PowerPoint Presentation Lecture

1
caucus for the cartography of scientific
controversy 4s easst conference,
paris 900-1030 / 27.08.2004 http//www.ccscgrou
p.org/
bruno latour warren sack (session organizers)
2
agenda

• introductions
• who are you?
• what do you do?
• what outcome would you like from todays meeting?
• business
• task why build a common platform?
• users who would use the common platform? is it
  for research or teaching or both?
• example which scientific controversy might be
  the focus of our work?
• architecture outlines of a common platform
  design
• funding where might we find funding?
• preliminary proposal next generation recommender
  systems

3
people who were invited to todays caucus

• Erika ACEDO
• Michael ARNOLD
• Peter ASARO
• Christophe BONNEUIL
• Jenny-Ann BRODIN
• Juan Miguel CAMPANARIO
• Francis CHATEAURAYNAUD
• Nicholas CHRISMAN
• Henrique Luiz CUKIERMAN
• Ivan DA COSTA MARQUES
• Rickard DANELL
• Jason DELBORNE
• Robin DOWNEY
• Rick DUQUE
• Joseph DUMIT

4
people who were invited to todays caucus

• Ron EGLASH
• Edna EINSIEDEL
• Anita ENGELS
• Michael FLOWER
• Jennifer FRY
• Maja HORST
• Lupicinio INIGUEZ-RUEDA
• Natalie JEREMIJENKO
• Richard KLAMANN
• Andrew KOEHLER
• Bruno LATOUR
• Grit LAUDEL
• Shirley LEITCH
• Loet LEYDESDORFF
• Andrei MOGOUTOV

5
people who were invited to todays caucus

• Juan MUNOZ JUSTICIA
• Neil POLLOCK
• Cristina RODRIGUEZ
• Richard ROGERS
• Tina RUSCHENBURG
• Warren SACK
• Andrea SCHARNHORST
• Pheobe SENGERS
• Xin-Wei SHA
• Benjamin SIMS
• Lindsay SMITH
• Priscilla SONG
• Helen VERRAN
• Peter WEINGART
• Jenene WIEDEMER

6
people who were invited to todays caucus

• K. Brad WRAY
• Stephen ZEHR
• ... and everyone who gave their email address at
  the caucus meeting at the 4S in Atlanta, October
  2003.
• Who have we missed? Who else might be
  interested?
• Please email Warren (wsack_at_ucsc.edu) their
  addresses.
• Or, if youre here today, please leave us your
  email.

7
introductions received

• Warren SACK and Nicolas DUCHENEAUT
• Francis CHATEAURAYNAUD, Didier TORNY and Patrick
  TRABAL
• Nicholas CHRISMAN
• Ron EGLASH and Casey O'DONNELL
• Michael FLOWER
• Hamid EKBIA
• Richard KLAMANN, Andrew KOEHLER and Benjamin SIMS
• Bruno LATOUR
• Loet LEYDESDORFF and Iina HELLSTEN
• Andrei MOGOUTOV
• Richard ROGERS
• Helen VERRAN

8
Warren SACK conversation map
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Nicolas DUCHENEAUT open source browser
15
(No Transcript)
16
Francis CHATEAURAYNAUD, Didier TORNY and Patrick
TRABAL
17
Nicholas CHRISMAN
18
Ron EGLASH and Casey O'DONNELL
19
Michael FLOWER
20
Michael FLOWER and Stephen GANCE
http//www.ccscgroup.org
21
Hamid EKBIA
22
Iian HELLSTEN Loet LEYDESDORFF Monarch
Butterflies in Nature
Number of words 710 In the map 59 Number
of paragraphs 8 Cosine 0.5
23
Iina HELLSTEN Loet LEYDESDORFF Monarch
Butterflies in Greenpeace document
Number of words 442 In the map 38 Number
of paragraphs 7 cosine 0.5
24
Richard KLAMANN, Andrew KOEHLER and Benjamin
SIMSBehavioral Modeling STS in GROMIT, or the
love of representation
25
Bruno LATOUR five diagrams of translation from
Science in Action

• piggybacking I want what you want.
• seduction I want it, why dont you?
• detour Convince them they are cut off.
• reshuffling
• displacing goals
• inventing new goals
• inventing new groups
• drift rendering the detour invisible
• becoming indispensible...i.e., make a machine.

26
translation 1 piggybacking I want what you want
27
translation 2 seduction I want it, why dont
you?
28
translation 3 detourIf you just make a short
detour...
29
translation 4 reshuffling
30
translation 5 become indispensible...make a
machine
31
Andrei MOGOUTOV ReseauLu relational data analysis
32
Andrei MOGOUTOV ReseauLutime-dependent data
analysis
33
Andrei MOGOUTOV ReseauLutextual analysis
34
Richard ROGERS Issue CrawlerIs democracy a
Third World concern? Results of Google News
analysis
35
Helen VERRAN
36
end_of_introductions
37
business

• task why build a common platform?
• users who would use the common platform? is it
  for research or teaching or both?
• example which scientific controversy might be
  the focus of our work?
• architecture outlines of a common platform
  design
• funding where might we find funding?
• preliminary proposal next generation recommender
  systems

38
business

• task why build a common platform?
• users who would use the common platform? is it
  for research or teaching or both?
• example which scientific controversy might be
  the focus of our work?
• architecture outlines of a common platform
  design
• funding where might we find funding?
• preliminary proposal next generation recommender
  systems

39
business

• task why build a common platform?
• users who would use the common platform? is it
  for research or teaching or both?
• example which scientific controversy might be
  the focus of our work?
• architecture outlines of a common platform
  design
• funding where might we find funding?
• preliminary proposal next generation recommender
  systems

40
business

• task why build a common platform?
• users who would use the common platform? is it
  for research or teaching or both?
• example which scientific controversy might be
  the focus of our work?
• architecture outlines of a common platform
  design
• funding where might we find funding?
• preliminary proposal next generation recommender
  systems

41
business

• task why build a common platform?
• users who would use the common platform? is it
  for research or teaching or both?
• example which scientific controversy might be
  the focus of our work?
• architecture outlines of a common platform
  design
• funding where might we find funding?
• preliminary proposal next generation recommender
  systems

42
business

• task why build a common platform?
• users who would use the common platform? is it
  for research or teaching or both?
• example which scientific controversy might be
  the focus of our work?
• architecture outlines of a common platform
  design
• funding where might we find funding?
• preliminary proposal next generation recommender
  systems

43
business

• task why build a common platform?
• users who would use the common platform? is it
  for research or teaching or both?
• example which scientific controversy might be
  the focus of our work?
• architecture outlines of a common platform
  design
• funding where might we find funding?
• preliminary proposal next generation recommender
  systems

44
to be continued...

• ... online, at this weblog
• http//www.ccscgroup.org