Keeping Kids in School: An LAs BEST Example - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Keeping Kids in School: An LAs BEST Example

Description:

LA's BEST attendance record ... A stratified random sample of non-participants matched on grade level, gender, ... LA's BEST vs LAUSD non participants (3 years) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: larry112
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Keeping Kids in School: An LAs BEST Example


1
Keeping Kids in School An LAs BEST Example
Denise Huang
American Educational Research AssociationAnnual
Meeting San Francisco, CA - April 7-11, 2006
2
The Purposes of After School Program
  • In the 80s, after school programs were available
    to students at a much smaller scale
  • The purpose is mainly to provide safety
  • The opportunities for students to engage in
    enrichment activities
  • Develop healthy habits and citizenship

3
No Child Left Behind Act (2002)
  • An emphasis is placed on schools to improve
    academic achievement, particularly for students
    at risk
  • Schools that are not performing well can use
    after school programs as supplemental services to
    improve student performance
  • More funding becomes available, both from the
    government and private sector
  • For the last 3 years, the 21st Community Learning
    Center is working with a budget of 1 billion

4
LAs BEST Better Educated students for Tomorrow
  • Serving 23,000 students over 147 school sites
  • Focus on developing the whole child
  • Education, enrichment, recreation
  • Community resources
  • Research-based curricula

5
Summary of Findings Academic Performance
  • Overall LAs BEST students either maintained or
    improved their SAT-9 /CAT-6 or CST performances
  • Pre-post analyses indicates that students
    improved their school attendance after
    participating in LAs BEST

6
Summary of Findings Social Development
  • concerns about safety
  • conflict resolution
  • academic self-efficacy
  • study habits
  • family involvement
  • future aspirations

7
Who Benefited Most
  • LEP students
  • Female students
  • Students who attended more regularly
  • Students who scored low initially on attitudinal
    surveys (self-efficacy, work habits, conflict
    resolution skills)
  • Students with low performance in test scores

8
Purpose of this Study
  • When pasting text from another document, do the
    following
  • Highlight the text you want to replace
  • Go to the EDIT menu and select PASTE SPECIAL
  • Select Paste as UNFORMATTED TEXT
  • Does participation in the LAs BEST program have
    an impact on former participants long-term
    educational behaviors, such as staying in school?
  • What is the minimum number of years of
    participation in LAs BEST needed to see an
    effect on dropout rates?
  • Does participation in the LAs BEST program have
    a varying effect on dropout rates for different
    gender, language, income level, and ethnic groups?

9
Significance of the Study
  • When pasting text from another document, do the
    following
  • Highlight the text you want to replace
  • Go to the EDIT menu and select PASTE SPECIAL
  • Select Paste as UNFORMATTED TEXT
  • 745,000 students enrolled in LAUSD, a third would
    not graduate
  • In 2003-2004 academic year only 66.4 LAUSD
    students graduated vs. 79.3 of LA county rate
    and 85.3 of CBEDS
  • Provide concrete evidences for the public/private
    investment in ASP
  • Filled a gap in the current literature
  • Spark the interest for future long-term effect
    studies to follow

10
Data Source
  • LAUSD longitudinal database
  • LAs BEST attendance record
  • Four cohorts of LAs BEST participants (6th
    through 9th grade in 1998-1999)
  • Three levels of participation examined 1 year, 2
    years, and 3 years

11
Sample
  • All LAs BEST students were included
  • A stratified random sample of non-participants
    matched on grade level, gender, ethnicity, and
    standardized test scores
  • Approximately 6000 participants and 6000
    non-participants

12
Statistical Approach
  • Descriptive statistics to provide demographic
    profiles
  • Chi-square analysis
  • Cox survival analysis to examine the effects of
    participation, gender, ethnicity, low income
    status, and LEP status

13
Demographics
14
Results
  • Chi square analysis indicate no difference for 1
    year of participation
  • Statistical difference was found with 2 years of
    participation with the 9th grade cohort in 1998
  • Difference was strongest for the 3 years
    participants.

15
Comparison of dropout rates for LAs BEST vs
LAUSD non participants (3 years)
  • To adjust the slide numbering, do the following
  • Go to the VIEW menu, MASTER, and select SLIDE
    MASTER
  • In the lower right, change the number 28 to your
    number of slides
  • Do not change the ltgt character. It generates
    the auto-numbers.

16
Results of Cox Analysis
  • Male students, Hispanic students, and LEP
    students were more likely to drop out
  • Participation in LAs BEST can significantly
    reduce LAUSD students drop out rate
  • This effect is compounded with intensity of
    participation
  • This effect is also significant with low-income
    students

17
Conclusion
  • It appears that LAs BEST has provided a
    supportive structure for the kids to stay in
    school
  • After school programs that focused on fostering
    meaningful and substantive activities could lead
    to positive social and academic development,
    thereby increasing the likelihood of finishing
    high school and future success.

18
Next Steps
  • Develop strategies to increase high participation
    and attendance of afterschool programs
  • Develop strategies to recruit the kids most in
    need e.g. male, LEP students, low income students
  • DOJ study to share more precise findings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com