?

3
  • "an individual's characteristic way of processing
    information feeling, and behaving in learning
    situations" (Smith, as cited in Merriam and
    Caffarella, 1991, p. 176).
  • "the cognitive, affective, and physiological
    factors that serve as relatively stable
    indicators of how learners perceive, interact
    with, and respond to the learning environment"
    (Keefe, as cited in Swanson, 1995, p. 2).
  • "the complex manner in which, and conditions
    under which, learners most efficiently and most
    effectively perceive, process, store, and recall
    what they are attempting to learn" (James and
    Gardner, 1995, p. 20).
  • http//www.tss.uoguelph.ca/resources/idres/package
    ls.htmlwhatisls

4
  • 'As a society, we repeatedly confuse styles with
    abilities, resulting in individual differences
    that are really due to styles being viewed as due
    to abilities Many of the students we are
    consigning to the dust heaps of our classrooms
    have the abilities to succeed. It is we, not
    they, who are failing. We are failing to
    recognise the variety of thinking and learning
    styles they bring to the classroom, and teaching
    them in ways that don't fit them well.'
  • (Sternberg, 1997)
  • http//www.teachernet.gov.uk/supplyteachers/detail
    .cfm?vid4cid15sid92ssid4010502opt3

5
THE IDENTIFICATION of LEARNING STYLES
  • Learning style theorists have developed different
    terminology for learning characteristics
  • Broad agreement that any group of learners will
    encompass at least 4 bands of learning styles.
  • There will be some cross over of characteristics,
    but learners will have a dominant preference
  • Learners also bring additional characteristics to
    the learning context existing knowledge,
    personal skills, personal motivations,
    gender,socio-economic status, language

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Howard Gardner
9
Honey and Mumford
http//www.campaign-for-learning.org.uk/aboutyourl
earning/whatlearning.htm
10
KOLB
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Examples of learning styles/advice
  • http//www.learning-styles-online.com/inventory/
  • http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_styles
  • http//www.engsc.ac.uk/er/theory/learningstyles.as
    p
  • http//www.campaign-for-learning.org.uk/aboutyourl
    earning/whatlearning.htm
  • http//www.aboutlearning.com/learning-styles-asses
    sment.htm?gclidCI-xgLr33IcCFUtLMAod7AF0nwSlideFr
    ame_5
  • http//www.ldpride.net/learningstyles.MI.htmWhat
    20are
  • http//www.ldpride.net/learning_style_work.html
  • http//www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/methodolog
    y/learning_style.shtmlone
  • http//www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Secondtie
    r.html

14
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE 1
  • Prediction/identification of potential problems
    students may encounter
  • Adaptation / integration of different teaching
    strategies to provide support
  • Organise time to encompass different learning
    styles
  • Ensure all styles are catered for across the
    learning experience (e.g. course)
  • How does it marry with teaching smarter ?

15
(No Transcript)
16
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE 2
  • Marton (1975) Approaches to study
  • Students approaches to a task (their intention),
    determines the level of engagement thus the
    quality of the outcomes
  • These approaches may be classified as either DEEP
    or SURFACE
  • More recently extended to include STRATEGIC
    LEARNING (Entwistle, 1997)

17
Identifying Teaching Styles
  • Expert (transmitter of information)
  • Formal Authority (sets standards and defines
    acceptable ways of doing things)
  • Personal Models (teaches by illustration and
    direct example)
  • Facilitator (guides and directs by asking
    questions, exploring options, suggesting
    alternatives)
  • Delegator (develops student ability to function
    autonomously)
  • A.F.Grasha, University of Cincinnati

18
Dominant teaching styles?
  • 38 Cluster 1 Expert/ Formal authority
  • 22 Cluster 2 Personal Model/ Expert/ Formal
    authority
  • 17 Cluster 3 Facilitator/ Personal Model/
    Expert
  • 15 Cluster 4 Delegator/Facilitator/Expert
  • http//spahp.creighton.edu/ofda/docs/Teaching20Wi
    th20Style.htm

19
  • Try these two for your teaching style
  • http//members.shaw.ca/mdde615/tchstylsquiz7.htm
  • http//www.longleaf.net/teachingstyle.html
  • Some advice about different ways of teaching
    /learning
  • http//www.sports-media.org/sportapolisnewsletter2
    3newlook.htm
  • http//www.tlc.eku.edu/tips/teaching_styles/

20
How do we perceive ourselves as teachers?
21
(No Transcript)
22
as learners?
23
(No Transcript)
24
PRACTICAL TASKS
  • Use one of the Learning Style inventories to
    identify your own current preferred learning
    style
  • Use one of the Teaching Style inventories to
    identify your own current preferred teaching
    style
  • What were the outcomes of your inventories? Were
    they useful? Accurate?
  • What did you think of the process?
  • What are the implications for you as a teacher?
  • What are the implications for your learners?

25
  • What might the implications be for a learner with
    special needs?
  • What might the implications be for a mature
    student?
  • What might be the implications for students of
    different cultures?

26
Systematic review/critiqueFrank
CoffieldInstitute of EducationUniversity of
LondonDavid MoseleyUniversity of
NewcastleElaine HallUniversity of
NewcastleKathryn EcclestoneUniversity of Exeter
  • 71 different theories of learning style
  • http//www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf

27
  • Few based on real research
  • Very lucrative - 10 to take test on line
  • Very varied
  • Very fragmented
  • Overlap of styles
  • Answers based on mood/context
  • stage of life?
  • Claxton,Guy Elsin conference
  • Elsin Conference
  • EUROPEAN LEARNING STYLES INFORMATION NETWORK
  • http//www.elsinnet.org.uk/abstracts/1999/1ab-99.h
    tm
  • http//www.elsinnet.org.uk/abstracts/2000/1ab-00.h
    tm
  • http//www.elsinnet.org.uk/abstracts/2001/1ab-01.h
    tm

28
  • Each to their own The government espouses the
    theory of learning styles with scant regard to
    the evidence, says Phil Revell Tuesday May 31,
    2005The Guardian "Learning styles" is one of
    the fashionable phrases at the Department for
    Education and Skills. In part, this reflects the
    new emphasis on choice, but underpinning it is
    the theory that everyone has an individual style
    of learning and that working with that style,
    rather than against it, will benefit both pupil
    and teacher. "Through an understanding of
    learning styles, teachers can exploit pupils'
    strengths and build their capacity to learn,"
    says a DfES pamphlet on the subject. The
    anonymous authors go on to say that the theory of
    learning styles is based on "tried and tested
    techniques" and draws on "academic research and
    the experience of practising teachers".

29
  • What the pamphlet fails to mention is the fact
    that the theory is controversial, and that two
    major reports in the past 12 months have attacked
    the research basis for the approach.
  • "The language of learning styles has saturated
    the personalised learning agenda," says Guy
    Claxton, professor of education at Bristol
    University. "That they the DfES should
    recommend the theory so uncritically is, frankly,
    incredible."

30
But discussion of all this can help learning and
teaching
  • In practical terms, the most important thing to
    recognise is that there is evidence for
    significant differences in the way learners
    approach their learning, and that they can all
    benefit from experiencing different approaches to
    learning.
  • http//www.teachernet.gov.uk/supplyteachers/detail
    .cfm?vid4cid15sid92ssid4010502opt3

31
BEYOND LEARNING STYLES? OTHER FACTORS Race,P.
(2005), Making Learning Happen, Chapter 3
  • Wanting to Learn (intrinsic motivation)
  • Needing to Learn (extrinsic motivation)
  • Learning by Doing (practice, trial and error,
    repetition)
  • Learning from feedback
  • Making sense of learning

32
  • Is the individual the key factor anyway?

Impact of immediate learning environment?
physical/social emotional/intellectual? Impact of
wider world? Impact of values? Hidden curriculum?
33
Critique of education systems through visual
images? http//courses.ed.asu.edu/margolis/visua
l_concepts.html
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com