OQ 2: The New Direction in Operator Qualification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

OQ 2: The New Direction in Operator Qualification

Description:

Inadequacies Observed in Operator OQ Program Plans. Need for Structure in ... Identify Noteworthy Practices and Promote their Broader Use. OQ2: Operator Goals ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: mill48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OQ 2: The New Direction in Operator Qualification


1
OQ 2 The New Direction inOperator Qualification
2
The Reasons for OQ2
  • Inadequacies Observed in Operator OQ Program
    Plans
  • Need for Structure in Inspection Process

3
The Reasons for OQ2
  • National Transportation Safety Board Closure on
    OQ
  • Potential Congressional Imposition of
    Certification Requirements

4
OQ2 Reality
  • OPS Is Not Staying
  • Enforcement of the
  • Operator Qualification Rule

5
OQ2 The Problem
  • We are Quickly Approaching October 28, and
    Operator Program Implementation Issues Exist

6
OQ2 The Problem
  • A Surge of Inspection and Enforcement Activity
    Based on Clarified Regulatory Expectations would
    not be Productive

7
OQ2 Regulatory Goals
  • Ensure That All Persons, Including Contractors,
    are Qualified to Perform Covered Tasks (Same as
    OQ1)

8
OQ2 Regulatory Goals
  • Support Early Post-Implementation Inspections

9
OQ2 Regulatory Goals
  • Promote Uniformity of Inspection and Enforcement
    Federal and State

10
OQ2 Regulatory Goals
  • Identify Noteworthy Practices and Promote their
    Broader Use

11
OQ2 Operator Goals
  • Ensure that all Persons, Including Contractors,
    are Qualified to Perform Covered Tasks (Same as
    OQ1)

12
OQ2 Operator Goals
  • Evaluate OQ Program Plans Relative to Clarified
    Regulatory Expectations

13
OQ2 Operator Goals
  • Identify Noteworthy Practices and Promote their
    Broader Use

14
OQ2 The Approach
  • Implement a Two-Stage Inspection Approach

15
OQ2 The Approach
  • Institute Web-Based Communications to Convey
    Expectations Gather Issues

16
OQ2 The Approach
  • Develop Structured Inspection Protocols and
    Supporting Inspector Guidance (Like that Being
    Used With the Integrity Management Rule)

17
OQ2 The Approach
  • Require Training of Inspectors in Use of the
    Protocols

18
OQ2 Two Stages of Implementation
  • Stage 1 Inspectors will Focus on High Risk
    Areas Reinforce Expectations
  • Begin Inspections after October 28, 2002

19
OQ2 Two Stages of Implementation
  • Stage 2 Comprehensive OQ Inspections
  • Fully Implemented by June, 2003

20
What Are High Risk Areas?
  • Significant Elements of the OQ Process
  • Process to Address AOCs
  • Process to Manage Contractor Qualification
  • Basis for Reevaluation Intervals

21
What Are High Risk Areas?
  • Perceived High Risk Tasks
  • Control Center Operation
  • Application of Pipe Coating
  • Monitor for Internal Corrosion

22
Features of Web-Based Communications
  • Flow Diagram of Steps in Rule Implementation
  • Rule Provisions
  • Preamble Insights
  • FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
  • Inspection Protocols

23
Features of Web-Based Communications
  • The Ability to Pose Rule-Related Questions
  • Structured Process for Developing and Posting
    Response to Questions

24
Operator Qualification Rule Process Flow
2. Identify Covered Tasks and Related
Evaluation Methods
1. Document Program Plan, Implementing Procedures
, and Qualification Criteria
3. Identify Persons Performing Covered Tasks
No Longer Qualified
4. Evaluate Qualify Persons Performing Covered
Tasks, Including Recognizing and Reacting to
Abnormal Operating Conditions
Yes
Should Person be Reevaluated? (Questionable Perfo
rmance, Reevaluation Due)
5. Continued/Periodic Evaluation of Persons
Performing Covered Tasks
No
6. Monitor Program Performance, Identify
Analyze Potential Improvements
8. Manage Change
7. Maintain Program Records
25
Operator Qualification Rule Example of
Performance Protocol
Determination of Reevaluation Interval for
Coating Application
  • Performance Monitoring (Examples)
  • Post-Installation Quality Check,
  • Requirement to Apply Coating at
  • Least Monthly to Maintain
  • Qualification
  • Qualified Inspector Periodically
  • Observes Application Practice, and/or
  • Qualified Independent Verifier
  • Periodically Observes Application
  • Practice

Performance Actively Monitored After Qualification
?
Initial Qualification Evaluation by (a) Written
Examination, and (b) Observation During
Simulation of Task Performance
Yes
No
Assign Minimal Reevaluation Interval (e.g., 12
Months)
Assign Reevaluation Interval Longer Than
Minimal (e.g., 3 to 5 Years)
26
Information on OQ2
  • Http//primis.rspa.dot.gov
  • Http//www.tsi.dot.gov
  • Http//www.ops.dot.gov
  • Http//www.rspa.dot.gov

27
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com