Slavery Divides the Nation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Slavery Divides the Nation

Description:

As the nation grew larger in the 1800's, people questioned whether slavery would ... As you might expect, Southerners were overjoyed, they could take slaves into all ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: JohnK176
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Slavery Divides the Nation


1
Slavery Divides the Nation
2
The Nations ExpandsDoes Slavery???
  • As the nation grew larger
    in the 1800s, people
    questioned whether
    slavery would
    be allowed
    in the new territories and
    states.
  • Southern slave owners wanted western lands to
    allow slaverythe land was perfect for farming.

3
The Nations ExpandsDoes Slavery???
  • Slavery in the West raised an important issue
    concerning the balance of power between the North
    and the South in Congress.
  • In 1819, there were 22 states in the U.S. 11
    free and 11 slave.
  • Both sides wanted the new territories to go along
    with their views in order to have more support in
    Congress.

4
The Nations ExpandsDoes Slavery???
  • In 1819, Missouri applied to be the 23rd state.
  • Northerners wanted it to be a free state
    Southerners wanted it a slave state.

5
The Missouri Compromise
  • After fierce debate, the Missouri Compromise was
    adopted in 1820.
  • The Compromise said
  • Missouri would enter the Union (United States as
    a slave state.
  • Maine would enter the Union as a free state.
  • Slavery would no longer be permitted north of the
    southern border of Missouri.
  • Would the Missouri Compromise settle the question
    of slavery in the West???

6
(No Transcript)
7
The Nations ExpandsDoes Slavery???
  • After The Mexican-American War, the U.S. expanded
    further west.
  • The new territories were not part of the Missouri
    Compromise.
  • Would they be free or slave???

8
The Nations ExpandsDoes Slavery???
  • At the time, there were 3 main opinions on
    whether slavery would be allowed in these new
    territories.
  • One group (slave owners) believed Congress had no
    right to ban slavery in new territories.
  • One group wanted slavery barred completely from
    all new territories.
  • One group wanted the people (settlers) in the new
    territories to decide.

9
The Nations ExpandsDoes Slavery???
  • In the end, Congress worked out another
    compromise, The Compromise of 1850.
  • The Compromise of 1850 angered as many people as
    it pleased.

10
The Compromise of 1850
  • The Compromise of 1850 said
  • California would become the 16th free
    statecompared to 15 slave states.
  • Two new territories, New Mexico and Utah, would
    vote whether to allow slavery.
  • The slave trade was illegal in Washington D.C.
  • The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was enacted.

11
(No Transcript)
12
Fugitive Slave Act of 1850
  • A fugitive is someone who has run away.
  • The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850
  • Set a 6-month jail term and 1000 fine for people
    helping slaves escape.
  • Said courts had to take the word of a slave owner
    who claimed an African American as their slave.
  • The act made it very easy for slave catchers to
    catch slaves.

13
(No Transcript)
14
More Fights Over Slavery
  • The Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 created two new
    territories (Kansas and Nebraska) and let voters
    decide whether to allow slavery.
  • This angered many Northerners as it went against
    the Missouri Compromise.
  • What do you think happened in these new
    territories?

15
(No Transcript)
16
Bleeding Kansas
  • People who both opposed and were in favor of
    slavery rush to settle in the new territories.
  • Battles broke out in Kansas. Over 200 people
    were killed in the fights.
  • So much fighting occurred that the territory was
    called Bleeding Kansas.

17
More Battles Over Slavery
  • In 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court issued the Dred
    Scott decision.
  • Dred Scott was a slave who went to court to claim
    his freedom.
  • He argued that he became free when his owner took
    him where slavery was not allowed (Illinois and
    Minnesota).
  • What do you think the Supreme Court said?

18
The Dred Scott Decision (1857)
  • The Supreme Court ruled on three pointsOn all
    three, Scott lost. The Court said
  • First, Scott had no right to sue since he was of
    African descentthis meant he was not a U.S.
    citizen.
  • Second, because Scott was a slave, he was
    property. People had a right to take their
    property anywhere.
  • Finally, the Missouri Compromise was
    unconstitutional. If Congress barred slavery, it
    robbed slave owners of property rightsguaranteed
    under the Constitution.

19
Responses to the Dred Scott Decision
  • As you might expect, Southerners were overjoyed,
    they could take slaves into all U.S. territories.
  • Northerners were outraged, they felt they could
    no longer stop slavery from spreading.

20
Raid on Harpers Ferry
  • John Brown was an abolitionist who decided to
    take action.
  • He launched a slave uprising on the night of
    October 16, 1859.
  • With a band of 18 men, he attacked a federal
    arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia.

21
Raid on Harpers Ferry
  • Although John Brown and his men captured the
    arsenal, their raid failed.
  • No slaves joined them and after two days of
    battle, soldiers killed or seized Brown and his
    men.
  • Brown was hanged. To many people, Brown was a
    hero of the fight against slavery.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com