CryoSat Mission Preparation: A Cost Savings and Quality Improvement Case Study

presentation player overlay
1 / 18
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CryoSat Mission Preparation: A Cost Savings and Quality Improvement Case Study


1
CryoSat Mission Preparation A Cost Savings and
Quality Improvement Case Study
  • Jim Cater
  • Klaus Dieter Mau
  • Nic Mardle
  • David Quigley

2
CryoSat Mission
  • Mission objectives - Ice altimetry with high
    spatial resolution for
  • Ice Sheet Interiors (Conventional LRM Mode)
  • Sea Ice (High Resolution SAR Mode)
  • Ice Sheet Margins (High Res. SARInMode)
  • Overall Ice Sheets (LRM and SARInMode)

3
CryoSat Instrument Layout
4
CryoSat Mission Complexity
  • The CryoSat spacecraft database consists of
    approximately
  • 7,000 telemetry parameters and
  • 1,700 commands
  • The Flight Operations Manual contains over 450
    individual procedures

5
MOIS Background
  • MOIS provides an integrated suite of tools for
    procedure
  • Design development
  • Validation
  • Execution
  • Maintenance
  • MOIS generates
  • Manuals
  • Procedures
  • Languages
  • Reports
  • Real-time procedure scheduling and automation
    engine

6
Procedure Development
  • Procedure flow designed graphically using the
    MOIS Flowcharter.
  • Logic constructs include
  • If
  • Repeat-Until
  • While
  • Case
  • Wait

7
Procedure Development (cont.)
  • Procedure details guided by spacecraft data
  • Telemetry and commands selected from DB
  • Calibration and limit data provided to developer
  • Procedure calls selected from Library
  • Enforced variable type usage

8
EADS-Astrium Configuration
9
MOIS Execution Environment
10
SCOS-2000 Execution Environment
11
Scope of MOIS Usage
Hot Spots 2 Unfocused effort on coding and
validation of Operations and Test Sequences 4
Delivery of Flight Operations Manual 5
Procedures tend to be control system dependent 6
Inefficiencies due to incompatibility of
systems 7 Black boxes become black holes
12
Hot Spot 2
  • MOIS minimised control system coding and
    validation
  • EADS-Astrium developed and validated procedures
    within MOIS
  • ESOC generated SCOS-2000 command sequences
    directly from MOIS procedures
  • Minor repackaging and modifications required for
    SCOS-2000 specific operations

13
Hot Spot 3
  • MOIS reduced formal delivery overhead and
    complexity
  • FOM generated directly from MOIS Procedures,
    which had been validated using the EADS-Astrium
    EGSE and MOIS Validator
  • 20 full and partial deliveries of FOM data during
    development life-cycle
  • SVT-0 had zero procedural issues

14
Hot Spot 4
  • Although the MOIS database was not used as the
    transfer mechanism
  • The MOIS procedures were developed,
    consistency-checked and validated using a
    SCOS-2000 compliant DB
  • EADS-Astrium delivered this DB with the FOM
  • Base DB enhanced with ESOC specific data
  • Number of DB issues greatly reduced

15
Hot Spot 5
  • MOIS demonstrated the potential for abstracting
    satellite control procedures from the underlying
    system
  • CGS language scripts not used
  • Minimal changes needed for SCOS-2000 less than
    5 of sequences caused problems
  • Engineers concentrate on enhancing operations
    rather than transcribing data

16
Hot Spots 6 7
  • Interface documentation was minimised
  • No multi-level format definitions
  • Procedure Rules and Guidelines (How-to)
  • Ops management had tools to provide objective
    evidence of
  • Development status
  • Validation status
  • Delivery status

17
CryoSat-2
  • Potential for further efficiencies
  • Easy identification of procedural impacts due to
    variations between the two satellites.
  • Improved process for new procedures
  • Enhanced set of development guidelines
  • Potential use of MOIS execution environment at
    ESOC
  • Potential use of MOIS by EADS-Astrium AIV
  • Paper AIAA-2006-5710 Smart- 1 Ground Operations
    Automation Session 31 Wednesday.

18
Conclusions
  • Efficient and effective flight procedure
    development and maintenance.
  • Efficient and effective testing of flight
    procedures when MOIS execution environment is
    used.
  • Greater consistency between procedures and
    telemetry and telecommand definitions.
  • Minimal conversion of procedural data required
    for different control systems.
  • Efficient and effective re-use of operations
    knowledge between similar satellites.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com