Title: Some Proposals for ILC Beam Test Facilities at FNAL
1Some Proposals for ILC Beam Test Facilities at
FNAL
- Mike Church
- ILC RD Meeting
- 4/19/06
2Where Did This Come From? -- Agenda and Attendees
for Initial Discussions on Beam Facilities
3/14/06
35 Tiered Proposals
4Beam Test Facilities and What Can Be Learned from
Them
5Flat Beams from Photoinjector
6ILCTA _at_ New Muon Lab
round to flat beam transformation
(will be 3)
P. Piot
7Emittance Evolution in the ILC Main Linac
- Lattice is BCD with 1 Quadrupole per 4 Cryo
Modules. Length of a FODO cell is 86 m. Number of
cells is 114 - Initial Beam Energy is 15 GeV, final 250 GeV
- Initial Vertical Normalized Emittance is 20
nmrad - The plot shows that large emittance growth occurs
in the first 10 FODO cells (1 km length), even
with all steering algorithms applied (both 1-1
steering and Dispersion Free steering applied).
Projected vertical emittance, using MATLIAR
A. Valishev
8Emittance Evolution in a Model Test Facility Linac
Projected vertical emittance, using MATLIAR
- Simple model of a Test Linac 10 FODO cells of
ILC (1 km) - Initial Beam Energy is 100 MeV, final energy 23
GeV - Initial Vertical Normalized Emittance is 20
nmrad - With nominal element misalignments and no
steering applied the emittance growth of 2 orders
of magnitude is observed
A. Valishev
9Civil Construction Issues (5 GeV linac)
- A 5 GeV linac should duplicate as much of the ILC
infrastructure as possible - 2 tunnel design
- identical RF and cryo distribution systems
- 1 cryoplant/service building
- large access shaft plus emergency egress paths
- vertical curvature
10Possible Location of 500m Linac Inside Tevatron
Ring
500m linac
C0 collision hall
approximate site of PD
11A Survey of e- Rings
2 new DR proposals in progress - HERA
competing with XFEL - CESRTF conversion
starting in 2008 1.5 5.5 GeV e and e- low
emittance (3nm) up to .36A(??) competing with
CHESS
12Cross Section of HERA Magnet in Tevatron Tunnel
13HERA Tunnel and Magnets
14Possible Scheme for Positron Production and
Acceleration
- Conventional positron target
- Return beamline to front end of linac
- Two options for acceleration
- Accelerate positron bunches between electron
bunches spaced at 308 nsec - Use widely spaced bunches so that interleaved
positrons/electrons is not an issue - The point is to fill the positron ring for beam
stability/emittance studies - Two options for DR configuration
- Reverse polarity of magnets and circulate
positrons in same direction as electrons - Keep polarity the same and have duplicate
feedback, collimators, masks, aborts, etc
15This is a Work in Progress with Many Questions
Unanswered
- Could any of these facilities be (or evolve to)
the final thing? - Should any of these facilities by deep
underground? Differences in ground motion,
temperature/humidity control, etc? - Can (an upgraded) photoinjector satisfy
emittance, intensity, and pulse train length
requirements for linac and DR tests? - cost? timeline?
- Can competing facilities do better? (CESRTF and
HERA DR) - Can any of these facilities have dual use --
ie, besides ILC beam physics/technology? -