Title: Critical Infrastructure: the chemical industry
1Critical Infrastructure the chemical industry
- Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the
Environment - Directorate of External Safety
2Introduction
- Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the
Environment VROM (3500 p) - Directorate External Safety (30 p)
- linked to
- Directorate General Environment (400p)
- Directorate General Spatial Planning (300p)
3Global characteristics the chemical industry
- Global characteristics of the industry in the NL
- 16.3 million inhabitants
- 40.000 square km
- 500.000 companies
- 300 Seveso II sites
- 160 Seveso reporting sites
- 1000 storages of chemicals and pesticides
- 2200 LPG filling stations
4Authorities and parties involved
- Authorities and parties involved with the risks
of the chemical industry - Central Government Policy and Legislation
- Implementation EU directives
- Provinces (12) and Municipalities (450)
- Environmental Management Act Land-use Act
- Regional Fire brigades
- Disaster and Major accidents Act prevention,
emergency - planning, rescue operations
- Inspectorates of the ministries
-
-
5Project Vitaal Critical Infrastructure, the
chemical industry
- April 2002 Start project Critical (Vital)
Infrastructure - Main objectives
- Development of a coherent set of measures to
protect the critical infrastructure (incl. ICT) - Establishment of these measures within the
normal operations of the companies and the
authorities - At first the chemical industry was not selected
as a critical sector, but it was added to the
project in 2004 - Reason potentially vulnerable sector in terms of
victims and societal disruption
6VROM Coördination the chemical industry
- Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the
Environment - (VROM) responsible for
- Drinking water sector
- Nuclear sector
- (Chemical) industry (dangerous substances)
-
- 3 different directorates involved
coordination by the - VROM-Inspectorate
-
7Objectives
- September 2004 start project
- Dangerous substances and deliberate violation
- Objectives
- Inventory of possible effects of terrorist
attacks - (chemical sites and storages dangerous
substances) - Inventory of the vulnerability of the Dutch
industry for such - attacks
- (stationary installations and transport of
dangerous goods) - Ranking of vulnerabilities and if necessary
development of - extra measures for companies and on policy
level -
8Project outline
- The project is executed by VROM in cooperation
with - Other ministries
- security/intelligence experts,
- the provinces
- The Association of Dutch Enterprises (VNO/NCW)
- A (limited) international benchmark is also
part of the project -
- In September 2005 a report shall be sent to
Parliament -
-
-
9Results so far
- Results of the project so far are (mid-February
2005) - A ranking of the most important establishments
based on - potential casualties has been drawn up
- The maximum possible effects of potential
deliberate violations - during the transport of dangerous goods by
rail, road and - ship have been calculated
- Vulnerability analysis chemical sector and
transport dangerous - goods has been performed with assistance of
security experts
10Intended disturbance what to analyse?
- Vulnerability analysis
- terrorist, employee, criminal, hooligan,
anti-globalists and - other activists, hacker
- type of weapon
- type of industry or other vulnerable objects
- (many people in the neighbourhood of
dangerous substances) - possibilities for protection (resistance)
11A possible approach
- Quick scan should give information on
- Amount of casualties (deaths and wounded)
- Infrastructural damage
- Evacuations/displaced persons
- Contamination
- Economic impact
- Potential for multiple events
- Recovery time
- From geographical considerations and event
dynamics one should focus on - Prevention/deterrence/protection
- Emergency Assesment/Diagnosis
- Emergency Management/Response
- Incident/Hazard Mitigation
- Public protection
- Victim care
- Investigation/Apprehension
- Recovery/Remediation
12Old USA examples of Quick wins
2002 Clorine factory after 1 mln USD security
investment still easy access to clorine gas pens
due to gates left open.
2002 an unsecured gate gives access to 200.000
ponds of chlorine gas.
2002 fencing supposed to keep intruders away
from a warehouse and its lethal anhydrous
ammonia.
13Activities in the next three months
- Quick-scan inventory and evaluation of existing
security measures for (most of) the selected
establishments - Quick scan of situations of hazardous substances
with large public events - International benchmark of security measures in
the chemical industry - Discussion with companies and transport
organisations about estimated effect levels and
existing/necessary security levels - Report to the Parliament
14 Benchmark
- The Netherlands has little to no experience
with terrorisme in relation to the chemical
industry. Therefore we need to learn from other
countries and their experiences - UK
- USA
- France
- Germany
-
15Questions
- responsability for the protection of critical
infrastructure state, district, (province),
municipalities - the balance between private companies
authorities - security measures in chemical sites
- quality control
- role of authorities, inspectorates
16Dilemma need to know or need to share?
- What about the confidential information versus
the community right to know
17Information on risks
- Information to the public about risks in the
Netherlands - Seveso directive (Major Accidents Hazards
Decree, 1999) - Two initiatives after fireworks explosion in
Enschedé - Ministry of Interior
risk mapping - Ministry of HSP the Environment risk
register
18Discussion
- Safety reports do not give all the information
we need - ( information from emergency planning is
also necessary) - Experience from USA (ACC/SOCMA-methodology and
of - Port Authorities (IMO) can be used for
assessment of security - UK experience and approach can be useful for
NL - EC has taken initiatives (CCA and CIP
committees)
19More Information
- For further information
- directie.externeveiligheid_at_minvrom.nl