Title: The Marketing of Biotechnology
1The Marketing of Biotechnology Products
Biology 600 Biotechnology Principles and
Products Delivered Live and via
Videoconference June 1-2, 2005
Phil McClean Department of Plant Science North
Dakota State University
2Major Commercially Grown Biotech Crops In US
1994
2000
1997
1995
3Monsanto Worked To Be Seen As Producer Friendly
- Regulatory process requires field testing
- Field testing was performed in the US farm belt
- Monsanto invited farm and community leaders to
field days - Showed the benefits of GMO crops to local
producers - When crops first approved in 1995 producer
familiar - with the new genetics
- Early adoption seen as a result of pro-active
policy of - showing the benefits of the technology
4Marketing Approaches for Biotech Crops
- Identical to conventional except for one trait
- Alleviate fear of something new
- Distinct from other products
- Focus on the uniqueness regardless of technology
- Helps to distinguish the product for export
markets
5Monsantos Promotion of Roundup Ready Corn
- Delivers unsurpassed weed control of both
grasses - and broadleaf weeds.
- Provides proven crop safety and performance with
patented - Roundup WeatherMAX containing TranSorb II
Technology. - Excellent flexibility due to a wide window of
application. - Delivered a 5.5-bushel yield advantage over
conventional - corn herbicide programs
Source http//www.monsanto.com/monsanto/us_ag/lay
out/biotech_traits/rr_corn/default.asp (May 31,
2003)
6Transgenic Crops Increasing In the USa
a Source NASS Planting Reports, 2001, 2002,
2003, 2004
7Promotional Points For Biotechnology Crops
Economic Benefit to Producer Farm Income Society
Benefit to Hungry Planet Farm Production Environm
ental Benefit to Challenged Ecosystem Pesticide
Usage
8Benefits of Biotechnology Crops
Plant Biotechnology Current and Potential
Impact For Improving Pest Management In U.S.
Agriculture An Analysis of 40 Case Studies
http//www.ncfap.org/40CaseStudies.
Source http//www.novakbirch.com/cbi/update06-11-
02/
9Benefits of Biotechnology Crops
Crops Analyzed
- Eight cultivars had a significant impact
- Insect-resistant corn and cotton
- Herbicide-tolerant canola, corn, soybean, and
cotton - Virus-resistant squash and papaya
10Benefits of Biotechnology Crops
Summary for 2001 Grown Crops
Farm Income Impact 1.5 billion increase Food
Production Increase 3.7 billion pounds
increase Production Costs 1.2 billion
decrease Reduced Pesticide 46 million pounds
decrease
11Benefits of Biotechnology Crops
Projected Effect For Other Crops
- Diverse Crops Considered
- Apples, barley, eggplant, lettuce, and wheat
- New Traits for Other Crops
- Corn and cotton
12Benefits of Biotechnology Crops
Project Impact for 2001
Farm Income Impact 260 million increase Food
Production Increase 10.7 billion pounds
increase Production Costs 400 million
decrease Reduced Pesticide 127 million pounds
decrease
13Benefits of Biotechnology Crops
Projected Total Impact for 2001
Farm Income Impact 2.5 billion increase Food
Production Increase 14.5 billion pounds
increase Production Costs 1.6 billion
decrease Reduced Pesticide 163 million pounds
decrease
14Other Features of The Report
- Every state in the US would benefit
- CA would realize 206 million in net value
- ND would realize gt100 million in net value
- Significant pesticide in major crop-producing
states - CA 66 million lb reduction
- New crops would realize benefits
- Raspberry, grape, apple, sunflower, barley and
wheat
15Effects of Adoption of Biotech Crops In North
Dakota
- Corn (Insect and Herbicide Tolerant)
- 24.2 million lb reduction in pesticide use
- Barley (Fungal Resistance Scab)
- 1.4 million lb increase in production
- Sugar Beet (Herbicide Tolerant)
- 953,00 lb increase in pesticide use
16Mandatory Labeling Requirements
Implemented Threshold Level Australia/NZ
1 China None EU
1 Japan 5 Korea
3 Norway 2 Proposed Brazil
4 Saudi Arabia None Taiwan
5 Thailand 3 (corn) 5 (soybeans)
17Types of Labels
- Australia/NZ
- Genetically modified
- Not from a GM source
- May contain a GM food due to supply variation
- Japan
- GM
- Non-GM
- Norway
- Genetically modified X (corn, soybean)
18Problems With Labeling
- Multiple markets
- Identity preservation required
- Not completely feasible
- Elevators are not ready
- IP owners not necessarily interested in this
approach - Lost markets
- 12 billion (through 2001)
19Economic Impact of Biotech Crops Non-industry
View of Bt-Corn
- Profitable in 1996, 1997, 2001
- ex. 2001
- Added value 93 million
- Increased value of harvest 231 million
- Added seed cost 138 million
- Net value 1996-2001
- Net loss 92 million
- Increased value of harvest 567 million
- Added seed cost 659 million
From C.M. Benbrook. 2001. When Does It Pay To
Plant Bt Corn http//www.gefoodalert.org
20Events Important to US/EU Biotechnology Trade
Issues
- 1990 EU approval process implemented
- 1995 US approves first biotech crops
- 1994-1998 EU approves nine biotech crops
- 1996 Mad Cow Disease (BSE) and human
- death linked
- 1997 GMO applications can be submitted to
- a single country, but other countries can
- provide comment labeling becomes an
- option for traits that can be detected
21- 1997-2000 Individual countries override EU
approvals Austria, France, Germany,
Greece, Luxembourg EU doesnt react - 1998 Last biotech crop approved (carnation) 14
in all approved - 1999 Moratorium on new approvals implemented
- 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety adopted by
130 countries - 2000 Liability added as a condition for
approval of new regulations - 2000 Starlink, a corn animal feed GMO, found in
taco shells
22- 2001 New approvals halted until new regulations
are in effect - 2002 Requirement that all products derived from
GMO ingredients be labeled is approved - 2003 US files complaint calling approval
moratorium illegal under WTO policies - 2003 New labeling and traceability regulations
proposed
23Labeling Regulations
- Labeling required for
- GMO seeds
- Raw products (corn meal) derived from GMO seeds
- Refined products (syrup, oil) derived from GMO
seeds (new) - Foods made from raw or refined GMO seeds (new)
- Animal feed derived from GMO seeds (new)
- Allowed contamination (unintended prescence)
level 0.9 - Label
- This product contains genetically modified
organisms. - Or
- The product produced from genetically modified
(name species).
24Traceability Regulations
- All businesses along the route must trace the
product - Grower, storage units, transporters, processes
- Tracing required from farm to fork
- Businesses must keep track from whom they
received - the product and to whom they sold it
- Records must be kept for five years
25Economic Effects of Industry Policy
McDonalds and Egg Production
- McDonalds is the largest purchaser of eggs
- Most eggs are produced in large chicken farms
- Chickens in caged in very crowded conditions
- Conditions generally considered inhumane
- McDonalds is requiring 72 inches per chicken
- Suppliers had to comply by Jan 2003 or lose
contract
26Industry Policy Dictates Product Acceptability
McDonalds and GE Potato
- Largest purchaser of potatoes in the world
- Originally purchased insect resistant GM
potatoes - Changed policy over potential consumer
objections - Monsanto discontinued production of insect
resistant - GM potatoes (NewLeaf Potato)