Hong Kong and Singapore: CityStates in Transition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Hong Kong and Singapore: CityStates in Transition

Description:

Laissez Faire non Interventionist. Developed manufacturing sector ... Result: Still interventionist. Hong Kong: Positive Non-Interventionism ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: informatio57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hong Kong and Singapore: CityStates in Transition


1
Hong Kong and Singapore City-States in Transition
  • Kelly Kolker

2
Similarities
  • Externally oriented industrialization
  • No contention with rural-based elites
  • Free operation of labor markets
  • Government STRONG and independent executives
    Weak subordinate legislatures.

3
Differences
  • SINGAPORE
  • Economic Policy Interventionist
  • Foreign Investment
  • Weak domestic private sector
  • Peoples Action Party (PAP) social conflicts
  • HONG KONG
  • Laissez-Faire
  • Local Firms
  • Large entrepreneurial capability in domestic
    sector
  • No one contested political authority Power in
    Financial Secretariat

4
Singapore
  • Industrialization
  • Manufacturing Industries Tin Rubber Weak
  • Peoples Action Party 1959) Control Structure
    under Lee Kuan Yew
  • Independence from Malaysia Shift from ISI to,
    Export Oriented system
  • The government used an external crisis to impose
    both a new dev. Strategy and a new level of labor
    discipline. (113)

5
State Institutions Economy
  • Economic Development Board (EDB)
  • Desirable Industries
  • adversely affect other industries
  • fill a gap in the industrial structure
  • generate linkages with other industries
  • Investment Promotion Division (IPD)
  • Attract foreign investment

6
Hong Kong
  • Industrialization
  • Laissez Faire non Interventionist
  • Developed manufacturing sector
  • Developed commercial and banking establishments
  • Political Structure Similar to EA Pattern
  • External Shocks Chinese Revolution and UN
    Embargo on trade with China

7
Political and Institutional Foundations of
Laissez Faire
  • Macro-level no trade restrictions, no central
    bank
  • Micro-level Industry not a function of
    government loans, subsidies or protection
  • No distinction between local and foreign firms
  • Government LAND, water, postal system, and
    airport services.

8
The Second Industrial Revolution 1979
  • Singapore Upgrading its exports
  • Control of labor
  • Ten Year Economic Development Plan
  • Goal increase the share of the manufacturing
    sector in GNP
  • Second Industrial Revolution confirmed dominance
    of multi-nationals

9
2nd Generation of PAP and Downturn
  • Technocrats Little if any political experience
    bureaucracy, academia, private sector
  • Downturn short-term factors and governments
    management of economy balance of power between
    the public sector and foreign and local firms.
  • Over 100 state-owned enterprises that competed
    directly with the private sector
  • Result Still interventionist

10
Hong Kong Positive Non-Interventionism
  • State Intervention 4 areas
  • Control of monetary policy and the foreign
    exchange markets
  • Regulation of the Financial Sector
  • Extending basic social services education,
    medical services, public housing
  • Sponsor industrial and economic advisory boards
    to maintain a dialog with the private sector over
    economic policy

11
Hong Kong Financial Center
  • Contributing Factors
  • Location rapid economic development of the
    region
  • Demand for an international financial center in
    an East Asian Time Zone

12
Political Environment
  • Sino-British Agreement 1984 Guaranteed the
    continuity of the capitalist system for half a
    century after sovereignty had been reverted to
    China in 1997. (154)
  • Created a Crisis of Confidence
  • HK dollar pegged to US dollar
  • Growing relations with China
  • Joint Declaration

13
Singapore v. Hong Kong
  • Importance of domestic structures and ideologies
    in shaping national responses to external
    pressures
  • Singapore aggressive toward industrial
    adjustment
  • Hong Kong Maintained a non-interventionist policy

14
Political Liberalization
  • Domestic Pressures
  • Members of the bureaucracy who believe in
    government activism
  • Private Sector Support v. Unnecessary
    Direction
  • Speed and direction of adjustment will be
    affected expanding scope and level of political
    participation

15
What Next?
  • Emergence of an attentive middle-classs
  • Increasing organizational capacities of societal
    actors more players, more demands on the state
  • Haggard Greater politicization will reduce the
    coherence of policy and the speed with which
    adjustments can be undertaken. (160)

16
Question/Discussion
  • Proposition Successful export-led growth demands
    state-intervention? True or False?
  • What was the fundamental reason for Singapores
    downturn in the 1980s?
  • Liberalizing Reforms Good Idea or Bad?
  • Greater political opportunities to oppositions
    over the long run, or will it serve as a
    deterrent to the coherence of policy and the
    speed with which adjustments can be undertaken?
    What does Haggard think?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com