Title: Module 4: PostAward Administration of Sponsored Projects Part 2
1Module 4 Post-Award Administration of Sponsored
Projects (Part 2)
- Office of Research and Sponsored Programs
- The University of Mississippi
- 100 Barr Hall 662-915-7482
- www.olemiss.edu/depts/research
2Part 2 of Module 4 provides detailed information
on some of the most common post-award
administration activities including
- Changes to an existing award
- Subawards
- Regrants
- Reporting
- Closeout
- Beyond closeout
3Changes to an existing award
4Changes to an existing award
- Some changes can be approved by the institution
(through the ORSP) this is called Expanded
Authorities (not applicable to federal
contracts) - Other changes require prior approval from the
sponsor - The award terms and conditions will tell you how
to handle changes to an existing award - Any change that is subject to Expanded
Authorities or that requires sponsor prior
approval should be processed through the ORSP
5Changes that always require sponsor prior approval
- Written prior approval from the sponsor is always
required for any of the following - Change in the project scope or objectives
- Absence of the principal investigator for more
than three months or a reduction of 25 or more
in effort devoted to the project - Change in key personnel
- The transfer of funds allotted for training
allowances (direct payment to trainees) to other
categories of expense - Transfer the performance of substantive work on
the project to a third party (subcontract,
subaward)
6Changes that sometimes require sponsor prior
approval
- Written prior approval from the sponsor is
sometimes required for any of the following - Purchase of equipment not in the approved budget
- Use of consultants
- Rebudgeting between direct and FA costs
7Changes that do not require sponsor prior approval
- OMB Circular A-110 permits federal granting
agencies to waive certain sponsor prior approval
requirements and gives the grantee institution
the authority to approve actions such as - Incurring pre-award costs (if allowed by the
agency) - First-time no-cost extension of up to one year
(but you cannot extend just to spend out
remaining funds) - Carry forward of unobligated balances
8How do I obtain prior approval?
- It depends on whether your award is
- Federal or
- Non-federal
9Obtaining prior approval on federal awards
- To obtain institutional prior approval, the
investigator should complete a UM Prior Approval
System for Federal Grants and Agreements form and
forward it to the ORSP - then
- The ORSP will request prior approval from the
sponsor if sponsor approval required or.. - The ORSP will notify the sponsor of the change if
institutional approval required
10Obtaining prior approval on non-federal awards
- Contact the ORSP
- The ORSP will request prior approval from the
sponsor if sponsor approval required or.. - The ORSP will notify the sponsor of the change if
institutional approval required
11Subawards
12Subawards
- Need for a subaward
- Initiating subawards
- Monitoring subawards
- Changing subawards
- Closing subawards
13Need for a subaward
- The potential need for a subaward should be
considered by the investigator at the proposal
stage. - Why?
- Because most funding agencies require written
approval before a subaward is issued - Because (depending on sponsor guidelines) other
information may be required such as - Letter of intent
- Biographical sketch
- Current and pending other support
- Available facilities information
14Initiating subawards
- The steps to be taken in initiating a subaward
depend upon whether - The subaward was included in the approved award
budget, or - The subaward was not included in the approved
award budget
15Initiating subawards Subaward included in
approved budget investigator responsibilities
- The investigator should forward the following to
the ORSP - Request to Issue Subcontract or Subcontract
Modification Under an Externally Funded Program
form - Statement of Work (approved by subaward
institution) - Budget (approved by subaward institution)
- Copy of the subrecipients FA Rate Agreement (if
FA is being requested) - then
16Initiating subawardsSubaward included in
approved budget ORSP responsibilities
- The ORSP will
- Determine that the subrecipient is not debarred
or suspended from receiving federal awards - Develop the subaward in compliance with
sponsoring agency guidelines, UM and subrecipient
policies and procedures - Obtain subrecipient A-133 Compliance
Certification, if applicable - Obtain signatures of the UM investigator, the
subrecipient authorized official, and the VC/ORSP
to execute the subaward - Create a purchase order to encumber funds
- Provide a copy of the fully executed subaward to
the UM investigator - Annually, ensure that the subrecipient remains
compliant with A-133 audit requirements
throughout the life of the subaward - Perform desk audits as necessary for review of
subrecipient fiscal records
17Initiating subawardsSubaward NOT included in
approved budget investigator responsibilities
- The investigator should
- Obtain sponsor approval to issue the subaward
(concurrence of the technical manager, then
approval of the grant/contract manager) - Document the basis for subrecipient selection
- Forward the following to the ORSP
- A Request to Issue Subcontract or Subcontract
Modification Under an Externally Funded Program
form - Statement of Work (approved by subaward
institution) - Budget (approved by subaward institution)
- Copy of the subrecipients FA Rate Agreement (if
FA is being requested) - Documentation of sponsor approval of the subaward
- then
18Initiating subawardsSubaward NOT included in
approved budget ORSP responsibilities
- The ORSP will
- Determine that the subrecipient is not debarred
or suspended from receiving federal awards - Develop the subaward in compliance with
sponsoring agency guidelines, UM and subrecipient
policies and procedures - Obtain subrecipient A-133 Compliance
Certification, if applicable - Obtain signatures of the UM investigator, the
subrecipient authorized official, and the VC/ORSP
to execute the subaward - Create a purchase order to encumber funds
- Provide a copy of the fully executed subaward to
the UM investigator - Annually, ensure that the subrecipient remains
compliant with A-133 audit requirements
throughout the life of the subaward - Perform desk audits as necessary for review of
subrecipient fiscal records
19Monitoring UM subawardsInvestigator
responsibilities
- Provide ongoing monitoring of subrecipients
programmatic and fiscal compliance throughout the
life of the subaward - Maintain regular contact with subaward principal
investigator regarding technical aspects of
project - Review and approve subrecipient invoices
- Perform site visits as necessary to review fiscal
and program-matic records and/or observe
programmatic activities of the subrecipient - Ensure that all deliverables (e.g., technical,
equipment, and invention reports) required under
the subaward are being provided before approving
invoice payment
20Monitoring UM subawardsORSP responsibilities
- Inform each subrecipient of the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) title and
number, award name and number, and name of the
federal agency providing funding, if applicable - Advise subrecipients of the requirements imposed
on them by federal laws, regulations, the
provisions of the prime award, or provisions of
UM - Ensure that non-profit subrecipients expending
500,000 or more in federal awards during the
subrecipients fiscal year have met the audit
requirements of OMB Circular A-133 - and
21Monitoring UM subawardsMore ORSP
responsibilities
- Issue a management decision (when subrecipients
have A-133 audit findings) within six months
after receipt of the subrecipients audit report
and ensure that the subrecipient takes
appropriate and timely corrective action - Consider whether subrecipient audits necessitate
adjustment of UMs own records - Require each subrecipient to permit UM and
auditors to have access to the records and
financial statements as necessary for audit
purpose - and
22Monitoring UM subawardsMore ORSP
responsibilities
- Review and approve subrecipient invoices and
forward them to the investigator for final review
and approval - Perform desk audits and/or site visits as
necessary for review of subrecipient financial
records - Obtain a Small Business Subcontracting Plan from
the subrecipient if a subaward is on a federal
contract incorporating the Small Business
Subcontracting Plan requirement, the amount of
the award is 500,000 AND the subrecipient is
not a small business
23Changes to existing subawards
- A formal amendment or modification should be
issued to make one or more of the following
changes to an existing UM subaward - Change in period of performance
- Significant change to the budget
- Change in scope of work
- Change of key personnel
- Acquisition of equipment not in the budget
- Issuance of a lower-tier subaward
24Initiating a change to an existing subaward
- To initiate a change to an existing UM subaward,
the investigator should - Obtain prior approval of the sponsor, if required
(concurrence of the technical manager, then
approval of the grant/contract manager) - Forward the following to the ORSP
- Request to Issue Subcontract or Subcontract
Modification Under an Externally Funded Program
form - Description of the change
- Approved budget (if changing funding)
- Documentation of sponsor approval (if prior
approval required)
25Closing subawards
- Subawards must be closed by UM before the prime
award close date (ORSP recommends 30 days before) - Subawards typically have closeout requirements
similar to those of the prime award - The investigator is responsible for insuring that
the subrecipient has submitted all required
closeout reports and a FINAL invoice to UM
26Regrants
27Regrants
- On occasion, a sponsored program will require
contracting with a UM faculty member who has been
selected to perform a portion of the statement of
work, but who was not included in the approved
budget as program personnel. Funds for the
faculty members effort are provided in the form
of a regrant.
28Regrants
- In order to initiate the process of transferring
funds for the faculty members use, a Request to
Issue Regrant form, along with a Transmittal
Sheet, statement of work and budget, should be
submitted to the ORSP. - Work performed under a regrant is subject to the
same terms and conditions as the original award.
29Reporting
30Reporting Technical
- Investigator is responsible for preparation and
submission to sponsor - Frequency and format specified in award terms and
conditions - Timely submission is important
- Failure to submit in a timely manner could
jeopardize future funding from the sponsor - Sponsor uses technical report to monitor and
evaluate project performance
31Reporting Financial
- Accounting Department is responsible for
preparation and submission to sponsor BUT
investigator is responsible for submitting to
Accounting the following information to be used
in financial reports - Effort reporting and certification (see Module 6
for more information) - Cost sharing documentation (see Module 5 for
more information) - Frequency and format specified in award terms and
conditions
32Reporting Patent/invention
- Investigator is responsible for preparation and
submission - Frequency and format specified in award terms and
conditions - Work with ORSP Division of Technology Management
if patents are involved
33Reporting Other
- Investigator is responsible for preparing and
submitting - Frequency and format specified in award terms and
conditions - Investigator is responsible for preparing and
forwarding to ORSP if institutional signature is
required
34Closeout
35Closeout
- What is closeout?
- Where can closeout instructions be found?
- What reports are typically included in closeout
and who is responsible for submitting them?
36What is closeout?
- Closeout is the process that must be followed
when a sponsored project ends to ensure that
sponsor reporting requirements have been met
37Where can closeout instructions be found?
- OMB Circular A-110, Subpart D establishes general
procedures for closeout of federal grants and
cooperative agreements - Agency-specific closeout instructions can be
found in the award terms and conditions
38The closeout process
- Approximately 60 days before project end date,
ORSP sends an email reminder to investigator - The investigator should
- Ensure that all project costs have been
appropriately charged - Ensure that cost sharing is on track
- Review personnel on sponsored project and decide
whether to transfer to another project or
terminate - Remind subrecipients of required reports, if
applicable
39What reports are typically included in closeout?
- Federal grants and cooperative agreements
- Final technical report
- Final financial report
- Final patent report
- Due within 90 days from project end date
40What reports are typically included in closeout?
- Federal contracts
- Final technical report
- Final financial report
- Final patent report
- Final property report
- Contractors release form
- Generally due within 30-90 days from project end
date
41Final technical report
- Sponsor requirements are usually defined in the
award terms and conditions - If an authorizing official signature is required,
investigator should forward report to ORSP for
VC/ORSP signature - Investigator is responsible for submitting report
to agency and sending a disk copy (CD) to ORSP
along with documentation of date report was
submitted to agency
42Final technical reportContent
- The investigator should follow agency
instructions regarding the content and format of
the final technical report. When required, the
final technical report should generally contain
brief information on each of the following - A comparison of actual accomplishments with the
goals and objectives established for the period,
the findings of the investigator, or both.
Whenever appropriate and the output of programs
or projects can be readily quantified, such
quantitative data should be related to cost data
for computation of unit costs. - Reasons why established goals were not met, if
appropriate. - Other pertinent information including, when
appropriate, analysis and explanation of cost
overruns or high unit costs.
43Final financial report
- Accounting prepares with assistance from the
investigator - Accounting usually submits to sponsor, but may
work with investigator to submit if investigator
signature is required and/or if financial report
is to be submitted with technical report
44Final patent/invention report
- Investigator is responsible for preparing report
and submitting to sponsor (with assistance from
ORSP, if needed and/or from ORSP Division of
Technology Management , if patents/inventions are
involved) - If an institutional signature is required,
investigator should forward report to ORSP - Please note that patents should be discussed
with staff in the ORSP Division of Technology
Management as early as possible, even at the
proposal stage. Technology Management staff are
available to assist faculty and other personnel
in identifying proposed project activities that
may potentially result in patentable inventions.
This ensures that faculty are informed at the
outset concerning what to do to protect the
inventions that may arise from the sponsored
project, and also ensures that appropriate
language is included in the sponsored research
agreement establishing the relationship between
the university and the sponsor should an
invention arise from the sponsored project.
45Other final reports
- Investigator is responsible for submission to
sponsor and for sending a copy to ORSP - If an institutional signature is required,
investigator should forward report to ORSP
46Beyond closeout
47Beyond closeout
- Over/under-spent funds
- Project records
48Beyond closeoutOver/under-spent funds
- If a project has significant over-spending or
under-spending, it reflects negatively on the
university - Remember, the budget is the financial expression
of the project
49Beyond closeoutOver-spent funds
- Over-spent funds indicate
- Inadequate planning
- Inadequate financial management
- And the investigator/department pays
50Beyond closeoutOver-spent funds
- Costs charged to sponsored projects that cannot
be collected from the sponsorfor reasons such as
unallowability, unallocability, dispute with or
bankruptcyby the sponsor, or other reasons, must
be paid for with principal investigatoror
departmental funds. - UM Policy ADM.AC.100.900
- (Transfer of a deficit balance to another grant
account is generally unallowable.)
51Beyond closeoutUnder-spent funds
- Under-spent funds indicate
- Inadequate planning
- Inadequate financial management
- Goals of the project not being met
52Beyond closeoutUnder-spent funds
- For cost-reimbursement awards, funds remaining at
the end of the project must be returned to the
sponsor - For fixed price awards, funds remaining at the
end of the project remain available to the
investigator - Remember, the budget is the financial expression
of the project under-spent funds are an
indication of inadequate planning and inadequate
financial management
53Beyond closeoutProject records
- Records retention requirements
- Exceptions to records retention requirements
- Other requirements
- Who is responsible for retaining what?
54Beyond closeoutRecords retention
requirements-federal
- Financial records, supporting documents,
statistical records, and all other records
pertinent to an award shall be retained for a
period of three years from the date of submission
of the final expenditure report or, for awards
that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the
date of submission of the quarterly or annual
financial report. - OMB Circular A-110, Subpart C Post-Award
Requirements
55Beyond closeoutExceptions to records retention
requirements
- If any litigation, claim, or audit is started
before the expiration of the three-year period,
the records shall be retained until all
litigation, claims, or audit findings involving
the records have been resolved and final action
taken - Records for real property and equipment acquired
with federal funds shall be retained for three
years after final disposition - When records are transferred to or maintained by
the federal awarding agency, the three-year
retention period is not applicable to the
recipient
56Beyond closeoutOther requirements
- Health Insurance Portability and Accounta-bility
(HIPAA) documentation should be retained for six
years from the date of its creation or the date
when it was last in effect, whichever is later - Select agent regulations require the retention of
administrative as well as scientific data for
three years - and
57Beyond closeoutMore requirements
- Export control regulations require that all
records required to be kept by the EAR must be
retained for five years from the latest of the
following - The export from the U.S. of the item involved in
the transaction, or - Any known re-export, transshipment, or diversion
of such item - and
58Beyond closeoutMore requirements
- For projects involving patent applications, lab
notebooks and supporting information related to
the patent should be retained for the life of the
patent (20 years) - Misconduct records should be retained for seven
years
59Who is responsible for retaining what records?
- The Investigator is responsible for retaining and
disposing of all project data and materials as
specified in the applicable regulations - Accounting is responsible for retaining and
disposing of all project financial records as
specified in the applicable regulations - The ORSP is responsible for retaining and
disposing of all award records as specified in
the applicable regulations
60Resources
- Post-Award Resource Guide for Principal
Investigators - http//www.olemiss.edu/depts/research/toolbox/inde
x.html - ORSP Subaward Policies and Procedures
- http//www.olemiss.edu/depts/research/office/polic
ies/index.html - Subaward Checklist Primary and Supporting Roles
- http//www.olemiss.edu/depts/research/forms/index.
html - Request to Issue Subcontract or Subcontract
Modification under an Externally Funded Program
form - http//www.olemiss.edu/depts/research/forms/index.
html - Office of Research and Sponsored Programs x7482