Reliability Life Cycle Cost Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Reliability Life Cycle Cost Analysis

Description:

Option 1 (current): coal mined, sent by train to Texas, burned there. Option 2: coal mined, burned in Wyoming into electricity, sent via transmission line to Texas ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:374
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: hscottma
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reliability Life Cycle Cost Analysis


1
Reliability / Life Cycle Cost Analysis
  • H. Scott Matthews
  • February 17, 2004

2
Recap of Last Lecture
  • Why performance measurement is difficult
  • Data availability, lack of common language for
    metrics and use
  • Overview of performance metrics at the global
    scale
  • Intro to reliability

3
Examples (No User Costs)
  • Project B
  • Construction 350k
  • Prevent. Maint. _at_ Yr 8 40k
  • Major Rehab _at_ Yr 15 300k
  • Prevent. Maint. _at_ Yr 20 40k
  • Prevent. Maint. _at_ Yr 25 60k
  • Salvage_at_ 30 105k
  • NPV 610k
  • Project A
  • Construction 500k
  • Prevent. Maint. _at_ Yr 15 40k
  • Major Rehab _at_ Yr 20 300k
  • Salvage_at_ 30 150k
  • NPV 705k

4
An Energy Example
  • Could consider life cycle costs of people using
    electricity in Texas
  • Assume coal-fired power plants used
  • Coal comes from Wyoming
  • Option 1 (current) coal mined, sent by train to
    Texas, burned there
  • Option 2 coal mined, burned in Wyoming into
    electricity, sent via transmission line to Texas
  • Which might be cheaper in cost? What are
    components of cost that may be relevant? Are
    there other user costs?

5
Reliability-Based Management
  • From Frangopol (2001) paper
  • Funds are scarce, need a better way
  • Have been focused on condition-based
  • Unclear which method might be cheaper
  • Bridge failure led to condition assessment/NBI
    methods
  • Which emphasized need for 4Rs
  • Eventually money got more scarce
  • Bridge Management Systems (BMS) born
  • PONTIS, BRIDGIT, etc.
  • Use deterioration and performance as inputs into
    economic efficiency measures

6
BMS Features
  • Elements characterized by discrete condition
    states noting deterioration
  • Markov model predicts probability of state
    transitions (e.g. good-bad-poor)
  • Deterioration is a single step function
  • Transition probabilities not time variant

7
Reliability Assessment
  • Decisions are made with uncertainty
  • Should be part of the decision model
  • Uses consideration of states, distribution
    functions, Monte Carlo simulation to track
    life-cycle safety and reliability for
    infrastructure projects
  • Reliability index b use to measure safety
  • Excellent State 5, b gt 9, etc.
  • No guarantee that new bridge in State 5!
  • In absence of maintenance, just a linear,
    decreasing function (see Fig 1)

8
Reliability (cont.)
  • Not only is maintenance effect added, but
    random/state/transitional variables are all given
    probability distribution functions, e.g.
  • Initial performance, time to damage,
    deterioration rate w/o maintenance, time of first
    rehab, improvement due to maint, subsequent
    times, etc..
  • Used Monte Carlo simulation, existing bridge data
    to estimate effects
  • Reliability-based method could have significant
    effect on LCC (savings) Why?

9
Condition State Transitions and Deterioration
Models
10
Linear Regression (in 1 slide)
  • Arguably simplest of statistical models, have
    various data and want to fit an equation to it
  • Y (dependent variable)
  • X vector of independent variables
  • b vector of coefficients
  • e error term
  • Y BX e
  • Use R-squared, related metrics to test model and
    show how robust it is

11
Markov Processes
  • Markov chain - a stochastic process with what is
    called the Markov property
  • Discrete and continuous versions
  • Discrete consists of sequence X1,X2,X3,.... of
    random variables in a "state space", with Xn
    being "the state of the system at time n".
  • Markov property - conditional distribution of the
    "future" Xn1, Xn2, Xn3, .... given the "past
    (X1,X2,X3,...Xn), depends on the past only
    through Xn.
  • i.e. no memory of how Xn reached
  • Famous example random walk

12
Markov (cont.)
  • i.e., knowledge of the most recent past state of
    the system renders knowledge of less recent
    history irrelevant.
  • Markov chain may be identified with its matrix of
    "transition probabilities", often called simply
    its transition matrix (T) .
  • Entries in T given by pij P(Xn1 j Xn i
    )
  • pij probability that system in state j
    "tomorrow" given that it is in state i "today".
  • ij entry in the k th power of the matrix of
    transition probabilities is the conditional
    probability that k "days" in the future the
    system will be in state j, given that it is in
    state i "today".

13
Markov Applications
  • Markov chains used to model various processes in
    queuing theory and statistics , and can also be
    used as a signal model in entropy coding
    techniques such as arithmetic coding.
  • Note Markov created this theory from analyzing
    patterns in words, syllables, etc.

14
Infrastructure Application
  • Used to predict/estimate transitions in states,
    e.g. for bridge conditions
  • Used by Bridge Management Systems, e.g. PONTIS,
    to help see portfolio effects of assets under
    control
  • Helps plan expenditures/effort/etc.
  • Need empirical studies to derive parameters
  • Source for next few slides Chase and Gaspar,
    Journal of Bridge Engineering, November 2000.

15
Sample Transition Matrix


T
  • Thus pii suggests probability of staying in same
    state, 1- pii probability of getting worse
  • Could simplify this type of model by just
    describing vector P of pii probabilities (1 -
    pii) values are easily calculated from P
  • Condition distribution of bridge originally in
    state i after M transitions is CiTM

16
Superstructure Condition
  • NBI instructions
  • Code 9 Excellent
  • Code 0 Failed/out of service
  • If we assume no rehab/repair effects, then
    bridges only get worse over time
  • Thus transitions (assuming they are slow) only go
    from Code i to Code i-1
  • Need 10x10 matrix T
  • Just an extension of the 5x5 example above

17
Empirical Results
  • P 0.71, 0.95, 0.96, 0.97, 0.97, 0.97, 0.93,
    0.86, 1
  • Could use this kind of probabilistic model result
    to estimate actual transitions

18
More Complex Models
  • What about using more detailed bridge parameters
    to guess deficiency?
  • Binary deficient or not
  • What kind of random variable is this?
  • What types of other variables needed?

19
Logistic Models
  • Want Pr(j occurs) Pr (Yj) F(effects)
  • Logistic distribution
  • Pr (Y1) ebX/ (1 ebX)
  • Where bX is our usual regression type model
  • Example sewer pipes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com