From PHARE to ATC

1
From PHARE to ATC

• A. Vink
• Domain Leader ATC, EUROCONTROL

2
Picking up the results of PHARE in EUROCONTROL

• The PHARE programme has researched and
  demonstrated the operational and technical
  feasibility of using ATC Data Processing tools
• The EATCHIP III programme has developed common
  European requirements and generic specifications
  for ATC Data Processing tools
• Convergence of programmes is apparent
• inside EUROCONTROL PHARE and EATCHIP III
• with other programmes EU-CINCAT and FAA-FFP1

3
R D convergence
PHARE tools
EATCHIP III (EATMP)tools
EU CINCAT tools
FAA FFP1 tools

• trajectory predictor
• conflict probe
• flight path monitor
• co-operative tool
• problem solver
• arrival manager
• departure manager
• tact.load smoother
• negotiation manag.

• trajectory predicto
• MTCD
• MONA
• HMI devices
• CORA
• AMAN
• DMAN
• Multi Sector Plan.
• CPDLC

• trajectory predictor
• conflict probe
• flight path monitor
• co-operative tools
• filtering device
• activity predictor
• extrapolation tool
• surveillance aid

• flight profile
• URET
• in URET
• DSR
• CTAS/TMA pFAST
• SMA
• CDM
• CPDLC Builds

feasibility demonstrated

• agreed ORD/specs

similar tools
convergence
4
R D ? Implementation

• The ATC/DP domains have a stake in applied ATC
  research
• The ATC/DP domains raison dêtre is
  implementation
• Implementation responsibility with ATC Service
  Providers
• The road between research and operations is long
  and the gaps are wide
• RD must choose between ownership and
  implementation, it rarely goes together
• Tools similar to PHARE have been implemented
• Use windows of opportunity for implementations

5
R D ? Operations
EATCHIP III (EATMP)tools
Implementation examples (Europe)
PHARE tools

• trajectory predicto
• MTCD
• MONA
• HMI devices
• CORA
• AMAN
• DMAN
• Multi Sector Plan.
• CPDLC

• various local FDPS
• ACOD (Amsterdam), ERATO plans (F)
• Amsterdam, Brussels, SACTA (Esp), ERATO
• ERATO plans in France, ODID based implem.
• HIPS Oceanic, VERA Maastricht UAC
• Amsterdam, Paris, Frankfurt, Copenhagen
• Amsterdam, LATCC, Brussels CANAC
• PETAL trials at Maastricht UAC

• trajectory predictor
• conflict probe
• flight path monitor
• co-operative tool
• problem solver
• arrival manager
• departure manager
• tact.load smoother
• negotiation manag.

6
ATC/DP Domains strategy

• The ATC tool development work is continued in the
  EATMP programmes assigned to the ATC / Data
  Processing Domains
• Automated Support to ATC programme
• Air/Ground Co-operative ATS programme
• The ATM 2000 strategy is driving the EATMP
  ATC/Data Processing domains
• The ATC/DP domains have defined Concept
  Elements, to build ATM 2000

7
Performance driven ATC/DP development

• ATC/DP domains keyword performance driven
• Safety, Capacity, Cost and Environment objectives
  of ATC/DP Concept Elements must be quantified
• if you havent measured, you cant change
• PHARE has proven operational and technical
  feasibility, but quantification is to be
  completed
• The ATC domain has launched a new collaborative R
  D project (INTEGRA), to achieve
• measurement techniques
• measured results

8
Conclusion
Feasibility

• PHARE has demonstrated operational and technical
  feasibility of ATC tools
• Quantification of benefits required

Development

• EATCHIP III has developed common European
  Requirements and Specifications
• EATMP ATC/DP programmes will continue to develop
  ATM 2000 Concept Elements

O w n e r s h I p
Implementation

• Performance driven approach
• Commitment through Convergence and
  Implementation Plan
• Strategy Work Plan Budget

9
From PHARE to ATC

• A. Vink
• Domain Leader ATC, EUROCONTROL
• next