CostBenefit Analysis on Health Effects of Contraceptive Methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

CostBenefit Analysis on Health Effects of Contraceptive Methods

Description:

What are the net health effects and subsequent costs resulting from using ... method(s) continuously = benefits & cost savings overestimated in the report. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: KatyL8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CostBenefit Analysis on Health Effects of Contraceptive Methods


1
Cost-Benefit Analysis on Health Effects of
Contraceptive Methods
  • Elizabeth ONeill, ECON 539, 4.25.07

2
  • Central Questions
  • What are the net health effects and subsequent
    costs resulting from using various methods of
    contraception as compared to not using
    contraception?
  • What are the policy recommendations based on the
    results?
  • Reference
  • Sonnenberg, R., Burkman, R., Hagerty, G.,
    Speroff, L., Speroff, T. (2004) Costs and Net
    Health Effects of Contraceptive Methods.
    Contraception. 69 447-459.

3
Methods
Data source 1995 National Survey of Family
Growth monitoring a 2 yr. period. Sample Women
15-50 y.o. who are not attempting to become
pregnant during the duration of the study.
Causal statement Thirteen methods of
contraception affect various health factors
including cancer, cardiovascular, infections and
pregnancy but are more effective and less costly
than not using a contraceptive.
4
Units of Analysis
Costs were a total amount (not disaggregated by
private, public or insured costs). Contraceptive
methods were expressed in terms of saved
quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). QALYs are
calculated by multiplying each increment of
survival by the utility of the increment. Model
assumes women will use same method(s)
continuously benefits cost savings
overestimated in the report.
5
(No Transcript)
6
Cost-Benefit Analysis Factors
  • Cost (US )
  • Marginal cost (US )
  • Quality-adjusted life-years
  • Marginal quality-adjusted life-years
  • Cost savings vs. number of methods
  • Pregnancies avoided per woman vs. of methods
  • QALY gains vs. methods

7
Summary of Results
8
Detailed Cost-Utility Results
  • Least expensive method varies for different
    time periods
  • Within 1 year DMPA (3-month injectable) is the
    least costly (5,103 savings)
  • Within 2 years Vasectomy is the least costly
    (17,300 saved over a 5-year period)
  • Any contraceptive method used provided
    substantial healthcare savings and an increase in
    QALYs.
  • Methods that require user intervention less
    often than daily are the least costly and most
    effective (Sonnenberg et al, 2004).

9
Policy Implications
  • Managed care organizations/health plans should
    consider providing some contraceptive services as
    a cost saving measure.
  • Promote DMPA for short-term pregnancy prevention
    and vasectomies for longer-term prevention
    through physician and patient education.
  • Further studies needed to determine
    public/private payment effects on the findings.
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com