EASA Regulatory Framework A Canadian Perspective Presentation to EASAs International Cooperation For - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

EASA Regulatory Framework A Canadian Perspective Presentation to EASAs International Cooperation For

Description:

No offence-creating provisions for unfulfilled obligations. 12 ... Offence creating provisions require or prohibit a specific behavior or conduct from a person. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:195
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: alexand107
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EASA Regulatory Framework A Canadian Perspective Presentation to EASAs International Cooperation For


1
EASA Regulatory Framework - A Canadian
Perspective Presentation to EASAs
International Cooperation ForumWorkshop 5
Legal/Institutional Aspects30 October 2008by
Gilles Morin
2
Agenda
  • Introduction
  • Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) vs. EASA
    Regulatory Framework
  • Flight 2010
  • Safety Management Systems
  • Accountability Framework
  • Approved Design Orgnizations
  • Legal Implications
  • TCCAs Design Standards based on EASAs
    Certification Specifications (CS)
  • Canada-Europe Aviation Safety Agreement

3
INTRODUCTION
  • Purpose of this briefing is
  • To explain the Canadian Aviation Regulations
    (CAR) system and describe some of the
    similarities with the European civil aviation
    regulatory framework
  • To discuss examples of how each regulatory
    framework influences each other.

4
TCCA/EASA Regulatory Instruments
Aeronautics Act
Basic Regulation
Canadian Aviation Regulations
Implementation Rules
IR / CAR
Airworthiness Manual
Certification Specifications
CS / AWM
Advisory Circulars
Acceptable Means of Compliance / Guidance
Material
AMC / AC
Staff Instructions

EASA Administrative procedures
GM / SI
5
Canadian Aviation Regulations
  • Part I - General Provisions
  • Part II - Aircraft Identification and
    Registration and Operation of a Leased Aircraft
    by a Non-registered Owner
  • Part III - Aerodromes, Airports and Heliports
  • Part IV - Personnel Licensing and Training
  • Part V - Airworthiness
  • Part VI - General Operating and Flight Rules
  • Part VII - Commercial Air Services
  • Part VIII - Air Navigation Services
  • Part IX - Repeals and Coming into Force

6
TCCA REGULATORY STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES
7
FLIGHT 2010
  • F2010 is the TCCA Strategic Direction we must
    satisfy.
  • The four goals of F2010 strategic plan are
  • Commitment from the aviation community to sustain
    a strong safety culture.
  • Trust and Confidence of stakeholders in the civil
    Aviation Program.
  • Alignment of expectations for Civil Aviation and
    stakeholders.
  • Compliance with regulatory requirements.

8
Safety Management System (SMS)
  • A documented process for managing risks that
    integrates operations and technical systems with
    the management of financial and human resources
    to ensure aviation safety or the safety of the
    public.
  • Transport Canada committed to the implementation
    of safety management systems in aviation
    organizations.
  • Improves safety through pro-active management
    rather than reactive compliance with regulatory
    requirements.
  • Applies to holders of Transport Canada issued
    operation certificates.

9
Accountability Framework (AF)
  • An Accountability Framework is a structure where
  • Each stakeholder have clear understanding of
    their roles and obligations.
  • No confusion exists on WHO is accountable for
    WHAT.

10
SMS and AF in Design Organizations
  • SMS must be applied to design organizations to
    enhance the accountabilities of each
    stakeholders.
  • To implement SMS within Design organizations,
    TCCA must first develop a tool to recognize their
    knowledge and technical capabilities.
  • TCCA will introduce Approved Design Organizations
    (ADO) certification.
  • The ADO model is strongly influenced by the
    European Design Organization Approval (DAO)
    requirements found in IR-21.

11
How does this approach compare to EASAs DOA?
  • EASAs DOA model serves as a basis for TCCAs ADO
  • Eligibility requirements already exist for
    applicants and holders.
  • DOA scheme very similar to accreditation scheme
    being considered by TCCA.
  • Alternate procedures scheme exists for certain
    types of design approvals.
  • No Delegation scheme exists.
  • No offence-creating provisions for unfulfilled
    obligations.

12
Legal implications
  • Accountability implies an obligation, that if
    unfulfilled, leads to some form of legal or
    punitive action (enforcement).
  • In accordance with the Aeronautics Act, the
    Minister can designate provisions in our
    regulation
  • Eg. The holder of a type certificate holder
    shall
  • CAR 103 sets the monetary penalty against a
    person whom the Minister believes has contravened
    a designated regulation.

13
Legal implications
  • Offence creating provisions require or prohibit a
    specific behavior or conduct from a person.
  • The designated provision must include all the
    necessary details in order for the regulatee to
    be aware of what needs to be done to comply with
    the regulatory requirement.

14
Legal implications without/with ADO
  • Without ADO, non compliances cannot be addressed
    adequately because no approval certificate exists
    for the design organization. Only a type design
    certificate exists.
  • With ADO, non compliances can be better addressed
    because roles, responsibilities and obligations
    of the certificates (organization and product)
    holders will be clearly defined.
  • ADO certificate also allows to have a
    well-balanced oversight between type design and
    system.
  • ADO certificate also clearly distinguishes
    between delegation and privileges

15
Design Standards based on CS
  • Gliders and Powered Gliders
  • CS-22 now serves as the basis for the
    requirements for AWM 522
  • Very Light Aircraft (VLA)
  • CS-VLA being considered as the new basis for the
    requirements.
  • CS-22 and CS-VLA used and adapted as the model
    for the equivalent Canadian design standards
    supplemented by additional airworthiness
    requirements based on operational experience and
    environmental conditions in Canada.
  • Changes to CS can be adopted into AWM using
    simplified rulemaking procedure.

16
Canada - Europe Aviation Safety Agreement
  • Promote reciprocal acceptance of each others
    certification processes in the approval of civil
    aviation products and services.
  • Enhance aviation safety through diligently
    resolving aeronautical safety issues between
    Canada and Europe.
  • Facilitation of reciprocal acceptance of
    aeronautical products and services between Canada
    and Europe.
  • Reduced need for re-certification and audits
    resulting in economic benefits for both European
    and Canadian aviation industry.

17
For more information.
  • General information
  • http//www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/menu.htm
  • Canadian Aviation Regulations
  • http//www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/RegServ/affairs/
    cars/menu.htm
  • Safety Management Systems
  • http//www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/SMS/menu.htm
  • Designated Provisions
  • http//www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Regserv/Affairs/
    cars/Part1/103.htm103_08

18
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com