Alan Garnham Talking Apes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Alan Garnham Talking Apes

Description:

... OF CHIMP LANGUAGE ... Chimps do not invent missing features (function words, ... Chimps never learn the two-way nature of conversation (turn taking) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: biolo86
Category:
Tags: alan | apes | chimp | garnham | talking

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alan Garnham Talking Apes


1
LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT
  • TALKING APES

2
Overview
  • Brief introduction to some of the most famous
    ape language studies
  • Some results from two of the most important
    studies (Sarah, Washoe)
  • General and specific shortcomings of ape language
  • Conclusions

3
Some Famous (non-)Talking Apes and their Trainers
  • Chimps reared as children in families. Trainers
    attempted to teach them spoken language
  • Gua (raised along with human child, Donald)
  • Kellogg and Kellogg (published account, 1933)
  • Produced no recognisable words, maybe understood
    70
  • Vicki
  • Keith and Catherine Hayes (published account,
    1951)
  • Produced four poorly articulated words
  • mama, papa, up, cup
  • Understood more words, including some combinations

4
Some Famous Talking Apes and their Trainers
  • Washoe
  • (Beatrice Allen Gardner Roger Fouts) - ASL
  • Sarah
  • (David Premack) - Plastic Token Language
  • Lana, Sherman, Austin
  • (Duane Rumbaugh Sue Savage-Rumbaugh) - Yerkish
  • Nim Chimpsky
  • (Herb Terrace Laura Petitto) - ASL
  • Koko (Gorilla)
  • (Francine "Penny" Patterson) - ASL
  • Kanzi, Leakey, Imo (Bonobos)
  • (Sue Savage-Rumbaugh Duane Rumbaugh) - symbol
    language like Yerkish

5
Why study Language in Apes?
  • Could provide insights into the nature of
    language
  • Two main studies generated the controversy that
    started in the late 1960s/early 1970s
  • Premack - "Sarah" - operant conditioning, plastic
    symbols
  • Gardners - "Washoe" - taught ASL in a linguistic
    (quasi-home) environment

6
Results - Sarah
  • Learned over 100 symbols
  • Could respond to complex requests
  • Sarah put banana bucket apple pail
  • Could use a symbols meaning not, same,
    different, is the name of, ifthen
  • BUT much better performance with original trainer

7
Results - Washoe
  • Learned about 200 ASL signs
  • Produced strings of signs (but see later)
  • Said to have signed water bird on seeing a duck
  • Could answer some kinds of WH-questions

8
GENERAL SHORTCOMINGS OF CHIMP LANGUAGE
  • Terrace (trainer of Nim Chimpsky) argues that
    chimps cannot learn the
  • conversational
  • semantic
  • syntactic
  • organisation of language.

9
SPECIFIC SHORTCOMINGS OF CHIMP LANGUAGE (Terrace)
  • Chimps rarely initiate language use
  • Most signs are responses to teachers.
  • Chimps almost always imitate their teachers
  • Seem to lack spontaneity of children.
  • Chimps only sign to get reward
  • Usually grab first!!
  • Lots of redundancy, e.g.
  • You me you out me (Washoe)
  • Please milk please me like drink apple bottle
    (Koko)
  • give orange me give eat orange me eat orange
    give me eat orange give me you (Nim)

10
SPECIFIC SHORTCOMINGS OF CHIMP LANGUAGE (Cont.)
  • Not much happens as utterances grow longer.
    Children add new information, chimps don't
  • E.g. Nim's most frequent 2, 3, and 4-word
    utterances
  • play me, me Nim, tickle me
  • play me Nim, eat me Nim, tickle me Nim
  • eat drink eat drink, eat Nim eat Nim
  • Chimps do not invent missing features (function
    words, embedding) as children would invent them
    in a creole
  • Chimps never learn the two-way nature of
    conversation (turn taking). They often interrupt.
  • Chimps confuse form, not meaning - unlike children

11
But...
  • Remember that Terrace came from a behaviorist
    background.
  • Lieberman (1984, chapter 10) presents evidence
    that Terraces views are biased

12
Conclusions
  • It is fairly easy to show that apes can learn to
    use something like human words for communicative
    purposes
  • It is much more difficult to show that they can
    learn other aspects of human language
  • AND REMEMBER it is not clear that children have
    to learn these things at all
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com