Modocop in the OASIS project: Active Objects, Semantics, Internet and Security INRIA in SophiaAntipo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Modocop in the OASIS project: Active Objects, Semantics, Internet and Security INRIA in SophiaAntipo

Description:

Proofs of safety properties of distributed Java applications ... Dining Philosophers : Rewritten in ProActive, distributed style. Finite configuration ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Mart556
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modocop in the OASIS project: Active Objects, Semantics, Internet and Security INRIA in SophiaAntipo


1
Modocop in the OASIS project Active Objects,
Semantics, Internet and SecurityINRIA in
Sophia-Antipolishttp//www.inria.fr/oasis
  • Overview of the OASIS research
  • Proofs of safety properties of distributed Java
    applications
  • Platform for static analysis and verification of
    distributed Java

Eric Madelaine, 13-02-2002
2
Oasis at a glance
Semantics and proofs Static analysis / Model
Checking Java/XML Environment
Environments
Specifications
concurrence /distribution security
Objects
Distributed
3
Sun Microsystems
Parallel, Distributed, Concurrent,
Mobile programming
  • Transparent distribution, remote object creation
  • Method call -gt asynchronous communication
  • Futures wait-by-necessity
  • Mobility Migration of active objects
  • XML descriptors for deployment

4
C3D distributed-//-collaborative
5
Ongoing Work
  • Secure and efficient meta-computing
  • Security at application level (appli. VPN)
  • Group communication
  • Formal definition of the ProActive model
  • ASP object model a la Abadi-Cardelli
  • Equivalence proofs between Sequential and
    Parallel programs
  • Deterministic subset of the model
  • Behavioural semantics, and relation with the
    object model
  • Property verification via model-checking

6
Microsoft W3C
A component generator for domain-specific
languages object-oriented XML-centric
  • Openness conform to W3C standards (DTD,
    Schemas)
  • Reuse an homogeneous approach (exportable GUI)
  • Integration component-based architecture
  • Adaptability visitor design patterns AOP
  • Environments for Java ( Javacard), Bytecode.

7
(No Transcript)
8
Modocop in the OASIS project
  • Overview of the OASIS research
  • Proofs of safety properties of distributed Java
    applications
  • Platform for static analysis and verification of
    distributed Java

9
Proofs of safety properties of concurrent/distribu
ted Java applications
  • Context
  • Multi-threaded Java
  • JCSP (processes channels a la CSP)
  • ProActive (asynchronous messages, creation and
    migration of active objects)
  • Specific frameworks AAA, Voyager, Aglets, ...
  • Criteria
  • High level primitives for distribution/commun
    ication, formal semantics
  • Distributed implementation
  • ProActive

10
ProActive behavioural semantics
  • Active objects processes, parameterised, with
    dynamic creation.
  • Distant method calls asynchronous messages,
    stored in request queues.
  • Object behaviour each active object controls
    the activation of the requests in its queue.
  • Return values asynchronous messages, wait by
    necessity.
  • Migration is transparent.

11
ProActive finite models
  • Pragmatics
  • Model checkers deal with finite representations.
  • Hierarchical networks of finite transition
    systems (all analysis functions ought to be
    compositional).
  • Abstract and approximate finite structures (as in
    CADP or Bandera).
  • Finite representation of request queues.

12
ProActive academic example
  • (work done with Rabea Boulifa)
  • Dining Philosophers
  • Rewritten in ProActive, distributed style
  • Finite configuration
  • Proof of (absence of) deadlock
  • Proof of boundness of requests queues
  • Proof of liveness

13
ProActive academic example
  • (pictures)

14
Proactive a bigger example
  • (work with Tomas Barros)
  • Electronic tax services in Chile
  • Specification, and reference implementation in
    ProActive
  • Finite instantiation already too big for brute
    force reachability analysis
  • Properties (of specification)
  • deadlock analysis, partial specifications
    (scenarios)
  • Properties (of ref. implementation)
  • equivalence with the corresponding component in
    the specification

15
Modocop in the OASIS project
  • Overview of the OASIS research
  • Proofs of safety properties of distributed Java
    applications
  • Platform for static analysis and verification of
    distributed Java

16
Platform for verification
  • Static analysis, verification and model-checking
    of Java and ProActive applications (source or
    bytecode)
  • Generic tools reusable for other OO languages
  • Modular external tools connected through
    standard formats or APIs, various functions
    combined for an application
  • Practical source level diagnoses

17
Platform for verification
  • Schema

18
Conclusion
  • Work in Modocop
  • Analysis platform for Java and ProActive (with
    Lande)
  • Behavioural semantics (R. Boulifa)
  • Connection with external verification tools and
    model-checker (E. Madelaine stage DEA)
  • Realistic case study
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com