Binning Strategies for Tissue Texture Extraction in DICOM Images PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Binning Strategies for Tissue Texture Extraction in DICOM Images


1
  • Binning Strategies for Tissue Texture Extraction
    in DICOM Images
  • CTI Students Bikash Bhattacharyya, Kriti Jauhar
  • Advisors Dr. Daniela Raicu, Dr. Jacob Furst
  • Submitted To RSNA Conference 05, Chicago, IL

2
Why Binning ?
? Binning Definition Putting
gray-levels into bins for image compression
e.g. 1,2,3,4 gray levels in Bin 1
5,6,7,8 gray levels in Bin 2?DICOM Images
12 Bit - 4096 intensities?Texture Feature
Calculation All intensities - SLOW?Binning
allows for additional flexibility to trade off
large intensity ranges against computational
speed
COMPUTATION PERFORMANCE
3
Linear Binning
? Linear Binning - Bins of equal size
256 bins for DICOM images produces bin
ranges 0..15 , 16..31 ,4081..4096 ? Quick
and Efficient approach ? Pre -processing step
for Harlick texture feature calculation?
Promising results for classification of tissues
based on Haralick texture
features
4
Disadvantages of Linear Binning
  • Soft tissues with similar intensities may end up
    in
  • the same bin with linear binning ? Soft
    tissues misclassification ? Accuracy of Liver
    and Spleen not very high? Computed Tomography
    images contain low
  • number of pixel in the range 1500 4096
  • Non-Linear Binning Is it possible to improve
  • accuracy of soft tissues?

5
Analysis of Linear Binning (contd.)
EXAMPLES
Spleen
Liver
6
PROCESS SUMMARY
7
Two Approaches of Non-Linear Binning
  • Clipped Binning based on visual inspection of
    gray levels
  • Range 0, 856 mapped to Bin 1
  • Range 1368 , 4096 mapped to Bin 258
  • Range 856, 1368 mapped to 256 linear bins
  • e.g. 856 to 858 gray levels in Bin 123

Non Linear Binning based on K-Means Clustering
256 Clusters Compare results of 256
linear-bins Distance Measure Euclidean
Clusters of Gray Level Ranges Gray Level
ranges form Non-linear Bins
8
Process Flow
Non-linear Binning using K-Means
9
K-Means
  • K 256
  • 141 Dimensions/Images
  • 4096 points/Gray Levels
  • Initial Points /Random Centroids
  • Similarity Metric Euclidean Distance
  • Issues
  • 263 Unique Gray Levels Identified
  • Multiple Gray Levels Identified in one Cluster
    e.g. Cluster 14 has gray levels from 462 to
    884 Cluster 14 also has gray
    levels from 1540 to 1542

10
Classification Results TRAINING SET
11
Classification Results TESTING SET
12
Graphical User Interface
13
Conclusion
  • Non-Linear Binning with K-Means gave
    us the best overall results (
    86.35)
  • Results for Liver and Spleen improved from
    73.80 to 91.03 for liver and 70.50 to 74.58
    for spleen
  • Clipped Binning performed poorly on testing set
    with overall
    sensitivity of only 68.85
  • Results with K-Means improved over Linear
    Binning

14
Future Work
  • Experimenting with bins other than 256 such as
    64, 128 etc.
  • Exploring other similarity measures such as
    Jeffrey Divergence, Mahalanobis Distance etc.
  • Testing other classification algorithms besides
    decision trees, such as Neural Networks,
    Bayesian Networks, Logistic Regression etc.

15
References
  • 1 M. Kalinin, D. S. Raicu, J. D. Furst, D. S.
    Channin,, " A Classification Approach for
    Anatomical Regions Segmentation", The IEEE
    International Conference on Image Processing
    (ICIP), September 11-14, 2005. (submitted)
  • 2 D. Channin, D. S. Raicu, J. D. Furst, D. H.
    Xu, L. Lilly, C. Limpsangsri, "Classification of
    Tissues in Computed Tomography using Decision
    Trees", RSNA, DECEMBER, 2004.
  • 3 R.M. Haralick, K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein,
    Textural Features for Image Classification,
    IEEE Trans. on Systems,Man, and Cybernetics, vol.
    Smc-3, no.6, pp. 610-621, 1973.
  • 4 N. M. Nasrabadi and R. A. King., Image
    Coding Using Vector Quantization A review ,
    IEEE Transaction on Communications,
    36(8)957-971, August 1988. 5 Wei-Ying Ma and
    B. S. Manjunath, A Texture Thesaurus for
    Browsing Large Aerial Photographs, Journal Of
    The American Society For Information Science,
    49(7)633648, 1998.
  • 6 Dongqing Chen, Lihong Li, and Zhengrong
    Liang, A Self-adaptive Vector Quantization
    Algorithm for MR Image Segmentation ,
    ISMRM,1999.
  • 7 Qixiang Ye2 Wen Gao Wei Zeng1, Color Image
    Segmentation Using Density-Based Clustering,
    ICASSP, 2003, Presentation.

16
References
  • 8 Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jorg
    Sander, XiaoWei Xu, A Density-Based Algorithm
    for Discovering Spatial Databases With Noise,
    Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on
    Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996.
  • 9 Texture Classification of Normal Tissues in
    Computed Tomography D. Xu, J. Lee, D.S. Raicu, J.
    D. Furst, D. Channin, The 2005 Annual Meeting of
    the Society for Computer Applications in
    Radiology, Orlando, Florida, June 2-5, 2005.
  • 10 N. B. Karayiannis, "Soft learning vector
    quantization and clustering algorithms based on
    ordered weighted aggregation operators," IEEE
    Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 11, no. 5,
    pp. 1093-1105, 2000.
  • 11 N. Papamarkos and B. Gatos, "A new approach
    for multithreshold selection", Computer Vision,
    Graphics, and Image Processing-Graphical Models
    and Image Processing, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp.
    357-370, Sept. 1994
  • 12 A. Atsalakis, N. Kroupis , D. Soudris, and
    N. Papamarkos, "A window-based color quantization
    technique and its architecture implementation",
    ICIP2002, Rochester, USA.
  • 13  N. Papamarkos, A. Atsalakis and C.
    Strouthopoulos, "Adaptive Color Reduction", IEEE
    Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B,
    Vol. 32, No. 1, Feb. 2002.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com