Title: Performance and outcome measurement I: Epidemiological and statistical concepts
1Performance and outcome measurement
IEpidemiological and statistical concepts
- 1999 AMCHP skill building session
- Michael A. Stoto, PhD
- The George Washington University
- School of Public Health Health Services
2Outline of presentation
- Measurement theory and methods
- Epidemiological methods
- surveillance and public health assessment
- rates and proportions
- Statistical concepts
- population and measurement variability
- sampling theory and survey methods
- confidence intervals
- Binomial and Normal distributions
- simple regression analysis
- Practical examples
- validity and reliability
- promoting successful birth outcomes
3Measurement theory methods
- Steps for developing measures
- 1. Clarify the purpose of measurement
- 2. Identify the concepts to be measured
- 3. Identify specific indicators of these concepts
- 4. Assess validity, reliability, responsiveness
to change - will discuss this in detail later
41. Clarify the purpose
- Establish accountability for Title V funds
- expenditures
- performance measures
- impact on outcomes
- Improve processes and health outcomes
52. Identify the concepts
- Identify responsibility and accountability for
performance - Evidence-based link between performance and
health - Balance between short- and long-range goals
- Balance among levels and types of service
6Levels and types of service
73. Identify specific indicators
- Timely availability of data at a reasonable cost
- Explicit definitions
- Inclusion in other indicator sets
8Concepts vs. indicators
- Concept
- mortality
- presence of disease
- health risks
- costs
- quality
- access
- Operational form
- disease specific mortality rate
- disease prevalence rate
- risk factor prevalence rate
- treatment costs per patient
- patient satisfaction ratings
- percent of population with health insurance
9Concepts vs. indicators(capacity measures)
- SSI with CSHCN
- Percent of state SSI beneficiaries lt 16 years old
receiving services from the state Children with
Special Health Care Needs program - Medical home
- Percent of CSHCN who have a medical/health home
10Concepts vs. indicators(process measures)
- Medicaid children
- Percent of potentially Medicaid eligible children
who have received a service paid by the Medicaid
program - Lead screening
- Proportion of children aged 6 mo. to 5 years
screened for excess blood lead
11 Concepts vs. indicators(outputs, intermediate
outcomes)
- Prenatal care
- Percent of infants born to pregnant women
receiving prenatal care beginning in the first
trimester - Newborn screening
- Percent of newborns with at least one screening
for each of PKU, hypothyroidism, galactosemia,
hemoglobinopathies - Vaccine coverage
- Percent of children though age 2 who have
completed MMR, DPT, polio, Hib, and hepatitis B
immunizations
12Concepts vs. indicators(health outcomes)
- Infant mortality
- Number of infant deaths (lt 1 year) divided by
number of live births (per 1,000) - Low birth weight
- Percent of live births lt 1500 grams at birth
- Teen pregnancy
- Birth rate (per 1,000) for teenagers aged 15
through 17 years - School success
- Average reading scale scores of 9 year olds
13Sources of data for performance measurement
- Vital statistics
- maternal and infant mortality
- birth certificate information
- birth/death match
- Examples
- prenatal care
- low birthweight births
- low birthweight children born at level iii
facilities - teenage fertility rate
- motor vehicle crash deaths
- suicide deaths among youths
14Birth certificate information
- Location information
- state, county, and place of residence
- place of birth and attendance
- Infant information
- race, sex, gestation, birthweight, Apgar
- Mother age, race/Hispanic, education, marital
status - Father age, race/Hispanic
- Prenatal care month began, number of visits
- Medical/health data
- tobacco alcohol use, weight gain during pregnancy
- medical risks, complications of labor
15Sources of data for performance measurement
- Surveillance data
- Special purpose surveys
- Examples
- immunization coverage
- dental sealants
- breastfeeding at hospital discharge
- hearing screening before hospital discharge
- children with health insurance
16Sources of data for performance measurement
- Program data
- Title V, other MCH, other programs
- Examples
- CSHCN with
- medical/health home
- insurance for primary and specialty care
- Medicaid services to Medicaid eligible
- Newborn screening
17Epidemiological methods
- Surveillance and public health assessment
- data sources
- Mortality and morbidity analyses
- rates and proportions
18Surveillance
- Purposes
- identification of emerging health problems
- identification of affected individuals
- continued watchfulness over disease in the
population - Types of surveillance
- active
- passive
- sentinel health events
19Surveillance data sources
- Vital statistics (mortality and fertility)
- Disease control programs
- case reporting/surveillance systems
- case finding for selected populations
- Administrative data
- employers and schools
- absenteeism, periodic physical exams
- health plans, hospitals, pharmacies
- administrative data
- provider and patient surveys
20Surveillance data sources
- Prevalence surveys
- Purpose to provide information on the frequency
of disease in a population - Types of cross-sectional surveys
- Interview National Health Interview Survey
(NHIS) - Examination National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (NHANES) - Health records National Hospital Discharge Survey
21Public health assessment
- Definition
- The regular collection, analysis,
interpretation, and communication of information
about health conditions, risks, and assets in a
community (IOM, 1988) - Other assessment data
- census and general population surveys
- administrative data from health sector
- also social services, housing, education,
transportation, etc.
22Epidemiologic analyses
- Time e.g. seasonality
- Place spot and area maps
- Time and space clusters
- Person
- age, gender
- race and ethnicity
- genetic background
- social class and SES
23Mortality analyses
- Mortality rates
- defined population group -- denominator
- time period
- number of deaths -- numerator
- in that population during that time period
- Crude death rate -- all ages and causes
- Age- and sex-specific death rates
- restrict numerator and denominator
- Cause-specific death rates
- restrict numerator
24Mortality analyses
- Age adjustment
- direct
- indirect
- Survival/life table measures
- life expectancy
- Other mortality measures
- case fatality rate
- proportionate mortality rate/ratio (PMR)
25Measures of disease frequency
- Incidence rate
- of new cases in a specified time period
- of persons at risk of developing the disease
- Prevalence rate
- of cases present in a specified time period
- of persons at risk of having the disease
- Point prevalence number of cases at a specified
moment - Period prevalence number of cases that occur
during a specified period
26Measures of disease frequency
- Proportion ratio with
- denominator of individuals in group
- numerator of these with specified
characteristics - Rates that are really proportions
- attack rate proportion of individuals in some
group that get a specified disease - case fatality rate proportion of individuals
with a specified disease who die of that disease
27Statistical concepts
- Unit of analysis
- Level of measurement
- Population and measurement variability
- Binomial and Normal distributions
- Confidence intervals
- Sampling theory and survey methods
28Unit of analysis
- Individual
- Defined population
- nation, county, community, program
participants, insured population, etc. - Institution
- hospital, health plan, clinic, provider group,
WIC program, etc.
29Level of measurement
- Nominal
- categories without order
- Ordinal
- categories with order
- Interval
- continuous without natural zero
- Ratio
- continuous with natural zero
30Population (subject) variability and measurement
error
- Subject variability Measurement error
- Outside temperature
- Daily variation Thermometer error
- Body temperature
- Interpersonal variation Thermometer error
- Body weight
- Interpersonal variation Scale error
- Self-reporting error
31Normal/Gaussian distribution
- Many continuous variables are approximately
Normally distributed - but not all!
- subject variability and measurement error
- Normal distributions can be fully characterized
by mean (?) and standard deviation (?) - variance (?2) (standard deviation) 2
32Normal/Gaussian distribution
- In a Normal distribution
- about 2/3 of subjects are within 1 ? of ?
- about 95 of subjects are within 2 ? of ?
33Normal/Gaussian distribution
- Example Distribution of birthweight (X)
- ? 4000 g, ? 1000 g
- What is probability that X gt 5000g?
- Z (X - ?)/ ? (5000 - 4000)/1000 1
- Prob(Zgt1) 1/2 1/3 1/6
- What is probability that X lt 2000g?
- Z (X - ?)/ ? (2000 - 4000)/1000 -2
- Prob(Zgt-2) 1/2 0.05 0.025
34Sampling theory
- Simple random sample
- each element in population has same, and
independent, chance of being in a sample - Sample average ?xi / n
- Central limit theorem
- has a normal distribution with
- mean ? and standard deviation ? / ?n
35Sampling theory
?
36Sampling theory
- Sample size n 1, 10, and 100
?
37Sampling theory
- Example Average birthweight ( )
- standard deviation of ? / ?n
- n ?n ? / ?n
- 1 1 1000/1 1000
- 10 3.16 1000/3.16 316
- 100 10 1000/10 100
38Confidence intervals
- Basic idea
- is in the interval ? 1.96 ?/?n in 95 of
samples - 1.96 ?/?n covers ? 95 of the time, and
is called a 95 confidence interval - must use a t-value greater than 1.96 when ? is
estimated from the data - e.g. t 2.6 when n 5
39Confidence intervals
- Example Average birthweight ( )
- Sample values 3000, 5500, 2500, 4600
- 15,600/4 3900
- ?/?n 1000 / ?4 500
- 95 Confidence interval (n 4)
- 1.96 ?/?n 3900 1.96(500)
- 3900 980 (2920, 4880)
- 95 Confidence interval (if n 25, 3900)
- 1.96 ?/?n 3900 1.96(1000)/ ?25
- 3900 392 (3508, 4292)
40Statistics for proportions
- Many performance measures are in the form of
proportions, i.e. a ratio with - of individuals with specified characteristics
- p
- of individuals in group
- Counts have a Binomial distribution if
- fixed n of binary outcomes
- independent outcomes with same probability ?
- As n increases, distribution of p is
approximately Normal with - ? n? and ? ?(1-?)/n
41Statistics for proportions
- Example standard deviation of p
?
n
42Statistics for proportions
43Statistics for proportions
44Regression analysis
- What is the relationship between Y and X?
- If a straight line, can be expressed as Y a
bX - What is the slope, i.e. the increase in Y for a
unit increase in X? - Is the slope significantly different than 0?
- Since Y and Y are never exactly linear, use
- Y a bX e, where e has a Gaussian
distribution with ? 0, and e are independent - Choose a and b to minimize squared deviations
?(y - a - bx)2
45Regression analysis
46Regression analysis
47Regression analysis
- Example IMR trend analysis
48Regression analysis
- Example IMR trend analysis
49Practical examples
- Assessing proposed measures
- Validity and reliability tradeoffs
- Differentials and disparities
- Successful birth outcomes
504. Assess the proposed measures
- Validity
- is the indicator measuring the right concept?
- Reliability
- is the indicator consistently measuring the
concept? - Is measurement error small compared to population
variability? - Robustness and responsiveness to change
- will the indicator change if and only if the
concept being measured changes?
51Reliability and validity
Reliable
Valid
Reliable and valid
52Increasing reliability
- Reduce error variance
- increase number of observers
- increase number of observations
- observer training
- improve scales
- Enhance true variance
- improve scales
53Reliability and validity
- Performance measures are not the same as practice
recommendations - example prenatal care in first trimester rather
than by PHS recommendations - trade validity for availability
54Reliability and validity
- Use running averages and statistical smoothing
- example average infant mortality rate over 3 or
5 years - trade timeliness for reliability
55Reliability and validity
- Use proxy measures that reflect trends and
differences - example low birth weight rather than infant
mortality - trade validity for reliability
56Differentials and disparities
- Increasing national concern about racial, ethnic
and other differentials in health outcomes - Healthy People 2010 focus on eliminating
disparities - Use parallel indicators for different groups (not
disparity measures) - Use appropriate independent variables to
understand problem and solutions
57Promoting successful birth outcomes
- Example based on Access to Health Care in America
(IOM, 1993) - One of five objectives Promoting successful
birth outcomes - Combination of 4 utilization and outcome
indicators
58Promoting successful birth outcomes
- Indicator 1 (utilization measure)
- Percentage of pregnant women obtaining adequate
prenatal care - Strength direct measure of access
- Weaknesses
- Measured by initiation and frequency
- neither alone sufficiently measures adequacy
- nothing on distribution of visits, content,
continuity - large number could represent a problem
- more complex indices can be confounded by missing
or incomplete data - recall problems
59Promoting successful birth outcomes
- Indicator 2 (outcome measure)
- Infant mortality rate
- Strengths
- commonly used measure of access
- available everywhere from vital statistics
- Weaknesses
- provides little information about access barriers
- rate includes causes of death that cannot be
affected by the health care system - high variability in infant deaths in some areas
60Promoting successful birth outcomes
- Indicator 3 (outcome measure)
- Low birthweight rate
- proportion of infants weighing less than 2500 g
- Specific to adequate prenatal care and access to
nutrition services - Strengths
- important predictor of infant survival
- numerator not as rare, so more stable
- Weakness
- timeliness of published data
61Promoting successful birth outcomes
- Indicator 4 (outcome measure)
- Congenital syphilis rate
- Strength
- reportable condition in most states
- very specific to lack of or inadequate prenatal
care - Weaknesses
- reporting may be incomplete
- syphilis is rare in most states
62Conclusions
- Performance measurement can be an effective tool
for accountability and learning organizations - Depends on availability of valid and reliable
indicators - Need a limited yet comprehensive set of coherent
and significant indicators - which can be monitored over time and
- disaggregated to relevant social units
63References
- IOM/NAS reports (www.nap.edu)
- Also www2.nas.edu/hpdp and www2.nas.edu/bocyf
- Improving Health in the Community (1997)
- Access to Health Care in America (1993)
- America's Children Health Insurance and Access
to Care (1998) - Systems of Accountability Implementing
Children's Health Insurance Programs (1998) - Paying Attention to Children in a Changing Health
Care System (1996)
64References
- Additional IOM/NAS reports
- Reducing the Odds Preventing Perinatal
Transmission of HIV in the United States (1999) - From Generation to Generation The Health and
Well-Being of Children in Immigrant Families
(1998) - The Best Intentions Unintended Pregnancy and the
Well-being of Children and Families (1995) - Overcoming Barriers to Immunization (1994)
- Prenatal Care (1988)
- Preventing Low Birthweight (1985)