Title: Sustainable harvest of Finnish moose population
1Sustainable harvest ofFinnish moose population?
- Esa Ranta, Anne Luoma, Veijo Kaitala
-
- FGFRI
2Contents
- Basic information on Finnish moose population and
harvest
3Contents
- Basic information on Finnish moose population and
harvest - Stochastic IBM model
4Contents
- Basic information on Finnish moose population and
harvest - Stochastic IBM model
- Four questions
5Contents
- Basic information on Finnish moose population and
harvest - Stochastic IBM model
- Four questions
- Four answers
6Moose (Alces alces)
7(No Transcript)
8Moose population in Finland
- Population size estimates
- Hunter observations (during the hunting season)
- their estimate of post-harvest pop.size
- Wildlife triangle (snow track census)
- Aerial surveys
- 20-50 of population is killed annually.
- Age structure of population is controlled.
- Reproduction rate is high (mostly due to high
harvest rate of young animals)
9100 000
Winter population
80 000
Harvest
60 000
Number of moose
40 000
20 000
0
2000
1930
1950
1970
1990
The moose population and the annual harvest in
Finland 1930 - 2000.
10Killed animals (ind/100km2)
11Modelling moose population dynamics
- with individual based,
- stochastic model
Annual reproduction rate 0.9 calves/ a
female Non-hunting mortality 5 of winter
population Hunting mortality (hunting rate) 15
- 25 of the harvestable population
12(No Transcript)
13Question 1
- Given the current population status
- What is the risk of moose population decline?(10
year time-window)
14Probability of population decline
Hunting rate of females
15Answer 1
- The risk of moose population decline increases
substantially when annual harvest fraction
inceseses from 15 of the harvestable population
size(10 year time-window)
16(No Transcript)
17Question 2
- Given the current population status, with errors
in population estimates - The wish is to reduce current population to a
much lower lewel - What will happen?(10 year time-window)
18There are reasons to limit the population
size. But if we want to get the pop. size really
low, It is important to know What if.. - the
population size is overestimated or
underestimated? - estimations tend to be
biased? How crucial effects do inaccurate
estimates have on moose population?
19- Real Estimated
- Population size in winter
- 10 000 8 000 - 12 000
- Targeted population size 5 000
- Population size in autumn
- According to model 1.5 winter pop.
- (realistic and productive populations)
- 10 000 - winter 12 000 - 18 000
- mortality birth
- Hunting (h) h Estimated pop. size - 5 000
animals - Left
- pop. in autumn - h ? estim.pop. - h 5 000
20Different types of estimation errors
21 Realistic population structure
Population sizes after hunting
22Realistic population structure
Cumulative sum
Population size after hunting
23Answer 2
- With uncertain population estimates reduction of
curent population size to a lower targeted size
will yield to population sizes that are much
lower than the target (10 year time-window)
24(No Transcript)
25Mooses come walking over the hillMooses come
walking, they rarely stand stillWhen mooses come
walking they go where they willWhen mooses come
walking over the hill- Arlo Guthrie
26Question 3
- How does landscape structure influence risk of
moose population decline due to harvesting?
27Moose populatin in landscape
28Moose population in landscape
Dispersal success
Risk of population decline
29Answer 3
- Under many different dispersal scenarios risk of
population decline is the highest in the corner
units, then come the border units - The risk is the lowest in the central units
30(No Transcript)
31Question 4
- What is the hunting strategy yielding the highest
harvest with a given targeted population size?
32Moose harvest in Finland
Harvest, ind. 10 km-2
Winter herd, ind. 10 km-2
33Harvest scenarios
Harvest
Winter herd size
34 Maximum harvest, target 4 ind. km-2
Intercept
Slope
Total harvest, ind. km-2
35Answer 4
Harvest
Winter herd size
36Conclusions
- The simple IBM model on moose population renewal
has served us well in answering a few basic
questions on the future of moose and moose
harvesting in Finland
37Conclusions
- The model does not rely upon very complex
assumptions (births, deaths, sex, harvesting),
yet we believe it captures the essence of moose
life
38Conclusions
- The model prompts where more information is
needed - dispersal, population estimates, harvest
management - Some of the answers would not necessarily have
called for an IBM model